Below iS Spanish painter Juan Gris's 1921 work, Guitar and Bottle. How does
this artwork reflect the post-World War I era in which it was created?
Juan Gris is one of the most famous Cubist artists and his work is one of the most characteristic movements. His paintings are as important as those of Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque who influenced him.
This painting reflects the influence of industry and modernism in art, giving way to the more expressive and provocative works of the period. At the time, Cubism was a revolutionary movement that bridged the gap between the visual arts, which were considered the only true arts.
Created like a collage using identifiable objects such as glasses and bottles. guitar, newspaper. fruit bowl. As society was still in transition to new art forms, the work reflected what Bridges of Experiment lacked in Modernism more than in Surrealism, Pop Art, and other contemporary art movements.
Learn more about Juan Gris at
https://brainly.com/question/17613220
#SPJ1
Read the excerpt from The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone.
Young had learned to read before he was two, and by the age of twenty had mastered a dozen foreign languages including Arabic, Persian, and Turkish. An inheritance from an uncle left him free to pursue his scientific interests. At various times, Young studied the habits of spiders, the surface features of the moon, and diseases of the chest. Then, intrigued by the challenge of the Rosetta Stone, he put aside his other studies and concentrated on attempting to decipher the writing on it. Young had read of de Sacy’s and Akerblad’s work in Paris, and was determined to succeed where they had failed.
Based on the details in the excerpt, James Cross Giblin’s attitude toward Thomas Young is
positive because Young shows the skills and determination to figure out the inscriptions.
positive because Young is wealthy and has plenty of free time to pursue anything that interests him.
negative because Young lacks the experience needed to read foreign languages.
negative because Young is overconfident in his ability to succeed where others have failed.
Based on the details, Giblin’s attitude toward Thomas Young is positive because Young shows the skills and determination to figure out the inscriptions.
What is attitude?We can define attitude as the way an author feels about something or someone as he writes about them. Here, we must read the excerpt by Giblin to determine his attitude about Thomas Young.
Let's list what Giblins says about Young in the excerpt:
Young was clearly smart, since he learned to read before the age of two.He was skilled when it came to languages, as he was proficient in several of them by the age of twenty.Young had a curious mind, for he studied all kinds of interesting subjects.Young was determined to succeed at translating the inscriptions in the stone.With the information above in mind, we can conclude that Giblin's attitude toward Young is positive. He lists the skills Young has and mentions his determination to handle the inscriptions. Option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about attitude here:
https://brainly.com/question/10231627
#SPJ1
Which of the following accurately describes a major difference between the western Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire?
A: The Byzantine government clearly placed the emperor as the highest religious authority, while the Roman government kept political and religious authority more separate.
B: By the fourth century, the western Roman Empire was much wealthier than the Byzantine Empire.
C: The western Roman Empire saw much civil unrest over the issue of Christian icons, while it was uncontroversial in the Byzantine Empire.
D: The Byzantine church in the East claimed authority for all Christians while the church in the West organized the church in a more federal form.
One major difference was A: The Byzantine government clearly placed the emperor as the highest religious authority, while the Roman government kept political and religious authority more separate.
How did the Byzantines differ from the western Romans?The Western Romans had the Pope as the head of the church and the emperor as the head of the empire thereby keeping both offices separate.
The Byzantines on the other hand, had their emperor as both the head of the empire, and the head of the church.
Find out more on the Byzantine empire at https://brainly.com/question/1446842
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
If a plaintiff receives an unfavorable ruling on a case involving patent law, they would appeal to which federal court of appeals?
Thirteenth
First
Ninth
None. Patent law cases are ineligible for appeal.
What do you think? Use information from the lesson and the maps to explain your opinion on whether or not the US should have gone to war with Mexico to expand its borders in the 1800’s. Give at least two reasons for your point of view and answer in complete sentences. I think the US should/should not have …. Why? First, I believe that …. Second, I hold the view that ….
I think the US shouldn't have gone to war with Mexico in 1800. First, I believe that an independent country shouldn't have its lands conquered by other countries.
Secondly, I consider that although civilizations have historically been marked by wars, these are never favorable and generate violence and the deaths of innocent people.
What was the American-Mexican War?It was a series of conflicts that took place between the United States and Mexico in the period from 1846 to 1848. It began with the American ideals of territorial expansion in lands belonging to Mexico.
