Answer: B. Corporations
Explanation:
why isn't full employment the same as zero unemployment
Answer:There are different types of unemployment, and some are unavoidable or even necessary for a functioning labor market.
Explanation:At any given time, jobs are being created and destroyed as industries evolve, and the transition from old jobs to new is not seamless.
Examine the following situations decide whether the search violates the fourth amendment.explain your decisions.
d.Pam is seen shoplifting in a store.police chase Pam into her apartment building and arrest her outside the closed door of her apartment.A search of her apartment reveals a large quantity of stolen goods.
e. Sandi is suspected of receiving stolen goods. The police go to her house and ask Claire,her roommate,if they can search the house.Claire gives them permission,and they find stolen in Sandis dresser
Pam is seen shoplifting in a store and Sandi is suspected of receiving stolen goods this suggests that there is a violation in the fourth amendment with respect to the case of Sandi.
What is the fourth amendment?The Bill of Rights is comprised of the Fourth Amendment to the U.s. Constitutional. It outlaws arbitrary warrantless searches.
In this situation where families have been seen shifting or is being seen to be taking the goods from a store. This music that she is a criminal police had the right to search her apartment but if a person is suspected without having any kind of proof which is the case of Sandi and still her house is being investigated without her permission then it is a violation of the 4th amendment right.
Learn more about fourth amendment, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8244125
#SPJ1
What is democracy promotion
Answer:
ExplDemocracy promotion, which can also be referred to as democracy assistance, democracy support, or democracy building, is a strand of foreign policy adopted by governments and international organizations that seek to support the spread of democracy as a political regime around the world.
a court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except a) the written agreement does not contain the whole agreement. e) the missing term is a condition precedent to the written agreement. c) the missing term is part of a subsequent oral agreement. d) the missing term is part of a collateral agreement. b) the written agreement is unambiguous.
A court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except the written agreement is unambiguous.
Hence , option B is correct
What do you mean by parol?
Parol can be defined as a release of a prisoner on some conditions who has served part of a sentence as well as is under legal custody. It is generally given because of good behaviour. It helps them in reintegrating into society and humanising their life. It is the provisional or temporary release of a prisoner who has to agree to certain Norms like deposit , security before release. The parole rules as described in the Prisons Act, 2000 which are part of both legal and prisons law.
Hence, A court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except the written agreement is unambiguous.
Hence , option B is correct
To know about Parol from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/3520914
#SPJ4
errigal just graduated from college. the cost of moving personal belongings to a first job site qualifies for the moving expense deduction.
Answer:meofrrje
Explanation:
ni pa i43r3t53
the common law system is built on precedent. what does this mean? choices the decisions made by previous congresses influence current legislation. codes that were written for specific issues are reevaluated over time. previous administrative decisions are treated as law. previous court decisions are applied to current and future cases.
The case that caused widespread use of Bertillonage to end was:
a. Will West case
b. Brandon Mayfield case
c. William A. Hamm case
d. Francis Galton case
We can actually see here that the case that caused the widespread use of Bertillonage to come to an end was: A. Will West case.
What is the Will West case?The Will West case is actually known to be the case that transpired in the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth. Will West was known to be an African American whose record matched to the record of William West, who had a previous conviction for murder. This took place after Will West was subjected to the standard admission procedure. Yet his records matched that of William West.
When William West was summoned, the clerks discovered that William West was actually different from Will West. They had carried out measurements using three systems of personal identification - photographs, Bertillon measurement and names but these systems failed.
This then led to the use of fingerprints and completely ended the widespread use of the Bertillonage system.
Learn more about Bertillonage on https://brainly.com/question/12871099
#SPJ1
How does the U.S. government influence the market economy?
It tells companies how much to charge for all goods.
It provides public goods and services.
It prevents states from collecting taxes.
It buys companies in foreign markets.
69 points man
for the memes
Answer:
It provides public goods and supplies
Explanation:
Governments can create subsidies, taxing the public and giving the money to an industry, or tariffs, adding taxes to foreign products to lift prices and make domestic products more appealing. Higher taxes, fees, and greater regulations can stymie businesses or entire industries.
In what situations would a court be likely to award a quasi-contract?.
There are two situations at which a court likely to award a quasi contract .
When the unjust enrichment is a relatively insignificant amount of moneyIf the defendant was unjustly enriched and played a part in deceiving the plaintiffA quasi-contract is a retroactive agreement between two parties without any prior obligation to each other. It is created by judges to fix situations where one party gets something at the expense of the other party.
The purpose of a quasi-contract is to achieve a fair result in situations where one party has an advantage over the other. The defendant, the party that acquired the property, must pay the plaintiff, the damaged party, a refund to cover the value of the goods.
A quasi-contract is also called an implied
contract.
Considering the example above, the person who ordered and paid for the pizza has every right to claim payment from the person who actually received the pizza. The former is the plaintiff and the latter is the defendant.
Under the jurisdiction of common law, quasi-contracts arose in the Middle Ages under the form of an act known in Latin as indebitatus assumpsit.
This rule of law was the court's way of making one party pay the other as if a contract agreement already existed between the parties. To learn more about qucsi contract, refer :
https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
I just entered my card information on your site but I am getting continuous pop ups etc asking for more payment.
The pop-up advertisements that claim you've won are frequently only a cover for viruses and con artists.
What are advertisements?Advertising sometimes referred to as an advert or ad, is typically seen as a form of public discourse that supports a good, service, organization, or event. Some others consider the concept to be far broader than that, including any sort of sponsored advertisement intended to inform or influence
On occasion, pop-up advertisements congratulating you on winning a reward may have interrupted your smartphone browsing on other websites. Navigate to Settings while in Safe mode, then swipe to and tap Apps. From here, you can uninstall the most recent app(s) that have been installed or updated and may be the source of the pop-up ads.
Therefore, advertisements that claim you've won are frequently
Learn more about advertisements here:
https://brainly.com/question/3163475
#SPJ1
To what extent do you think the criminal justice system response to the pandemic has had an impact on the provision of public safety? Here you must look at the crime rates during the pandemic and measures introduced during the pandemic such as curfews and the ban of alcohol.
Globally speaking, COVID-19 has significantly changed criminal justice systems. It has affected crime trends, the ability of the police to catch specific crimes like child abuse, and how the justice system handles the pandemic's effects.
Major policy and practise changes have been started at an unprecedented rate by some leaders in the justice system. Technologies have been used to enable remote working, new working practises have been implemented, and protocols have been modified to give high risk offences priority.
Leaders are optimistic about the advantages of the changes, but there are some worries as well. As an illustration, there is a delay in some areas, such as the courts and probation services, and it is still unclear how COVID-19 will affect the justice system in the long run.
To know more about COVID-19:
brainly.com/question/28908700
#SPJ1
you should never make a u-turn near the top of a hill where you cannot see or be seen from both directions for ___ feet.
You must never perform a u-turn at the top of a mountain if you can't see or be seen for 500 feet in both directions.
A mountain is an elevation section of the Earth's crust with steep sides and exposed bedrock. Although definitions fluctuate, a mountain differs from a plateau in that it has a smaller summit area and is generally higher than a hill, rising at least 300 meters above the surrounding plain. A few mountains have isolated summits, but the vast majority are part of mountain ranges. Mountains are produced by tectonic processes, erosion, or volcanism, which operate on temporal frames of up to hundreds of millions of years. After mountain development stops, mountains are gradually flattened through weathering, slumping, and other forms of mass wastage, as well as erosion by river and glaciers.
Learn more about perform here
https://brainly.com/question/13175022
#SPJ4
Discuss the following question (300 word minimum)...
This Ted Talk was given 4 years ago. We are currently seeing the issues that can arise from countries threatening nuclear war (Russia's invasion of Ukraine). Don't forget, Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, and Ukraine became the world's third largest possessor of nuclear weapons from the fall of the Soviet Union. As a result, Ukraine agreed to become a Non Nuclear Weapon State giving up all of their 1,900+ nuclear weapons.
Why is important for the U.S. to monitor WMDs throughout the world? The U.S. has WMDs; so, should we have the authority to tell other countries that they can't have them? Do you think Russia would have invaded Ukraine if they had not agreed to give up their nuclear arsenal almost 28 years ago?
In the past, countries that have various proliferation capabilities have done so primarily to stave off challenges to regional security and secondarily to discourage American engagement.
A nation's decision to develop WMD is exclusively dependent on the threat that other nations pose to that nation. No other nation may meddle in it. However, the creation of WMD is resisted in order to preserve international harmony and prevent further conflicts.
What are WMDs?A chemical, radiological, biological, nuclear, or other weapon that have the potential to kill many people, seriously injure them or significantly disrupt both man-made and natural structures, as well as the biosphere, is considered a weapon of mass destruction.
China, France, India, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States are the eight countries.
Most are in Russia's arsenal, followed by those of the United States.
Learn more about WMDs, from:
brainly.com/question/14586437
#SPJ1
in a two (2) paragraphs write what you understand about the the territorial power and how can it help to impose security in a establishment.
Based on socio-political and security concepts, territorial power can help to impose security in an establishment by assisting the establishment to function and move legitimate goods in relative freedom within the country and across its borders.
What is Territorial Power?Territorial Power is a term that is used to describe the power which a government or establishment has over a particular area. This power helps the establishment govern and protect the place against internal and external influence.
Territorial power can help impose security in an establishment because they will be able to exercise the power to station security personnel and defend against any form of invasion or robbery.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the use of territorial power is essential for establishments to provide adequate security for themselves.
Learn more about Territorial power here: https://brainly.com/question/13664169
#SPJ1
as long as the child is in a safety seat, it doesn't matter if they are strapped into a front passenger seat or a back passenger seat.
the burden of proof that a liquidated damages provision was unreasonable at the time of contracting rests on the party trying to:
The burden of proof that a liquidated damages provision was unreasonable at the time of contraction rests on the party trying to: "Avoid Payment."
What is Burden of Proof?
The duty to produce evidence relevant to the lawsuit or criminal accusation is known as the burden of proof.
The burden of proof in a civil action brought by one person against another belongs to that person. Each of the two parties involved would be asked to recount their own side of the story once the case received an official response and the trial process got underway. The plaintiff, the party who filed the lawsuit with the court, is responsible for proving that the allegations made in the lawsuit are true and that the other defendant is to blame for the harm or damages at issue.
To know more about Burden of Proof, click on the link given below:
https://brainly.com/question/22982480
#SPJ4
a law office interviews paralegals for 10 openings. there are 15 paralegals with two years of experience and 24 paralegals with one year of experience. how many combinations of six paralegals with two years of experience and four paralegals with one year of experience are possible?
The paralegals possible for this would be 19,399,380
First we find how many combinations of 6 out of 15 and 4 out of 19 we can make.
15C6 = 5005
19C4 = 3876.
Using the counting principle.
5005 x 3876 = 19,399,380
What do you mean by paralegal?
They are usually appointed by law officers in order to assist them and perform several tasks.
Paralegal duties revolve around legal documents, research, interviewing clients and witnesses and visiting courts.
Hence, The paralegals possible for this would be 19,399,380
To know more about Paralegal from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/25507890
#SPJ4
How can we use stasis theory on Depp V Heard trial. What are ways this issue has been framed?
Answer:
Explanation:
To help you develop a plan for an argument, using stasis theory can help in your invention stage.In a discussion of a problem or issue, stasis theory asks you and your fellow debater to come to an agreement on an issue. For example, people have various opinions about sexism and racism. Let's take sexism, for example. Some people do not feel that sexism exists while others are adamant that it does. To come to an agreement, you could apply stasis theory by first asking if it really exists or happens (fact). Next, you and your friend would need to define and discuss what acts make up or constitute sexism (definition). Then, you have to look at the character or nature of the act. Is the issue hurtful or not (quality: right or wrong)? Finally, is there something that should be done about this concern (policy: plan of action)? These questions help develop the issue at hand. Background:Stasis theory was developed by an ancient rhetorician named Hermagoras, an ancient Greek in the 3rd century BC. He proposed four questions to help analyze or study a problem or issue, and those questions can be used as an invention help. Aristotle, another ancient Greek and philosopher and rhetorician from the 4th century, is often associated with the idea of stasis theory, and he used it primarily in the invention stage. The theory was later refined by Cicero, and orator, and other others.
7. Economists may disagree because they have
different
pre
TEMPER
a. hunches about the validity of alternative
theories.
Prestan
Milita
Quick Qu
b. judgments about the size of key parameters.
c. political philosophies about the goals of public
policy.
d. All of the above.
Economists may disagree because they have different all of the above. The correct option is D.
What do economists disagree about?There is widespread disagreement among economists about the appropriate size of government, the power of trade unions, the negative effects of unemployment and inflation, equitable income distribution, and whether or not a tax-cut policy is desirable. On these issues, economists are divided.
Economists may reach different scientific conclusions. To put it another way, economists may disagree on the validity of option positive theories about how the world really works.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about economists here:
https://brainly.com/question/14299791
#SPJ1
Quebec has held two referendums – public votes – on the question of some form of sovereignty or political separation from Canada, the first in 1980 and the 2nd was in 1995. Discuss the differences between the two referendums.
Quebec has held two referendums – public votes – on the question of some form of sovereignty or political separation from Canada
The failure of the Meech Lake Accord and the Charlottetown Accord left big uncertainty approximately the constitutional future of Canada.
The primary signal was a dramatic exchange within the political landscape of the residence of Commons following the 1993 election. The innovative Conservative birthday party, related to former top Minister Brian Mulroney and the failed accords, changed into clearly wiped out.
Even as the federalist Liberals below Jean Chrétien received a majority, the competition was fractured along regional lines, between the western-based Reform birthday celebration of Canada and the avowedly separatist Bloc Québécois, which shaped the legitimate competition.
Learn more about sovereignty https://brainly.com/question/7793449
#SPJ1
what similarities and differences do you find among grotius, wilson, and posner? which argument do you find most compelling and why? what are the strengths and weaknesses of international law and organizations? are they effective at promoting peace and cooperation?
Hugo grotius : Known as the father of international law. He developed the rules governing the conduct of war
Posner : According to Posner, states will not reliably comply with customary international law.
Wilson : He sought to take international law out of the hands of states and give it to the true sovereign.
Strengths of international law are
They promote unity and strength.Settle various disputesDiscuss important world ordersMaintain a global system including trade, commerce and governance.Weakness of international law are
Lacks effective law machinery
The International Court of Justice has no authority.Weak sanction and efficiency.They help in promoting peace and stability but due to certain issues it gets into backend. With proper control it can definitely be improved.
To know more about International law from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/1449228
#SPJ4
the defendant, an avid fan of his hometown football team, shot at the leg of a star player for a rival team, intending to injure the player's leg enough to hospitalize him for a few weeks, but not to kill him. the player died of loss of blood. what is the most serious offense of which the defendant could be properly convicted?
The defendant could be properly convicted of Murder or to be specific Involuntary manslaughter
What do you mean by murder?
It can be defined as the crime of intentionally killing a person.In cases like these, the court either punishes the killer with either the death penalty or life imprisonment. The case of death of a star player was ultimately linked to blood loss caused by a bullet shot.
Therefore manslaughter which can be further defined as the killing of a person without malice aforethought but with either the intention to commit an unlawful act that leads to an unintended death has committed by the defendant which led to charges of murder.
Hence, The defendant could be properly convicted of Murder or to be specific Involuntary manslaughter
To learn more about Murder from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/28478113
#SPJ4
Alexander hamilton said that the power of the supreme court rested on the power of ______.
Answer:
Judgement is the answer.
How would America be different if the Ludlow Amendment was passed?
Answer:
This proposed amendment to the Constitution would have required that any presidential candidate receive support from two-thirds of the states in order to be elected. This would have had a profound impact on American politics and would likely have led to a more decentralized and federalized country.
Studies have found that gang member drug selling increases after leaving the gang.
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
because the gang still are going to need to get money
in this and the next four problems, assume the litigation occurs in federal district court. ann, a citizen of illinois, sues barbara, also a citizen of illinois, alleging that barbara violated federal civil rights statutes in firing her. ann seeks to add a state law claim alleging that her firing also violated a state wrongful discharge law. is there supplemental jurisdiction?
Yes, it is the supplemental jurisdiction, also known as pendent jurisdiction, one of the authorities of the United States federal court.
The ability of United States federal courts to hear additional claims that are substantially related to the original claim even though the court lacks the subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the additional claims independently is known as supplemental jurisdiction, also referred to as ancillary jurisdiction or pendent jurisdiction. Pendent jurisdiction, as defined by the Supreme Court as "jurisdiction over non federal claims between parties litigating other matters lawfully before the court," is the right of a United States federal court to hear a closely connected state law claim against a party currently facing a federal claim.
For similar questions visit here :
https://brainly.com/question/14368682
#SPJ4
Do you think the Pennsylvania system of prisons was too cruel or harsh or could modern prisons benefit from revisiting this early system? Explain your answer.
Answer:I do think the Pennsylvania system was too harsh. They was criticized for being too costly because they wanted to focus on solitary confinement. They was also criticized for the inmates physical and mental health because of solitary confinement as well. It seem as if they was going off a method of being a workshop. The system was even impractical. I don’t think modern prisons would be able to benefit off this system. While it’s true that prisons are making money off the amount of inmates, mental help should be offered as well. Physical help should be offered too. I’ve seen plenty of stories where inmates would die from their injuries in prison and no physical help is given such as fighting or even a female inmate giving birth.
Explanation:
_____ refers to the number of clients for whom a probation officer is responsible at any one time.
Caseload refers to the number of clients for whom a probation officer is responsible at any one time.
Why is managing the caseload crucial?It is primarily a tool for the client's immediate benefit as well as for professional development and supervision.
Note that the supervisee's type and amount of work is outlined by caseload management.
Therefore, based on the above, the term Caseload is one that is seen as the quantity of families or children assigned to a specific worker in a particular amount of time.
Learn more about Case from
https://brainly.com/question/1046966
#SPJ1
The Directorate of Intelligence is
O is an intelligence division of the FBI
O is an agency in the Department of Homeland Security
O in charge of administering the Patriot Act
is the head of the FBI
The Directorate of Intelligence (DI) of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is in charge of analyzing the information gathered by CIA special agents.
What is the directorate of operations' purpose?The collection of human intelligence, also known as HUMINT, is the responsibility of the Directorate of Operations. They carry out covert action as directed by the president when it is required and in unique circumstances.
Who makes up the community of intelligence?The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), and the intelligence components of the five DoD services are the nine elements of the Department of Defense. the Air Force, Space Force, Army, Navy, and Marine Corps.
Learn more about CIA here:
https://brainly.com/question/9227515
#SPJ1
HELP i think its B.
The U.S. Constitution makes it clear that laws must never be challenged.
A - True
B - False
Answer:
B-Fales
Explanation:
An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose.
Parliament alone is given the power to make changes to this framework under Article 368 [16]. Unlike ordinary laws, amendments to constitutional provisions require a special majority vote in Parliament.
Basically, it is harder to make changes in the law, but does not mention that laws must never be challenged.