Additionally, mercantilists thought that a country's economic health could be gauged by how much gold or silver it possessed.
What did mercantilists believe about a country's balance of trade?In order to finance a country's import of products and support its export industry, according to the mercantilist economic theory, which prevailed in Europe from the 16th to the 18th century, a favorable trade balance must be maintained.
Mercantilism is the practice of governments using their economy to bolster state authority at the expense of other countries. The goal of governments was to increase their bullion holdings and ensure that exports exceeded imports (mostly gold and silver).
Why did mercantilists object to people stockpiling gold and silver?Many mercantilists did not submit to the balance of payments. In reality, they were worried about the prospect of keeping their gold and silver. This is thus since many mercantilist philosophers were the most concerned with increasing employment.
Learn more about mercantilists: https://brainly.com/question/14385474
#SPJ1
Additionally, mercantilists believed that the amount of gold or silver a nation had might be used to determine that nation's economic health.
What did mercantilists believe about a country's balance of trade?A nation must keep a positive trade balance in order to finance its import of products and support its export industry, according to the mercantilist economic theory.
Mercantilism is the act of governments using their economies as a tool to expand their power at the expense of other countries. The goal of governments was to increase their gold reserves and make sure that exports exceeded imports (mostly gold and silver).
How come mercantilists were against people hoarding gold and silver?Numerous mercantilists refused to accept the balance of payments. Actually, their main concern was whether they would be able to keep their gold and silver. This is due to the fact that many mercantilist philosophers were most interested in creating more jobs.
Learn more about mercantilists: brainly.com/question/14385474
#SPJ1
What source of law is provided by the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution?
Federalism law is provided by the Tenth Amendment of the constitution. The American version of "federalism," the system by which the legal powers of governance are divided between the federal government based in Washington, D.C.
It is defined by the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which is frequently overlooked.
The relationship between the federal and state governments is defined by the 10th Amendment, which also contributes to this definition. The challenge of balancing state and federal interests as they relate to the federal government's authority to tax, police, and regulate matters like wage and hour laws.
The release of personal information in record keeping systems, and laws pertaining to strip mining has gotten worse as federal activity has increased.
To know more Amendments like this
brainly.com/question/13276862
#SPJ4
information taken directly from an existing classified source
Information taken directly from an existing classified source and stated verbatim in a new or different document is an example of information extraction.
Classified information is often collected by governments for various reasons. It can be used to monitor terrorist activities, develop new weapons, or even spy on foreign governments. It is also important for the government to keep certain information private, such as diplomatic negotiations and trade agreements. In addition, classified information can be used to help inform decision-making and protect citizens from harm.
Businesses also use classified information to protect their interests. Companies use classified information to protect their trade secrets and proprietary technology. This helps them stay ahead of their competitors and maintain a competitive edge. For example, a company may have access to classified information that could allow them to develop a new product before their competitors, giving them a huge advantage in the market.
Learn more about stated verbatim at : https://brainly.com/question/30142714
#SPJ4
Information taken directly from an existing classified source and stated verbatim in a new or different document is an example of ______
what is one reason prosecutors may decide to dismiss cases? group of answer choices reputation of defense attorney unreliable victims application of nolo contendere failure of plea bargain
One reason prosecutors may decide to dismiss a case is the reputation of the defense attorney. If the prosecutor believes that the defense attorney has a reputation for effectively defending their clients or winning cases, they may decide to dismiss the case to avoid the possibility of losing in court.
When a prosecutor decides to dismiss a case, it means that they are choosing not to pursue criminal charges against the defendant. This can happen for a variety of reasons.
One possible reason is the reputation of the defense attorney. If the prosecutor is familiar with the defense attorney and knows that they have a reputation for being skilled and effective at defending their clients, the prosecutor may decide that it's unlikely that they will be able to secure a conviction in court. In such a scenario, the prosecutor may decide to dismiss the case in order to avoid the risk of losing and conserving resources.
It's important to note that prosecutors are expected to act in the best interest of justice, not just to win cases. If the prosecutor believes that the case is not strong enough or they don't have enough evidence to secure a conviction, or if there are other factors such as unreliable victims, they may decide to dismiss the case as well. Additionally, a plea bargain failure can also be a reason for the case to be dismissed.
Learn more about Why prosecutors may decide to dismiss a criminal case here: https://brainly.com/question/28340352
#SPJ4
the illinois state legislature passes a law raising the speed limit on certain state roads. this law becomes part of a body of law known as ____
The Illinois state legislature passes a law raising the speed limit on certain state roads. this law becomes part of a body of law known as Statute law.
A statute is a piece of written law that the president signs after it has been approved by the legislature. Congress passes laws that become part of federal statute law, and the president of the United States signs them. To become a state law, an act must be authorized by the state legislature and signed by the governor.
They are used to regulate the system and compel compliance with the law. Legislation that has been adopted by a governing body of people is known as statutory law. They are created by the government and apply to all laws it passes, not just specific types of laws.
To learn more about Statutory law,
https://brainly.com/question/14612143
#SPJ4
what Rights in the constitution are being violated in the implementation of this war on drugs
Due to the U.S. war on drugs, millions of people have been criminalized, imprisoned, or have had their access to necessary resources and supports for leading healthy lives disrupted or completely removed.
What does constitution mean?It gives a general overview of the main state institutions and describes how they interact (for example, between the executive, legislature and judiciary). A constitution encapsulates the fundamental principles of a government. Once our constitution has been ratified, only the sovereign power has the capacity to change it. All laws, executive decisions, and judicial decisions must adhere to the constitution, which established the authority held by the various government organs.
Why constitution is important for a country?It decides how people and governments will communicate. The nation's citizens are all protected, and their basic rights are granted. It explains how the government will be chosen as well as who will be in charge of making important decisions. to define the persons in a society who are in charge of making decisions; to provide a set of fundamental rules that permit the bare minimum of social structure. It establishes the makeup of the government. to set limits on the demands that a government can make on its citizens.
To know more Constitution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
Should the system use shaming as a form of punishment in this modern society? Why or why not?
200 words please
Answer:
Shaming as a form of punishment has been used in societies for centuries, but it is not an effective form of punishment in modern society. Shaming is seen as a form of public humiliation, which can lead to long-term psychological damage. This type of punishment has been proven to be ineffective in deterring criminal behavior and has been known to cause more harm than good. Additionally, it is seen as a form of discrimination, as it disproportionately affects those who are already marginalized in society.
In addition to its ineffectiveness, shaming can also be seen as a form of revenge, rather than justice. It often involves punishing someone for a crime they may have committed, even if they have not been convicted in a court of law. This can lead to a lack of due process in the criminal justice system and can cause people to be unfairly targeted.
Ultimately, shaming as a form of punishment is not an effective way to deal with criminal behavior in modern society. It has been proven to be ineffective, can lead to long-term psychological damage, and can lead to a lack of due process in the criminal justice system. It is important to consider alternative forms of punishment, such as rehabilitation and education, that can be more effective in deterring criminal behavior.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes but not to harsh, shaming lets people know who they are and what theyve done.
Sorry for not using 200 words
Explanation:
Should prosecution for a crime in both state and federal courts be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause?
If you could remove from the Texas criminal code, what law would you remove and why?
Answer:
the death penalty
Explanation:
id take the death penalty away because taking one life because they took a life is no better because in the end 2 lifes are gone and only one person free to walk away and the toll on their mind i could only imagine.
which original supreme court justice studied law with hamilton?
Answer: Thurgood Marshall
Explanation: By 1929, Howard University had developed into a full-time law school under his encouragement and was the training ground for about a quarter of the nation's black law students. Houston's pupils at Howard University included Thurgood Marshall, the nation's first African American U.S. Supreme Court Justice. Hope this helps!
What does the Declaration of Independence say about right to revolution?ght to overthrow the government
Thomas Jefferson added the following phrase to the first clause of the Declaration of Independence: "When in the Course of Human Events.
Men establish governments in order to protect these rights, and those governments are legitimate because the people they are supposed to govern have consented to them. People have the right to change or abolish any type of government and institute a new one if it begins to act contrary to their goals.
However, when a long history of wrongdoings and usurpations that constantly strive to attain the same goal betray a desire to reduce them under utter despotism, it is their right and responsibility to topple such government and to establish new guards to secure their continuous protection. These Colonies have endured such painful sorrow.
Learn more about Declaration Visit: brainly.com/question/472238
#SPJ4
The illinois state legislature passes a law raising the speed limit on certain state roads. this law becomes part of a body of law known as?
what act made it illegal to plan any act which could depose the government?
