Answer:
Over 50%
Explanation:
Over 50% of these accidents are caused by alcohol impaired drivers. Over 50% of all fatal highway crashes involving two or more cars are alcohol related. Over 65% of all fatal single car crashes are alcohol related. Over 36% percent of all adult pedestrian accidents are alcohol related.
Quick! You’re looking for a part-time job, you walk into a local business, and they’ve got a big “HELP WANTED” sign. The manager greets you and asks, “Interested in work?” What do you say to convince her to hire you, right there on the spot?
Answer:
You will say yes and tell her how interested you are in the job and tell her how you can be a part of the productivity of the business....Everybody wants their business to be successful so if you can tell the person how you can improve the productivity of the business and how yiu are capable for the job then the person will hire you right away.
How did the Enlightenment idea of natural rights affect the United States? The US must limit its power in order to keep strong relationships with allies. It helped promote the idea of a powerful leader, similar to a monarchy. The US adopted those ideals as an argument to become independent. It ensured that the government would meet the obligations of its citizens.
Answer:
The US adopted those ideals as an argument to become independent.
Explanation:
just took the test
Answer:
c. The US adopted those ideals as an argument to become independent.
Explanation:
Its one edge :)
16. Jim is a patrol officer who finds a large amount of marijuana.
What type of math will he use to determine the exact punishment
of the suspect who possessed this marijuana?
a) Accident Investigation
b) Doppler Effect
c) Breathalyzer
d) Measurements or Conversions
Answer:
D
Explanation:
because he has to measure the amount of it
What is patriotism? Give an example.
Answer:
patriotism means love for motherland or devotion to one's country.An example of patriotism is waving the flag proudly on your home or soldiers fighting for their country.
Explanation:
hope it will help ^_^
Which is a difference between a constitutional government and a government without a constitution
How is a constitutional government different than a country without a constitution? it is limited government. First, no written constitution can possibly spell out all the laws, customs, and ideas that grow up around the document. Governments that give people economic, social, and political freedoms are democratic.
A sample of air occupies 10 L at 127 degrees Celsius and 1 atm pressure. What volume will the air occupy when it’s cooled to -23 degrees Celsius at the same pressure
Answer:
The volume that the air occupies is 15,996 L
Explanation:
The combined gas law is used.
(P1 * V1) / T1 = (P2 * V2) / T2
Having the data of:
P1 = 1 atm
V1 = 10L
T1 = 127 degreees celsius = 400.15 K
P2 = 1 atm
T2 = -23 degrees celsius = 250.15
(P1 * V1) / T1 = (P2 * V2) / T2
(P1 * V1 * T2) / (T1 * P2) = V2
V2 = (1 atm * 10L * 400.15 K) / (1 atm * 250.15 K)
V2 = 15.996 L
Civil Disobedience is defined as open, peaceful violation of a law to protest its alleged injustice.
True
False
Answer:
This is true
Is the Law Fair to All?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
But if we violate them it can lead to the consequences
4. When someone is hurt in an altercation and one party sues the other for repayment of their
medical bills, they would be suing for
A) Punitive Damages
B) Medical Reimbursements
C) Damages
D) Victimization Payments
the longer your travel distance, the more likely you are to encounter
Answer:
Hazards
Explanation:
Just took the test!!
Answer:unexpected hazards
Explanation:driving longer and in places your not familiar with your more likely to come upon unexpected hazards. :)
During the 2011 Arab Spring movement, the country of Bahrain stifled the voices of its protesters – restricting where they could gather together and what they could say. Based on this information, which human rights did its government limit? Select all that apply.
What year was the Federal Bureau of Prisons created?
O 1930
O 1915
O 1960
O 1820
During the 2011 Arab Spring movement, the country of Bahrain stifled the voices of its protesters – restricting where they could gather together and what they could say. Based on this information, which human rights did its government limit? Select all that apply. Heres the choices to the question: the right to drive automobiles the right to free speech the right to gather peacefully the right to travel to the United States the right to own property
Answer:
the right to own property
Which natural rights did Rousseau believe human beings are born with? life, liberty, and happiness life, liberty, and property liberty, social justice, and education liberty, social justice, and property
Answer:
life liberty and property
Explanation:
Answer:
It’s B
Explanation:
1–4. Spotlight on AOL—Common Law. AOL, LLC, mistakenly made public the personal information of 650,000 of its members. The members filed a suit, alleging violations of California law. AOL asked the court to dismiss the suit on the basis of a "forum-selection clause" in its member agreement that designates Virginia courts as the place where member disputes will be tried. Under a decision of the United States Supreme Court, a forum-selection clause is unenforceable "if enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought." California courts have declared in other cases that the AOL clause contravenes a strong public policy. If the court applies the doctrine of stare decisis, will it dismiss the suit?
