-3(y-5)+6y-2 simplify using distributive property and then combine like terms ANOTHER ONE PLEASE

Answer:

11.422

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]78.2 - 66.778 \\ = 11.422[/tex]

Answer:

A. 70.69 is the correct answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Two lines:

[tex]3x - 4y + 5 = 0 \\2x + 3y -1 = 0[/tex]

To find:

Angle between the two lines = ?

Solution:

Acute Angle between two lines can be found by using the below formula:

[tex]tan \theta = |\dfrac{(m_1 - m_2)}{ (1 + m_1m_2)}|[/tex]

Where [tex]\theta[/tex] is the acute angle between two lines.

[tex]m_1, m_2[/tex] are the slopes of two lines.

Slope of a line represented by [tex]ax+by+c=0[/tex] is given as:

[tex]m = -\dfrac{a}{b }[/tex]

So,

[tex]m_1 = -\dfrac{3}{- 4} = \dfrac{3}{4}[/tex]

[tex]m_2 = -\dfrac{2}{ 3}[/tex]

Putting the values in the formula:

[tex]tan \theta = |\dfrac{(\dfrac{3}{4}- (-\dfrac{2}{3}))}{ (1 + \dfrac{3}{4}\times (-\dfrac{2}{3 }))}|\\\Rightarrow tan \theta = |\dfrac{\dfrac{3}{4}+\dfrac{2}{3}}{ (1 -\dfrac{1}{2})}|\\\Rightarrow tan \theta = |\dfrac{\dfrac{17}{12}}{ \dfrac{1}{2}}|\\\Rightarrow tan \theta = \dfrac{17}{6}\\\Rightarrow \theta = tan^{-1}(\frac{17}{6})\\\Rightarrow \theta = \bold{70.69^\circ}[/tex]

So, correct answer is A. 70.69

What's the question? I can try and help..

Answer:

It has been proved that T is compact

Step-by-step explanation:

To prove this using the definition of compactness, let's assume that T is

not compact. Now, if that be the case, an open cover of T will exist. Let's call this open cover "A". Now, this open cover will have no finite subcover.

Now, from the question, since T is closed, it’s complement R\T will be open.

Therefore, if we add the set R\T to the collection of sets A, then we'll have an open cover of R and also of S.

Due to the fact that S is compact, this

cover will have a finite sub - cover which we will call B.

Finally, either B itself or B\{R\T} would be a finite sub - cover of A. This is a contradiction.

Thus, it proves that T has to be compact if S is to be a compact subset of R and T is to be a closed subset of S.

Answer:

$546

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Amount, P = $650

Rate, R = 12%

Period, T = 7 months

Required

Determine the amount paid.

We'll solve this using simple interest formula, as thus

[tex]I = \frac{PRT}{100}[/tex]

Substitute values for T, R and P

[tex]I = \frac{\$650 * 12 * 7}{100}[/tex]

[tex]I = \frac{\$54600}{100}[/tex]

[tex]I = \$546[/tex]

Hence, Henry's withdrawal is $546

y=mx+b is the general formula of linear equation

y=-2x+5+3x+2

y=1x+7

m=1

b=7

Linear equation given in the question is,

2 + 3x + 5 - 2x = y

To simplify this equation further,

        (2 + 5) + (3x - 2x) = y

         7 + x = y

Now compare this linear equation with the slope-intercept form of the linear equation,

y = mx + b

Here, m = slope of the line'

b = y-intercept

By comparing the equations,

m = 1

b = 7

Learn more,

https://brainly.com/question/15253236

Answer:

[tex]\boxed {\boxed { \sf 12 \ inches}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a triangle can be calculated using the following formula.

[tex]a=\frac{1}{2} bh[/tex]

The area of the triangle is 24 square inches and the base is 4 inches long.

Substitute the values into the formula.

[tex]24 \ in^2 = \frac {1}{2} * 4 \ in * h[/tex]

Multiply on the right side of the equation.

[tex]24 \ in ^2 = ( \frac{1}{2} * 4 \ in ) * h[/tex]

[tex]24 \ in ^2 =2 \ in *h[/tex]

We are solving for the height of the triangle, so we must isolate the variable h. It is being multiplied by 2 inches. The inverse of multiplication is division, so we divide both sides by 2 inches.

[tex]\frac { 24 \ in ^2 }{2 \ in }= \frac{ 2 \ in *h}{ 2 \ in}[/tex]

[tex]\frac { 24 \ in ^2 }{2 \ in }= h[/tex]

[tex]12 \ in = h[/tex]

The height of the triangle is 12 inches.

Answer:

Probability of an event = Number of outcomes favourable to that event/ Number of all possible outcomes.

The set of all possible outcomes is called the sample space and is denoted by S.

Any 3 fruits out of 11 in the box can be randomly selected in 11C3= (11x10 x 9)/(1 x 2x3) = 165 ways. Hence n(S) = 165.

We want the desired event E that the 1 fruit of each type is chosen. Now 1 apple out of 5 can be chosen in 5C1 = 5 ways, 1 out of 4 oranges in 4C1 = 4 and 1 banana out of 2 in 2C1 = 2 ways. Therefore, by fundamental counting principle, one of each type of fruit can be chosen in 5x4x2 = 40 ways So n(E) = 40.

Hence the probability of getting three fruits one of each type is = n(E)/ n(S) = 40/165 = 8/33.

The probability that all four children receive the same fruit is 2/33.

Probability refers to potential. A random event's occurrence is the subject of this area of mathematics.

The range of the value is 0 to 1. Mathematics has incorporated probability to forecast the likelihood of various events.

The degree to which something is likely to happen is basically what probability means.

Given:

We have 5 apples and 6 oranges.

So, if we choose 4 apples then the probability can be

= 5 /11 x 4/10 x 3/9 x 2/8

= 120/ 7920

and, if we choose 4 oranges then the probability can be

= 6/11 x 5/10 x 4/9 x 3/8

= 360/ 7920

Thus, the combined probability

= 120/7920 + 360/7920

= 480/ 7920

= 2/33

Learn more about Probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ6

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

This is a complete question

Trials in an experiment with a polygraph include 97 results that include 23 cases of wrong results and 74 cases of correct results. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that such polygraph results are correct less than 80​% of the time. Identify the null​hypothesis, alternative​ hypothesis, test​ statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null​ hypothesis, and final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the​ P-value method. Use the normal distribution as an approximation of the binomial distribution.

The computation is shown below:

The null and alternative hypothesis is

[tex]H_0 : p = 0.80[/tex]

[tex]Ha : p < 0.80[/tex]

[tex]\hat p = \frac{x}{ n} \\\\= \frac{74}{97}[/tex]

= 0.7629

Now Test statistic = z

[tex]= \hat p - P0 / [\sqrtP0 \times (1 - P0 ) / n][/tex]

[tex]= 0.7629 - 0.80 / [\sqrt(0.80 \times 0.20) / 97][/tex]

= -0.91

Now

P-value = 0.1804

[tex]\alpha = 0.01[/tex]

[tex]P-value > \alpha[/tex]

So, it is Fail to reject the null hypothesis.

There is ample evidence to demonstrate that less than 80 percent of the time reports that these polygraph findings are accurate.

Step-by-step explanation:

csc θ sin θ

(1 / sin θ) sin θ

1

The simplified value of the given expression comes to be 1.

The given expression is:

[tex]cosec\theta.sin\theta[/tex]

The trigonometric ratio [tex]cosec\theta[/tex] is the ratio of the hypotenuse to the opposite side. It is the inverse of [tex]sin\theta[/tex].

[tex]cosec\theta=\frac{1}{sin\theta}[/tex]

We know that [tex]cosec\theta=\frac{1}{sin\theta}[/tex]

So [tex]cosec\theta.sin\theta[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{sin\theta} .sin\theta[/tex]

=1

So, the simplified value is 1.

Hence, the simplified value of the given expression comes to be 1.

To get more about trigonometric ratios visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24349828

Answer: b) Surveys

When a person does not have enough time he must should take the faster and effective route in this case carlos does not have time for individual interviews or phone calls. Focus group is not used to get feedback it is to discuss about data before a item is launched. Therefore it should be survey because it is used to collect feedback from large amount of people.

Must click thanks and mark brainliest

Answer:

$540.98

Step-by-step explanation:

future value= $ 50,000

number of deposits (n)= 8*12 = 96

rate (r) = 4% per month

= 4÷12 per annum

= 0.33% p.a

i = 0.33÷100

= 0.0033

We know,

Future value of annuity = P÷i [ (1 + i)^n - 1 ]

$50,000 = P÷ 0.0033 [ ( 1+0.0033)^96 - 1]

$50,000 * 0.0033=P [ (1.0033)^96 - 1 ]

$165 = P*0.305

P = $165÷0.305

P = $ 540.98

Rough::

let x= 1.0033)^96

log x = 96 * log (1.0033)

log x = 0.1156

x = Antilog (0.1156)

= 1.305

1.305 - 1 = 0.305

Based on the fact that you asked this three times and got the same answer three times, I suspect the interpretation made by the users that posted those answers was incorrect, and that you meant to ask about dividing in base 2.