Answer: the smith act
Explanation:
what legal rule is violated if a paralegal hears a client state they have hidden documentation that woudl have a negative impact on their case
Serious penalties, such as paralegal license suspension or revocation, fines, job loss, or, when there is criminal behavior, referral to the proper authorities, may be the outcome of legal ethics violations by paralegals.
What does ethics mean in legal terms?Ethics in the legal field describes how people choose to engage with one another. In philosophy, ethics outlines the nature of the obligations that people have to themselves because one another as well as what is beneficial to each person and society.
Why is legal ethics crucial?Lawyers and other court officials frequently have to choose between their personal interests and those of the people they represent. Legal ethics are crucial in assisting the practitioner in balancing these interests and working to advance good faith.
To know more about legal ethics visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28791848
#SPJ1
one main difference between bribery and reinforcement is the
Answer:
reinforcement is planned ahead whereas bribery is a negotiation during the occurrence of a challenging behavior
Hope this helps . . . was your question complete?
what does it mean to informally amend the constitution?
Any informal amendment to the constitution means to make an interpretation of the modification of the existing laws in the document related thereto.
Any amendment to the national constitution can be held as informal, whenever there is a modification in the existing laws that were naturally a part of the original constitution. Additionally, it is noteworthy to mention that any amendment is completely constitutional, even though it is an informal one. Modification of laws is an important aspect of the informal amendments being made.
Learn more about the amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/12124635
#SPJ4
u.s. supreme court case that established the idea of judicial review
The US is the supreme court case that established the idea of judicial review.
This theory was established by the court in Marbury v. Madison (1803). The Court had to determine which was the highest law of the land in this case: a Congress Act or the Constitution.
In Marbury v. Madison (1803), the Fourth Chief Judge of the United States John Marshall (1801–35) argued that the Supreme Court of America States had the authority to declare unconstitutional legislation passed by Congress. This is generally regarded as the beginning of the constitutional judicial review.
The notion of "judicial review" was created by Marbury v. Madison, which gives the supreme court the authority to declare acts of parliament unlawful. No component of the Constitutional, including the Fundamental Rights, was outside the scope of the Parliament's ability to change it, the SC said, but the "fundamental framework".
Learn more about the judicial review here:
https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
How many votes did each state have under the Articles of Confederation group of answer choices?
What is the difference between theory fact and law?
The theory is a broad explanation of a topic with deep analysis and specifications, fact is something that a view or a process is proven correct and accepted by the whole world. Law explains a topic shortly through definition and an equation.
Law is a small definition with a simple equation of a topic in a subject like mathematics and science it’s not an explanation. The laws can change according to new understandings and evolution.
The theory is a rational explanation of an object. Its function evolution and its features. The theory will have a hypothesis of a topic and if any advancement in that topic happens theory will get included. The theory provides facts and shows the unnoticed features present in a particular topic.
A fact is repeatedly observed and proven correct. Facts are considered true until they are proven void and once a process is a proven fact it is acceptable all over the world without any doubt.
To know more about theory
brainly.com/question/14543764
#SPJ4
a precedent is a decision that furnishes an example or authority for deciding subsequent cases involving similar legal principles or facts. (T/F)
A precedent provides a source of example for the ongoing cases which the Supreme Court will refer for any ideas. It is a legal principle that has been established in a prior case and is either persuasive or binding on a court or other tribunal when they decide on later cases with the same questions or facts.
Respect for precedent is the means through which common-law legal systems achieve their purpose of resolving cases in accordance with consistent, principled norms so that similar facts will result in similar and predictable decisions.
Common-law precedent is a third category of law, standing alongside statutory law (i.e., laws established by legislative bodies) and subordinate legislation, or regulatory law in the UK. The principle judges are supposed to precedents is known as stare decisis.
According to the common-law tradition, courts read statutes and apply precedent, which outlines how and why earlier judgments were resolved, to determine the law that applies to a case.
To know more about precedent
brainly.com/question/14816803
#SPJ4
how are home repair frauds and automobile repair frauds similar to one another?
Both home repair and auto repair frauds are similar in that they involve unscrupulous individuals or companies taking advantage of the trust and lack of knowledge of the consumer to overcharge or perform shoddy work.
In both cases, the fraudsters often target vulnerable individuals such as the elderly, low-income households, or people who are not familiar with the industry standards.
They may also use high-pressure tactics to convince the consumer to agree to unnecessary or overpriced repairs. Both types of frauds can result in significant financial losses for the victim, as well as safety hazards if the work performed is substandard.