Answer:
If the court applies the Stare decisis doctrine, the case will not be dismissed.
Explanation:
The stare decisis doctrine will provide the necessary legal bases for the case to proceed within California. This will happen because there is a legal decision applied throughout the national territory that states that this type of clause, which presents a selection forum, is inexorable. This happens because the AOL clause violated, in fact, a very strong public policy, so the judges are obliged to continue with the case, within the state where the public policy was violated.
what can declare laws unconstitutional
Answer:
I think its the supreme court
Explain the democratic principles that are exemplified in the Declaration of Independence
Answer:
The Declaration of Independence was mainly prepared by Thomas Jefferson, it was and is a document that has had great significance for other countries 'and peoples' struggle for self-determination. The ideas behind the document are, among other things, strongly inspired by the British philosopher John Locke. The Declaration is based on natural law, and a general principle of equality for all human beings. In the first part there are some references to Enlightenment and natural law principles, including the reference to "natural and divine law" and to the principle of equality: "All men are created equal", and immediately after the reference to "inalienable rights". Reference is also made to the right of the people to rebel against established authority theorized by Locke: "it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it".
List 10 of your daily activities (for example, waking up, eating, and going to school). Next to
each item, list any laws that affect that activity.
Answer:
Every single activity of our lives are governed by a set of laws, often called rules and regulations.Explanation:
Every single activity of our lives are governed by a set of laws, often called rules and regulations. It binds us to act and perform our activities in the most appropriate and safe manner.
Going to the park - Public Decency Law.Driving - Traffic Law.Going for shopping - Civil Law.Reaching school on time - School norms and regulations.Working in a job - Labor laws.Taking public transportation - Civil Law.Parking the car - Traffic Law.Doing homework and school assignments - School norms and regulations.Throwing garbage and wastes - Municipal and community law.Using internet and social media - Cyber Law.The 10 of my daily activities include simple activities like waking up and going to do my job while driving my car and usage of computer systems and internet in the office.
The laws that affect the daily activities done by me are as mentioned below. It is to be noted that certain laws may be repeated due to the nature of such activity.
Activity #1- Using apartments elevators- Housing society laws.Activity #2- Driving the car to reach office- Traffic rule and regulations.Activity #3- Parking the car in Proper parking zone- Traffic rules.Activity #4- Listening to licensed music albums- Intellectual properties Act.Activity #5- Surfing the internet - Cyber securities law.Activity #6- Walking on road- Constitution Act (Freedom of movement)Activity #7- Doing Banking transactions- Banking Regulation Act.Activity #8- Living with my Hindu wife- Hindu Succession Act.Activity #9- Making business deals for my partnership firm- LLP Act.Activity #10- Trading in share and securities- Securities and Exchange regulations.
Hence, the correct set of rules and regulations that are followed by me on a regular basis are as the ones aforementioned.
To know more about rules and laws, click the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/3980297
Ques-5 satyagarhis
wins battle through
non violence explain with examples
طلسمشفع ععصيام
طو
Answer:
Ghandi
Explanation:
Ghandi fought peacefully but stood up for what he believed in.
Aside from a target, who else can be impacted by online cruelty? Who else could be involved, implicitly or explicitly?
Answer:
Online Cruelty takes places when a person uses digital tools such as mobile phones and internet to harass or upset someone, often repeatedly.
Such people behave thoughtlessly and cruelly.
It harms a person's mental well being and health.
It can encourage other people to carry out physical attack as cruelty threatens a persons physical integrity.
The family members and friends of the target are likely to be affected by the behavioral changes in the target.
Arnold is a bank employee. He has told his colleague Adolf about his intention of embezzling some funds from the bank. Instead of advising Arnold against committing such a crime, Adolf has been encouraging his friend to go ahead with the embezzlement. Which type of incomplete crime is Adolf committing in this scenario?
Answer: I feel as if that would be treated as a Solicitation
Explanation: solicitation can mean “explicit offering of money to a person“ which can be turned around and used for crime.
why do people get epilepsy and how can it be treated
Answer:
Anyone can develop epilepsy. Epilepsy affects both males and females of all races, ethnic backgrounds and ages. Brain conditions such as brain tumors can cause it. Strokes are also the leading cause of epilepsy. Infectious diseases like meningitis can also cause epilepsy.