We have

111001₂ = 1×2⁵ + 1×2⁴ + 1×2³ + 1×2⁰ = 57

1101₂ = 1×2³ + 1×2² + 1×2⁰ = 13

and 57/13 = (4×13 + 5)/13 = 4 + 5/13.

4 = 2² is already a power of 2, so we have

111001₂/1101₂ = 1×2² + 5/13

we just need to convert 5/13. To do this, we look for consecutive negative powers of 2 that 5/13 falls between, then expand 5/13 as the sum of the smaller power of 2 and some remainder term. For instance,

• 1/4 < 5/13 < 1/2, and

5/13 - 1/4 = (20 - 13)/52= 7/52

so that

5/13 = 1/4 + 7/52

or

5/13 = 1×2 ⁻² + 7/52

Then a partial conversion into base 2 gives us

111001₂/1101₂ = 1×2² + 1×2 ⁻² + 7/52

111001₂/1101₂ = 100.01₂ + 7/52

Continuing in this fashion, we find

• 1/8 < 7/52 < 1/4, and

7/52 = 1/8 + 1/104

==>   111001₂/1101₂ = 100.011₂ + 1/104

• 1/128 < 1/104 < 1/64, and

1/104 = 1/128 + 3/1664

==>   111001₂/1101₂ = 100.0110001₂ + 3/1664

• 1/1024 < 3/1664 < 1/512, and

3/1664 = 1/1024 + 11/13312

==>   111001₂/1101₂ = 100.0110001001₂ + 11/13312

• 1/2048 < 11/13312 < 1/1024, and

11/13312 = 1/2048 + 9/26624

==>   111001₂/1101₂ = 100.01100010011₂ + 9/26624

• 1/4096 < 9/26624 < 1/2048, and

9/26624 = 1/4096 + 5/53248

==>   111001₂/1101₂ = 100.011000100111₂ + 5/53248

and so on.

It turns out that this pattern repeats, so that

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{111001_2}{1101_2} = 100.\overline{011000100111}_2[/tex]

Answer:

7/8

Step-by-step explanation:

7/8 = 0.875

5/8 = 0.625

7/13 = 0.538

11/19 = 0.579

So 7/8 is the largest

Answer:

➕

Step-by-step explanation:

i know the answer ok it is easy

Answer:

The  95% confidence interval is  [tex]98.27 < \mu < 102.53[/tex]

This interval means that there 95% confidence that the true mean is within this interval  

Yes i would agree with my friend because the lower and the upper limit 95% confidence interval for mean points scored at home is greater than 98 points

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  sample size is  n =  20

   The  sample mean is  [tex]\mu = 100.4[/tex]

     The standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma = 4.86[/tex]

Given that the confidence level is  95% then the level of significance is mathematically evaluated as

                [tex]\alpha = 100 - 95[/tex]

               [tex]\alpha = 5\%[/tex]

                [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex]

Next we obtain the critical value of [tex]\frac{ \alpha }{2}[/tex] from the normal distribution table, the value is  

           [tex]Z_{\frac{ \alpha }{2} } = 1.96[/tex]

Generally the margin of error is mathematically represented as

           [tex]E = Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } * \frac{\sigma}{ \sqrt{n} }[/tex]

substituting values

            [tex]E = 1.96 * \frac{ 4.86 }{ \sqrt{20 } }[/tex]

           [tex]E = 2.13[/tex]

The  95% confidence interval is  mathematically represented as

          [tex]\= x - E < \mu < \= x + E[/tex]

substituting values

         [tex]100.4 - 2.13 < \mu < 100.4 + 2.13[/tex]

          [tex]98.27 < \mu < 102.53[/tex]

Answer:

40 $

Step-by-step explanation:

He first deposited 60 quarters=15$, 53 dimes=5.3$, 44 nickels=2.2$, and 50 pennies=0.5$ Total 23$

23$+17$=2*(total deposit)

so total deposit = 20

"If Ahmad received 2 twenty-dollar bills in cash" - does not mean that he deposited those 40$

so total deposit = 20$

Step-by-step explanation:

sorry but u should provide with a diagram for better understanding of ur question

Answer:

{-3, 1, 5, 6}

Step-by-step explanation:

The domain of a relation is the x-values represented in that function. In a coordinate pair, the x-value comes first, so all of the first numbers in each of the pairs are part of the domain. When writing domain, it should always be in the least to greatest order. Therefore, the domain is {-3, 1, 5, 6}. Since this relation is a function, none of the x-values will repeat.