The conflict ended with the defeat of Mexican troops by the Americans, leading to the conquest of Texas, which after a period of independence, became part of the American domain.
Therefore, wars and conflicts between countries due to territorial expansion can lead to negative consequences for the lives of civilians, in addition to weakening economic relations between the countries involved.
Find out more about American-Mexican war here:
https://brainly.com/question/12609518
#SPJ1
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!
The rise of the guilds would be most directly connected to what medieval process in Western Europe?
O Feudalism
O Manorialism
O Scholasticism
O Specialization
Scholasticism is the medieval process in Western Europe, as the rise of the guilds would be most directly connected Hence,
What is Scholasticism?It frequently drew on writings from antiquity and placed equal emphasis on rational argumentation and Christian theology. Scholasticism was a rational and acceptable method of learning, but it was also dogmatic and strictly adhered to one set of rules. Greek skholastikos, which meaning "a scholar," is where the word "scholasticism" originates.
Scholasticism refers to the philosophical frameworks and speculative tendencies of different medieval Christian scholars who strove to reconsider general philosophical concerns despite working in opposition to unchangeable religious dogma.
Scholastic philosophy dominated institutions between 1100 and 1500. The Scholastics valued empiricism and believed that rationality, logic, and academic inquiry could buttress Roman Catholic beliefs.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more information about Scholasticism, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11009328
#SPJ2
What geographic obstacles has China had to overcome?
Dry deserts and high mountains are the main geographical obstacles for china.
Dry deserts to the north and west, the Pacific Ocean to the east, and insurmountable mountains to the south separated the vast territory from the rest of the globe. This allowed the Chinese to evolve independently of the rest of the world's civilizations.
The Himalaya Mountains are located to the south and southeast of China. These are the world's tallest mountains. They formed an almost impenetrable boundary for Ancient China, isolating the region from many other civilizations. They were very significant in Chinese religion and were revered.
The Gobi Desert and the Taklamakan Desert were two of the world's biggest deserts to the north and west of Ancient China. These deserts also served as barriers between China and the rest of the globe. The Mongols, on the other hand, dwelt in the Gobi Desert and were continually attacking northern Chinese towns. This is why the Chinese erected the Great Wall of China to defend them against northern invaders.
Therefore, the answer is dry deserts and high mountains.
To know more about china click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11915231
#SPJ1
How would Federalists most likely respond to this?
They would agree but doubt the Constitution could make that happen.
They would doubt that any central government could meet these goals.
They would argue that the government does not need to control itself.
They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals
For the Federalists, their most likely response is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Who were the Federalists?The Federalists were American Founding Fathers who wanted a strong government and strong executive branch.
The Federalists were opposed by the anti-Federalists who wanted a weaker central government.
The Federalists did not vote for a bill of rights because they regarded the constitution as sufficient, unlike the anti-Federalists who demanded a bill of rights to be part of the Constitution.
Thus, for the Federalists, their most likely response is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists at https://brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ1
Option D. The way that the federalists would respond to this would be They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Who were the federalists?This was the name that was used to refer to the people that were in support of the United States having a central government.
They wanted a federal government that would be in the helm of affairs of the states and all of the citizens.
complete questionRead the excerpt from the Publius.
In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.
—Publius
How would Federalists most likely respond to this?
They would agree but doubt the Constitution could make that happen.
They would doubt that any central government could meet these goals.
They would argue that the government does not need to control itself.
They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.
Read more on the federalists here: https://brainly.com/question/412270
#SPJ1
Why was Imperialism a cause of World War I?
Nations competed for more land, colonies and raw materials. Great Britain and Germany competed industrially, which led to these nations needing more raw materials. Also, Austria-Hungary controlling the Slavic land of Bosnia, which Serbia believed belonged to them.
What is the primary target of communist theory?
All class divisions
National borders
Wealth
Factories
The idea behind the communist theory is that all persons born are not born to a particular social class, hence, option A is the correct answer.
What is the communist theory?communism is a political practice is in which the ownership of properties by an individual is to be replaced by communal ownership, in this sense, all properties especially the ones that are most valuable and businesses that are lucrative belong to the community.
In conclusion, communism is a classless social system with one form of public ownership of the means of production.
Learn more about communism here:
https://brainly.com/question/891214
#SPJ1
Answer:
All class divisions
Explanation:
Other person is correct
According to the lesson, President Truman was responsible for which of the following?
Desegregation of Public Education
Black Voting Rights Act
Equal Opportunity in Secondary Education
Desegregation of the Armed Forces
According to the lesson, President Truman was responsible for the desegregation of the Armed Forces.
What are Truman's contributions to desegregation?The president was responsible for signing the prohibition of racial segregation in the armed forces, in 1948, instituting the possibility for blacks to be included in the country's armed forces.
Therefore, President Truman focused on the civil rights inclusion of African Americans who suffered from strong racial segregation and violence even with some constitutional rights already guaranteed.
Find out more about Truman here:
https://brainly.com/question/14920954
#SPJ1
Under the Constitution, political rights protect the freedoms of
citizens accused of a crime.
elected representatives.
every American citizen.
state and national officials.
Under the Constitution of the United States of America, political rights protect the freedoms of: C. every American citizen.
What is a Constitution?A Constitution is a set of formally written laws and principles which typically determines the power and authority of a democratic government or parliamentary government, as well as guarantee the fundamental rights and freedom of her citizens.
In this context, we can infer and logically deduce that political rights protect the freedoms of every American citizen under the Constitution of the United States of America.
Read more on Constitution here: brainly.com/question/19129329
#SPJ1
20. why did navies create democracies
Well, democracy is a Greek-born concept.
So, When and why did democracy happen in ancient Greece?
To Give vs To Receive
There are several variations of democracy as it is used in various nations today. Democracy now has as many influences as there are varieties of bananas available on the market thanks to historical events and thinkers. But whenever academics discuss the beginnings of democracy, they always go back to the same location. They reflect on this amazing civilization known as Ancient Greece.
If you imagine democracy to be a legacy of one great philosopher among ancient Greeks, you are dead wrong. In fact famous philosophers like Aristotle and Plato had many objections to democratic governments. For Aristotle, ordinary people such as carpenters, soldiers, farmers, had too many things to do in a day, they cannot be expected to cultivate "virtues". Virtue, in the eyes of Aristotle, is the domain for the elite class. A sector of society with sufficient wealth and leisure time for whom to devote time and effort to cultivate virtue without material gain comes naturally. For Aristotle, states should be governed by such people. I wouldn't be surprised if the etymology of "Aristocrat" has to do with Aristotle.
Neither did Plato say anything better. In fact, monarchies, dictators, and despots would find in Plato their inspiration. Plato saw a government governed at the top by a philosopher-king to be the best. Just as a healthy and just body is governed by knowledge and reason, a healthy and just society is one governed by a "lover of knowledge", hence the philosopher-king.
Democracy was not an invention of a great mind. It was invented by lesser minds. It was invented by people with a "war-like" character, invented by Greek warriors. People who were bellicose and cocky. A class of people who were eager to win material gain by pillaging other towns. In ancient times, to make war with other states with the aim of material gain was how states pursued economic development. From this breed of people came a battle formation which is admired up to this day: the phalanx.
In a phalanx, the Greeks arrayed themselves in close rectangular formation. Because the terrain of Greece is rugged, one particular size became effective often. It was 20 x 15, twenty men across, 15 men deep. Do the math and you will see 20 x 15 = 300.
Given that an individual warrior had the minimum battle skills, the success of the Phalanx depended on its cohesion. It had to march and maneuver as a group. Its success depended on coordination. Attack as one, retreat as one when needed. It had to stay together no matter what. I hope, my friends, you can imagine how unnerving it might have been for untested warriors to man the front line of a Phalanx. But true to their character, with grit and valor they manned their places in the formation.
My friends, I hope you are still with me on this page because I haven't said yet how the Phalanx gave rise to democracy.
When the Greek warriors, coming from battles, marched back to their states they divided the loot among themselves. If they won against an invading army, each recounted his deeds in the battlefield in front of his comrades in a gathering possibly organized at night, around bonfires. But when it came to issues of state policies, each demanded a voice in government. Because, each contributed to the success of the Phalanx, it was only fitting that the voice of each be heard. The Greeks agreed, and so it was sealed.
"Awuuu, awuuu, awuuuuuu", they said.