Explanation:
Treatment usually involves anti epileptic medications or sometimes surgery can control seizures for the majority of people with epilepsy. Other treatments like devices and changes in diet are used. Some people require lifelong treatment to control seizures, but for others, the seizures eventually go away. Some children with epilepsy may outgrow the condition with age. As of now there is no cure for epilepsy.
Adding which of the following would help strengthen the article’s focus on the impact of speedy trials on migrants? (A) detailed description of the situation in Central America (B) opinion of migrant kids on the creation of “rocket dockets” (C) more information on the mindset of judges hearing speedy trials (D) more emphasis on the lack of legal representation for defendants
Answer:
(D) more emphasis on the lack of legal representation for defendants
Explanation:
There are several laws made for migrants but the speed of the trials is slow and takes long time get any result.
To improve the speed of the trial on migrants will improve when government will focus on emphasising on the lack of legal representation for defendants as defendants play very important role in legislation and can present such argument that can focus on the speedy trials on migrants.
Hence, the correct answer is "(D) more emphasis on the lack of legal representation for defendants".
Read the descriptions of each action. Based on your understanding of what constitutes a crime, establish whether each action has both actus reus and mens rea and qualifies as a crime. Explain your answer in a few sentences. Joseph, a vegan, went to a restaurant for dinner. He lost his temper when the server accidentally brought him a meat dish. He slammed his hand hard on the table. The impact caused a glass to fly off the table and strike a woman at the next table, causing a laceration.
Answer:
The act of inflciting bodily harm to the woman is a crime under "actus reus".
But there is no intentional crime committed under "mens rea".
So, the act doesn't qualify as a crime.
Explanation:
In criminal law, "actus reus" is when a person physically harms another person along with "mens rea" which is the mental intention of doing the crime and planning it. That means that an act can be considered a crime only when the actus reus and mens rea are hand-in-hand.
In the given scenario, Joseph's act of slamming his hand on the table is the result of his anger on being served a non-vegetarian dish even though he is a vegan. And this resulted in the bodily harm of the woman nearby. And this act of inflicting bodily harm to another person is not an intentional act, for Joseph did not pre-plan it. So, we can safely say that the action does not constitute a criminal act.
Answer:
Actus reus is the action involved in a criminal act, and it is a crucial element of a crime. In this case, Joseph’s voluntary actions injured the woman, and authorities can establish actus reus. However, authorities cannot establish mens rea, which refers to the intent or the purpose of the criminal act, because Joseph did not intend to injure the woman. Because there is no concurrence of actus reus and mens rea in this case, we cannot classify Joseph’s action as a crime.
Explanation:
Plato
Why did it take so long to develop a police force in England? In the United States?
Why people should not be fined according to their income?
Answer:
be “expected” to pay more. A person works really hard to get “wealthy”. They work hard so that life becomes easier on the long run that includes being able to afford stuff more easily. If the start paying for everything based on how much they earn there is no point in them working so hard. The biggest incentive of working hard is lost then. And productive of people come down when there is no incentive.
I understand your question was specific to fines but then later someone will say the wealthy should pay more for limited goods cause it's fairer that way, someone else will say the same about real estate and so on. So saying yes to fines based on income starts an endless chain which finally will bring down productive of the society on a whole
If you refuse to take the tests required by Florida's Implied Consent Law, your license will be suspended for at least:
Answer:at least 1 year
Explanation:
Answer:
at least for a whole year
Explanation:
What would happen if the democrats won?
Answer:
If democrats win
leader is chosen by people people can remove the leader if they are not satisfied with himElection held after a given period of timeElection held in free and fair mannerAlso there is multiparty system present in democracyHope it helps
In Abel v. Baker, a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a contract for the sale of a car. Now a trial court in the same state is deciding Charles v. Delta, a case with similar facts. Under the doctrine of stare decisis, the trial court is likely to
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
The definition of stare decisis is “the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent.”
If the case is in the same state as the appellate court then the trial court will have to follow the precedent set by said appellate court. Most likely the case will be dismissed
what is the holding of case
Answer:
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Holding: This is a statement of law that is the court's answer to the issue. ... Reasoning: This is the court's analysis of the issues and the heart of the case brief. Reasoning is the way in which the court applied the rules/ legal principles to the particular facts in the case to reach its decision.
Explanation: