Enter a formula in cell B10 to return the value of 35000 if the net profit after tax cell B9 is greater than or equal to 470000 or 100 if it is not

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

P(AUB)=P(A)+P(B)-P(A∩B)

191/400=7/20+P(B)-49/400

P(B)=191/400+49/400-7/20=240/400-7/20=12/20-7/20=5/20=1/4

The value of P(B) is 1/4.

The probability is defined as the possibility of an event is equal to the ratio of the number of favorable outcomes and the total number of outcomes.

For an experiment having q number of outcomes, the number of favorable outcomes can be denoted by p. The formula to calculate the probability of an event is as follows:

Probability(Event) = Favorable Outcomes/Total Outcomes = p/q

Given data as :

P(A) = 7/20,

P(A∪B) = 191/400,

P(A∩B) = 49/400 ,

P(AUB) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A∩B)

Substitute the values of P(A), P(A∪B) and P(A∩B) in formula,

191/400 = 7/20 + P(B) - 49/400

Rearrange the terms in the equation,

P(B) = 191/400 + 49/400 - 7/20

P(B) = 240/400 - 7/20

P(B) = 12/20 - 7/20

P(B) = 5/20

P(B) = 1/4

Hence, the value of P(B) is 1/4.

Learn more about probability here :

brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ5

Answer:

y= -0.8x + 4

Midpoint is 0,4

Answer:

We conclude that there is no difference in potential mean sales per market in Region 1 and 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a random sample of 12 supermarkets from Region 1 had mean sales of 84 with a standard deviation of 6.6.

A random sample of 17 supermarkets from Region 2 had a mean sales of 78.3 with a standard deviation of 8.5.

Let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] = mean sales per market in Region 1.

[tex]\mu_2[/tex]  = mean sales per market in Region 2.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu_1-\mu_2[/tex] = 0      {means that there is no difference in potential mean sales per market in Region 1 and 2}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : > [tex]\mu_1-\mu_2\neq[/tex] 0      {means that there is a difference in potential mean sales per market in Region 1 and 2}

The test statistics that will be used here is Two-sample t-test statistics because we don't know about population standard deviations;

                            T.S.  =  [tex]\frac{(\bar X_1 -\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+ {\frac{1}{n_2}}} }[/tex]   ~  [tex]t__n_1_+_n_2_-_2[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X_1[/tex] = sample mean sales in Region 1 = 84

[tex]\bar X_2[/tex] = sample mean sales in Region 2 = 78.3

[tex]s_1[/tex]  = sample standard deviation of sales in Region 1 = 6.6

[tex]s_2[/tex]  = sample standard deviation of sales in Region 2 = 8.5

[tex]n_1[/tex] = sample of supermarkets from Region 1 = 12

[tex]n_2[/tex] = sample of supermarkets from Region 2 = 17

Also, [tex]s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)\times s_1^{2}+(n_2-1)\times s_2^{2} }{n_1+n_2-2} }[/tex]  = [tex]s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(12-1)\times 6.6^{2}+(17-1)\times 8.5^{2} }{12+17-2} }[/tex] = 7.782

So, the test statistics =  [tex]\frac{(84-78.3)-(0)}{7.782 \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{12}+ {\frac{1}{17}}} }[/tex]  ~   [tex]t_2_7[/tex]

                                   =  1.943  

The value of t-test statistics is 1.943.

Now, at a 0.02 level of significance, the t table  gives a critical value of -2.472 and 2.473 at 27 degrees of freedom for the two-tailed test.

Since the value of our test statistics lies within the range of critical values of t, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region.

Therefore, we conclude that there is no difference in potential mean sales per market in Region 1 and 2.

Answer:

A) Null Hypothesis; H0: μ = $41,500

Alternative hypothesis; H1: μ > $41,500

B) Reject H0 is t > 2.821433

C) t = 1.79

D) there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that residents of Wilmington, Delaware have more income than the national average

Step-by-step explanation:

A) The hypotheses is given as;

Null Hypothesis; H0: μ = $41,500

Alternative hypothesis; H1: μ > $41,500

B) From online t-score calculator attached using significance level of 0.01 and DF = n - 1 = 10 - 1 = 9, we have;

t = 2.821433

Normally, when the absolute value of the t-value is greater than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis. However, when the absolute value of the t-value is less than the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Thus, if t > 2.821433, we will reject the null hypothesis H0.

C) Formula for the test statistic is;

t = (x' - μ)/(s/√n)

We have, μ = 41500, x' = 47500, s = 10600, n = 10

t = (47500 - 41500)/(10600/√10)

t = 1.79

D) So, 1.79 is less than the t-critical value of 2.821433. Thus, we will fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that residents of Wilmington, Delaware have more income than the national average

We have

[tex]2+\dfrac54+\dfrac{11}{16}+\dfrac{23}{64}+\cdots=\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{3\cdot2^n-1}{4^n}[/tex]

(notice that each denominator is a power of 4, and each numerator is one less than some multiple of 3, in particular 3 times some power of 2)

Recall for [tex]|x|<1[/tex], we have

[tex]\displaystyle\frac1{1-x}=\sum_{n=0}^\infty x^n[/tex]

So we have

[tex]\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{3\cdot2^n-1}4=3\sum_{n=0}^\infty\left(\frac12\right)^n-\sum_{n=0}^\infty\left(\frac14\right)^n=\frac3{1-\frac12}-\frac1{1-\frac14}=\boxed{\frac{14}3}[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the expression in rectangular coordinate as x²+y²−4x=0, in order to write the given expression in polar coordinates, we need to write the value of x and y as a function of (r, θ).

x = rcosθ and y = rsinθ.

Substituting the value of x and y in their polar form into the given expression we have;

x²+y²−4x=0

( rcosθ)²+( rsinθ)²-4( rcosθ) = 0

Expand the expressions in parenthesis

r²cos²θ+r²sin²θ-4rcosθ = 0

r²(cos²θ+sin²θ)-4rcosθ = 0

From trigonometry identity, cos²θ+sin²θ =1

The resulting equation becomes;

r²(1)-4rcosθ = 0

r²-4rcosθ = 0

Add 4rcosθ to both sides of the equation

r²-4rcosθ+4rcosθ = 0+4rcosθ

r² = 4rcosθ

Dividing both sides by r

r²/r = 4rcosθ/r

r = 4cosθ

Hence the correct equation in polar coordinates is r = 4cosθ

Answer: No, the orders are not independent.

Step-by-step explanation:

If event 1 has some possible outcomes, suppose that we choose a given outcome 1 with a probability P1, and event 2, also with different possible outcomes, we can select an outcome 2, that has a probability P2, and the two events are independent (meaning that the outcome in event 1 does not affect the outcome in event 2, and vice versa)

Then the probability of outcome 1 and outcome 2 happening at the same time is equal to the product of their individual probabilities.

P = P1*P2.

In this case, event 1 is the selection of the pizza, and outcome 1 is the selection of the square pizza, with a probability of 55%.

Event 2 is the selection of the drink, outcome 2 is the order of a soft drink, with a probability of 72%.

If those two events were independent, then the probability that a customer orders a square pizza and a soft drink would be:

P = 0.55*0.72 = 0.396 (or 39.6%)

But we know that the actual probability is 48%.

So this is larger, which means that the outcomes are not independent.

a. y = 2.5x + 2000

b. The variable x represents the domain because the domain is the range of the possible x values.

c. x ≥ 0

d. The variable y represents the range because the range is the range of the possible y values.

e. y ≥ 2000

f. y = 2.5(25) + 2000

  y = 62.5 + 2000

  y = $2062.50

g. 2500 = 2.5x + 2000

   2.5x = 500

   x = 200

h. I am sorry I cannot make the graph but hopefully you can figure out how to make it using the info I have given in the above parts of the problem :)

Answer:

Final population after 10 years

= 288911718

Step-by-step explanation:

Present population p = 258,316,051

Rate of growth R%= 1.12%

Number of years t= 10 years

Number of times calculated n = 10

Final population A

= P(1+r/n)^(nt)

A= 258,316,051(1+0.0112/10)^(10*10)

A= 258,316,051(1+0.00112)^(100)

A= 258,316,051(1.00112)^100

A= 258,316,051(1.118442762)

A= 288911717.6

Approximately A= 288911718

Final population after 10 years

= 288911718

Answer: n is a positive odd number.

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok, we know that the function is something like:

f(x)=a(x+k)^1/n + c

In the graph we can see two thigns:

All the values of the graph are positive values (even for the negative values of x), but in the left side we can see that the function decreases and is different than the right side.