To avoid falling victim to these types of scams, it is important to do thorough research on a company or individual before agreeing to any repairs, and to get multiple quotes for comparison.
To know more about financial losses click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29602673#
#SPJ11
Which part of the Constitution is called the Magna Carta Mcq?
Part 3
Part 4
Part 2
Part 5
Out of the provided alternatives, it may be concluded to state that the Part 3 of the Constitution is also regarded as the Magna Carta. Therefore, the option A holds true.
The national constitution of the United States is divided into multiple parts. This division into parts is done with the primary intention of easing the interpretation of the laws. One such parts, i.e., the Part 3 of the American Constitution is named as Magna Carta. This part of the constitution includes the fundamental rights granted to the US citizens.
Learn more about constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ4
does great britain drive on the left side of the road?
Yes, it is completely appropriate to mention that the people in Great Britain tend to drive on the left side of the road, as per their traffic rules and regulations.
The traffic rules in the Great Britain are similar to those followed in countries like India, whereas, they are completely in contrast when it comes to the regulations of the United States. Since a majority of the public in the Great Britain is right-handed, the traffic rules maintain that driving should be done on the left-side of the road.
Learn more about traffic rules here:
https://brainly.com/question/28879065
#SPJ4
What texas law enforcement agency has statewide jurisdiction?
The Texas Ranger Division texas law enforcement agency has statewide jurisdiction.
Not all Texas law enforcement officers are the same, despite the fact that they all have statewide jurisdiction, wear badges, and swear to protect and serve. From homes to the roadway, from the municipal to the state level, there are several groups, each of which manages a variety of tasks specifically assigned to them.
This also applies to law enforcement personnel. Around 92, or fewer than 4%, of Texas' 2,750 law enforcement organizations have civil service. Local, regional, and federal law enforcement organizations often fall into one of three categories.
Police or sheriff departments are examples of local law enforcement organizations. The state or highway patrol is one example of a state agency. The U.S. Security Detail and the FBI are examples of federal organizations.
Learn more about texas rangers here:
https://brainly.com/question/3585067
#SPJ4
______a set of laws in the south that enforced racial segregation
what act made it illegal to plan any act which could depose the government?
u.s. supreme court case that established the idea of judicial review
The US is the supreme court case that established the idea of judicial review.
This theory was established by the court in Marbury v. Madison (1803). The Court had to determine which was the highest law of the land in this case: a Congress Act or the Constitution.
In Marbury v. Madison (1803), the Fourth Chief Judge of the United States John Marshall (1801–35) argued that the Supreme Court of America States had the authority to declare unconstitutional legislation passed by Congress. This is generally regarded as the beginning of the constitutional judicial review.
The notion of "judicial review" was created by Marbury v. Madison, which gives the supreme court the authority to declare acts of parliament unlawful. No component of the Constitutional, including the Fundamental Rights, was outside the scope of the Parliament's ability to change it, the SC said, but the "fundamental framework".
Learn more about the judicial review here:
brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
Article i, section 8, clause 3 of the united states constitution __________.
Answer: The Congress shall have Power . . . To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; . . . While the Supreme Court . . .
what is the law of freedom of religion, speech, press, petition, and assembly
What does this mean the enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people?
It states that the people, not the government, own all rights not included in the Constitution. In other words, the people's rights go beyond those that are enumerated in the Constitution.
The Rights Retained by the People aid in our comprehension of the causes and progression of this disparity in the protection of human rights. By focusing on the Constitution's Ninth Amendment, it also offers a platform for redefining constitutional interpretation and better defending all human rights.
It is important to remember that the Constitution's enumeration of some rights does not negate or diminish other rights that individuals may also hold. It declares that the people, not the government, own any rights not specifically bestowed by the Constitution.
To learn more about Retained rights in the Constitution,
https://brainly.com/question/29746174
#SPJ4
the maximum fine for a first non-driving alcohol-related offense of possession or consumption of
The maximum fine for a first non-driving alcohol-related offense of possession or consumption of alcohol by a minor can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific laws in place.
In general, the fine for a first offense is usually considered a relatively minor one and may be less than for repeat offenses.
In the United States, for example, the maximum fine for a first offense of possession or consumption of alcohol by a minor is typically around $500, although it can be higher or lower depending on the state and the specific circumstances of the case.
Some states also include community service or alcohol education classes as part of the penalty for a minor in possession or consumption charge.
To learn more about alcohol
https://brainly.com/question/4698220
#SPJ4