Step-by-step explanation:

Three-halves = 4 = 6

HOPE SO IT HELP'S YOU

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean squared error (MSE)of a set of observations can be calculated using the formula :

(1/n)Σ(Actual values - predicted values)^2

Where n = number of observations

Steps :

Error values of each observation (difference between actual and predicted values) is squared.

Step 2:

The squared values are summed

Step 3:

The summation is the divided by the number of observations

The difference between the actual and predicted values is known as the ERROR.

(1/n)Σ(ERROR)^2

n = 3

Error = +3, +3, - 3

MSE = (1/3)Σ[(3)^2 + (3)^2 + (-3)^2]

MSE = (1/3) × [9 + 9 + 9]

MSE = (1/3) × 27

MSE = 9

Answer:

5*sqrt3

Step-by-step explanation:

The vector AB= (0-(-1), 4-2,6-3) AB= (1,2,3)

The modul of AB is sqrt(1^2+2^2+3^2)= sqrt14

The vector AC is (1-(-1), 1-2, 2-3)= (2,-1,-1)

The modul of B is sqrt (2^2+(-1)^2+(-1)^2)= sqrt6

AB*AC= modul AB*modul AC*cosA

cosA=( 1*2+2*(-1)+3*(-1))/ sqrt14*sqrt6= -3/sqrt84=

sinB= sqrt (1- (-3/sqrt84)^2)= sqrt75/84= sqrt 25/28= 5/sqrt28

s= modul AB*modul AC*sinA= sqrt14*sqrt6* 5/ sqrt28= 5*sqrt3

Answer:

37

Step-by-step explanation:

Tan(B) = 6/8

B= arctan(3/4)=37

Answer:

A. 6²¹

Step-by-step explanation:

When you have a number raised to the power in that form, you have to multiply the powers:

(6⁷)³

7×3 = 21

(6⁷)³ = 6²¹

Answer:

A. 6 raise to 21

Step-by-step explanation:

its a formula if:

a raise to m whole raise to n = a raise to m×n

so here

          6 raise to 7 × 3

         that is 6 to the power of 21

Answer:

Option C

Step-by-step explanation:

f(1) = -8

f(2) = -5/2×-8 = -20

f(3) = -5/2×-20 = -125

.

.

.

So option C is the answer

Answer:

C.  a1 = -8

an = an-1 * 5/2  for n >1

Step-by-step explanation:

-8, -20, -50, –125, 625,...

We need to find the common ratio

Take the second  term and divide by the first term

-20/-8 = 5/2

Take the third term and divide by the second term

-50/-20 = 5/2

The common ratio is 5/2

A geometric sequence is

an = a1 * r^(n-1)

an = -8 *(5/2)^(n-1)

We can also write a recursive formula

a1 = -8

an = an-1 * 5/2  for n >1

Answer:

$18.37

Step-by-step explanation:

$16.70 × 1.10 = $18.37

or

$16.70 × 0.10 = $1.67

$16.70 + 1.67 = $18.37

Answer:

Total expected amount = $0.04375

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to calculate probability of getting heads on every combination of coin tosses

HHH = 1/8 = 3 heads

HHT = 1/8 = 2 heads

HTH = 1/8 = 2 heads

HTT = 1/8 = 1 head

THH = 1/8 = 2 heads

THT = 1/8 = 1 head

TTH = 1/8 = 1 head

TTT = 1/8 = 0 head

So the probability of 3 heads is 1/8 and the amount is (1/8)* 0.14 = $0.0175

Probability of 2 heads is 3/8 and the amount is (3/8) * 0.06 = $0.0225

Probability of 1 head is 3/8 and amount is (3/8) * 0.01 = $0.00375

Total expected amount = 0.00375 + 0.0225 + 0.0175

Total expected amount = $0.04375

Answer: 72

Step-by-step explanation:

no. of family pizzas-  2

cost of one family pizza - 24 each

total cost for family pizza -48

one family pizza's cost equals to 3 small pizzas

which is cost of 3 small pizzas = 24

therefore, total cost= 24+48

=72

Answer:

-1 8/9

Step-by-step explanation:

w + ( - x)

w = -5/9

z = 4/3

Input:

-5/9 + ( -4/3)

-5/9 - 4/3

-4/3 * 3/3 = -12/9

-5/9 - 12/9 = -17/9 = -1 8/9

If my answer is incorrect, pls correct me!

If you like my answer and explanation, mark me as brainliest!

-Chetan K