Phalanx gave rise to Democracy. It was put together by a class of men who from the standpoint of philosophers were lesser minds. But because ancient Greek warriors gave so much for the Phalanx to succeed, their voices were heard in government. They gave, and a lot they did.
Democracy was born in Athens between 700 BC and 500 BC..
My dear friends, let us look at our democracy now. Today the only righteous mind to keep in modern society, it seems, is the one that listens to the people. To listen to that sector of society we call the masses.
During the infancy of democracy, ancient Greek warriors gave a lot to their city-states which in turn won them a voice in government. But today, moral philosophy compels us to do differently. In modern democracy, moral philosophy compels governments to listen to the voice of the masses. But listen closely and you will hear it distinctly. Give us!
Where as, the ethical system of ancient Greek warriors compelled them to give in order to be heard, the ethical system of modern democracy compels the state to listen to those whose only longing is to receive. To give to the masses whose voice is one. Give us!
economic fist semester guid
The first semester guide on economics gives information about all that will course would be offering from the beginning till the end of the semester
These informations includes:
RegistrationSchedule timing for each classTest scheduleExamination schedule e.t.cWhat is economics?Economics can be defined as a social science which studies wants in relation to scarce means that has alternative uses
So therefore, the first semester guide on economics gives information about all that will course would be offering from the beginning till the end of the semester
Learn more about economics:
https://brainly.com/question/17996535
#SPJ1
The response of the international community to Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990 best illustrates the
a.
lack of cooperation between the major world powers.
b.
global acceptance of imperialism.
c.
effect of oil on world politics.
d.
ineffectiveness of United Nations peacekeeping forces.
Please help I don't know
Answer:
D
Explanation:
A is true, there was a lot of argument within the coalition forces.
B, many countries oppose imperialism
C is true, but it doesn't fit the context, the Kuwait is oil-rich so countries would want to liberate it to retain their oil supply
D, peacekeeping forces were not used in the gulf war.
Which statement BEST describes the United States economic history during the period 1865-1900?
1.The lack of immigration tended to decrease industrial production.
2.A. Industrialization increased at a rapid pace.
3.Farmers imported most of their raw materials.
4.Industrialization increased at a slow rate.
Answer:
2.A.
Explanation:
Industrialization increased at a rapid pace
Which is a characteristic of a federal state?
A.
governmental power is held by a single individual
B.
governmental power belongs to the people
C.
governmental authority resides entirely in the central government
D.
governmental power is shared
The characteristic of a federal state is that governmental power is shared.
What the characteristics of federal states?In a Federal state, the power of government is shared among the tiers of the government which includes state and local government.
The above means that each region would have control and power over to independently regulate themselves.
Learn more about federal states here: https://brainly.com/question/21185733
#SPJ1
why did general macarthur address congress after he was fired?
Answer:
He wanted to thank Americans for treating him as a hero.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!!
Drag the tiles that list events in the LGBTQ movement to arrange them in chronological order. Answer
Correct sequence: Very top- Stonewall Riots,
Phyllis Schlafly uses anti- gay rhetoric in STOP ERA,
Harvey Milk Electrd to San Francisco Board of supervisors,
Save our children overturns gay rights law in Florida,
Briggs initiative defeated
The chronological order of events in the LGBTQ movement is:
Stonewall Riots,Phyllis Schlafly uses anti- gay rhetoric in STOP ERA,Save our children overturns gay rights law in FloridaHarvey Milk elected to San Francisco Board of supervisors,Briggs initiative defeatedWhat were some notable events in LGBTQ history?The Stonewall riots of 1969 showed resistance to police attacks on LGBTQ frequented areas. Phyllis Schlafly's used STOP ERA campagns to come after gay rights in the 1970s.
Harvey Milk was a gay man elected to the San Francesco Board of supervisors in 1977 and in the same year, Save Our Children was able to repeal a gay rights law in Florida.
The Briggs initiative was defeated in 1978 and it would have banned gay people from working in schools owned by the California government.
Find out more on the Harvey Milk at https://brainly.com/question/16966826.
#SPJ1
Answer:
here's a picture
Explanation:
edmentum
How would you compare the early Roman Empire to the empire conquered by Alexander the Great?
Answer:
I would focus on how one of the empires lasted for nearly 2 millennia (if you count Byzantium as Rome), and how the other fell apart very soon after the empire’s namesake “Alexander” perished.
Explanation:
2.04 Give Me Liberty
Step One
.
.
two grievances from
Not able to trade freely
Unfair taxes
Hist
Quartering troops in your home
Not able to vote for government leaders
Standing armies in your neighborhood
Judges abaries and jobs a
of this king
Step Turd: Write a newspaper headline:
Stop The Write your story. You will have at least 2 paragraphs describing an event that has
happened as a result of us having no laws against the grievances above. You will have to
research the grievance to know what it meant back in the day. Then, make it relevant to today. Be
creative! Have fun! Make it realistic!
Example:
Headine Judge for Sole
On May 28, Brad Austin passed by the British standing army at the mall. Not looking
where he s s going, Brad walked into one of the soldiers and knocked him down. The
stunding ormy immediately arrested Brad and took him to jail for assaulting a British
officer Brad tried to explain that it was a mistake. He showed the officer his call log on
The information is to write about the newspaper headline of your choice and this is illustrated below.
How to write the newspaper headline?High taxes on groceries
On February 20th, a young man that was named John Kings was on his way to the grocery. He needed to pick some things on his way before going home.
He picked some gingerbread and went to check out. The gingerbread was $5 but the total price was $8. He was unaware ans had only $5 with him. The unfair taxes are wrong.
Learn more about newspaper headline on:
brainly.com/question/18077891
#SPJ1
were Japanese American minorities treated fairly or unfairly during world war II?
Answer:
NO
Explanation:
36. Intelligence efforts should focus on the group's:
A. Membership.
C. Stated and unstated goals.
B. Resource base.
D. All of the above
Using the terms in the box below, complete the paragraph on the Dawes Act. You may use terms
more than once or not at all.
manifest destiny
Tears
Citizenship
Removal
Indian
Transcontinental
Allotments
Tennessee
Georgia
Savage
Trail
American
When the American colonies were first settled, Native Americans and European colonists found
themselves competing for natural resources, land, and food. In 1833, as the first wave of————————
took over the nation, President Andrew Jackson seized Native American lands in the
states of———————-
and————————
Native Americans were forced to move to the
midwest; their journey would later be known as the——————
of————————.
When these Native Americans were resettled in the Midwest, many tribes were condensed and given
lands within the Native American territory. Instead of giving them an equivalent amount of land, these
tribes saw their land holdings shrink; additionally, many tribes were moved to places that they knew
nothing about and at times, multiple tribal nations would be forced to share land.
After the Civil War, a second wave of manifest destiny swept the nation. As the———————-Railroad was completed, more and more Americans looked to the west for opportunity. The Native
American territory in Oklahoma that was created by the———————— ————————Act of
1833 was now land that was lucrative. It could be used for grazing and other agricultural purposes.
Additionally, it was a commonly held view amongst Americans that tribal lands being held in a
communal manner was too———————or uncivilized.
As such, starting in the late 1870's and early 1880's, American government officials began thinking
about ways to encourage Native Americans to convert from a belief in communal ownership of tribal
land into Americans who believed in capitalism. One way they encouraged this was through creating
a system of————————-,where each family or individual could receive a specific parcel of land.
Additionally, if Native Americans were willing to move out of the tribe and live separately, they would
receive American—————————-Thus, a major cause of the Dawes Act was—————————-The act itself created a system of—————————-this split up the Native territory amongst many different Native American
individuals or families and served the hopeful effect to "westernize" or civilize the Native Americans.
Please help me that’s text please
The Supreme Court serves what important function in the U.S. federal
government?
Answer:
The judicial branch
Explanation:
The judicial branch is a branch of the federal government that makes sure that laws are constitutional.
What were the main two sources of Constantinoples economic well-being?
The two main sources of of Constantinople's economic well-being was largely due to
Trade in agricultural produceReduced taxation in the cityThe Byzantine empire was know to accommodate a lot of trade. Its capital Constantinople was a major trade hub for agricultural produce.
Constantinople was a prime hub in a trading network that at various times extended across nearly all of Eurasia and North Africa.
Another important factor was the taxation system. The country side paid more taxes than the cities, therefore people were forced to move to the city for trade.
What was the Byzantine Empire?The Byzantine Empire, which is also known as the Eastern Roman Empire or Byzantium, was the extension of the Roman Empire in its eastern provinces.
This empire existed during the during Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, when its capital city was Constantinople.
Learn more about the Byzantine Empire at https://brainly.com/question/1446842
#SPJ1
Effect of the war of 1812 on the society. 5-6 sentences
Henry Clay, a negotiator at Ghent and one of the greatest political actors of his age, summed up three points that the United States had gained from the treaty of Ghent.
1-The British reputation had suffered at Ghent, not the Americans
2- By standing up singlehandedly to the mightiest power on Earth, the United States had established its national character
3- In the ordeal of war and peace, the republican government born of the Revolution had met the crucial test
In addition I would add a few other points. The powerful Indian nations of the Southwest and Northwest that had been able to play off off rival Western powers against each other for generations lay defeated. The United States was able to acquire large amounts of territory in the Southwest, which can be seen here. Secondly while the United States filibusters had failed in their attempts to acquire East Florida, they managed to hold onto West Florida. The late war victories ushered in a degree of unprecedented nationalism leading to the drastic expansion of Federal power far exceeding the Federalist era of 1788-1800, many of these programs are difficult to explain absent a new emerging American nationalism, which can be read more in The Awakening of American Nationalism: 1815 - 1828 by George Dangerfield. Some of these new institutions and programs included but are not limited to: The Second Bank of the United States ( similar to the first but on more Republican principles), The drastic expansion of the United States Navy in 1817, the first protective tariff in American history to protect growing American industry, Federal support for the colonization society, the first Federal pension. Others have argued that the war increased the pace of liberalization within the United States and increased the pace of the market revolution (a term no longer in favor) see The Republic Reborn: War and the Making of Liberal America, 1790-1820.
To expand a bit, what was the point of the whole affair? Was it really about impressment of American sailors into the British navy, which is the only reason I remember for the war from high school
In short no it wasn't just about impressment. Until 1811 in fact the main point of contention between the United States and Britain had been over trade issues. A cornerstone of Republican ideology for both Madison and Jefferson was that free ships made free goods, and that the free transfer of goods around the world would serve as a carrier for Republicanism. The ongoing wars in Europe had resulted in both France and Britain imposing sanctions on neutral vessels, the United States was one of the largest merchant states in the western world and the largest neutral carrier and the restrictions fell hard on the Republic. Events like the Chesapeake-leopard affair hardened attitudes in the United States towards Britain.Moreover Britain had grown fearful over the dramatic expansion of the American merchant fleet, and while willing to give concessions to smaller carriers like Sweden, was not willing to do so for the United States. You also had British support for the native peoples in the Northwest. Finally political relations between Republicans and Federalists had grown increasingly hostile, and Britain was viewed as popularly supporting the Federalist minority, see America on the Brink:How the Political Struggle Over the War of 1812 Almost Destroyed the Young Republic for the struggle between Federalists and Republicans that is particularly harsh on the Federalist for Anglo-American relations see Bradford Perkins Prologue to War:Prologue to War: England and the United States, 1805-1812.
Did the US "win" the war? I always had the impression that the British mainly couldn't be bothered to fight much (being busy with the whole Napoleon thing) and the victories the US achieved (USS Constitution, Lake Champlain, New Orleans) were not that strategically significant.
Which of the following movements argues that people sometimes fail because of circumstances that are out of their control?
Socialism
the Social Gospel
Naturalism
Social Darwinism
was U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War was motivated by a desire to promote democracy or by another, larger factor.
The U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War was purely motivated by a desire to prevent the spread of communism and not just to promote democracy.
What was the U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War?The foreign policy of the United States during the Cold War was the protection of its international interests against the Soviet Union's communism.
The United States' foreign policy then focused on:
Communism Atom bombsFree tradeDemocracy.From the above points, we understand that the U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War was not motivated by a desire to promote democracy.
But another factor that motivated the country's foreign policy and international relationships was the containment of the threats posed by communism and socialism from the Soviet Union.
Thus, the U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War was purely motivated by a desire to prevent the spread of communism and not just to promote democracy.
Learn more about the U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War at brainly.com/answer expert verified
#SPJ1
Summarize the Introduction to the Colonization of Time by Giordano Nanni