So this is not an even function, then n must be an odd number (n odd allows us to have negative values for y = f(x) that happen when x + k is negative).

Also, we can see that the function increases, if n was a negative number, like: n = -N

we would have:

[tex]f(x) = \frac{a}{(x+k)^{1/N}} + c[/tex]

So in this case x is in the denominator, so as x increases, we would see that the value of y decreases, but that does not happen, so we can conclude that the value of n must be positive.

Then n is a positive odd number.

Answer:

D) Positive Even Integer

Step-by-step explanation:

just did it

Answer:

7. 20 + 5 + 3/10 + 6/100

8. 7 + 4/10 + 2/100 + 5/1000

Step-by-step explanation:

We are writing two numbers in expanded form, to help, we can use the guide above both numbers. Expanded form is all about breaking apart a number by place value and putting them in an additional sequence.

Let's look at 7, 25.36.

There are the tens, ones, tenths, and hundredths place being used, therefore :

20 + 5 + 3/10 + 6/100

We can do the same for 8, 7.425.

There are ones, tenths, hundredths, and thousandths being used, therefore :

7 + 4/10 + 2/100 + 5/1000

Answer:

990/23

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1

Multiply the denominator by the whole number

23 × 43 = 989

Step 2

Add the answer from Step 1 to the numerator

989 + 1 = 990

Step 3

Write answer from Step 2 over the denominator

990/23

Answer:

25 CAN be written as a fraction.

=> 250/10 = 25

Square root of 14 is 3.74165738677

It is NOT POSSIBLE TO WRITE THIS FULL NUMBER AS A FRACTION,  but if we simplify the decimal like: 3.74, THEN WE CAN WRITE THIS AS A FRACTION

=> 374/100

-1.25 CAN be written as a fraction.

=> -5/4 = -1.25

Square root of 16 CAN also be written as a fraction.

=> sqr root of 16 = 4.

4 can be written as a fraction.

=> 4 = 8/2

Pi = 3.14.........

It is NOT POSSIBLE TO WRITE THE FULL 'PI' AS A FRACTION, but if we simplify 'pi' to just 3.14, THEN WE CAN WRITE IT AS A FRACTION

=> 314/100

.6 CAN be written as a fraction.

=> 6/10 = .6

The intervals would contain approximately 95% of the measurements will be (120, 280). Then the correct option is C.

The Gaussian Distribution is another name for it. The most significant continuous probability distribution is this one. Because the curve resembles a bell, it is also known as a bell curve.

In numerical documentation, these realities can be communicated as follows, where Pr(X) is the likelihood capability, Χ is a perception from an ordinarily circulated irregular variable, μ (mu) is the mean of the dispersion, and σ (sigma) is its standard deviation:

The interval for 95% will be given as,

Pr(X) = μ ± 2σ

Pr(X) = 200 ± 2(40)

Pr(X) = 200 ± 80

Pr(X) = (200 - 80, 200 + 80)

Pr(X) = (120, 280)

The intervals would contain approximately 95% of the measurements will be (120, 280). Then the correct option is C.

More about the normal distribution link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/12421652

#SPJ5

A certain​ animal's body temperature has a mean of 94.72° F and a standard deviation of 0.57°F. Convert the given temperatures to z scores.

a. 93.52 °F  b. 95.22 °F      c. 94.72 °F

Answer:

a. z = - 2.1053

b. z = 0.87719

c. z = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

The population mean μ = 94.72

The standard deviation σ = 0.57

the formula for calculating the standard normal z score, which can be represented as:

[tex]z= \dfrac{\overline x - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

For  a.

The sample mean [tex]\bar x[/tex] = 93.52

The z score can be computed as follows:

[tex]z= \dfrac{\overline x - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]z= \dfrac{93.52 - 94.72}{0.57}[/tex]

[tex]z= \dfrac{-1.2}{0.57}[/tex]

z = - 2.1053

For  b.

The sample mean [tex]\bar x[/tex]  =  95.22    

[tex]z= \dfrac{\overline x - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]z= \dfrac{95.22 - 94.72}{0.57}[/tex]

[tex]z= \dfrac{0.5}{0.57}[/tex]

z = 0.87719

For  c.

The sample mean [tex]\bar x[/tex]  = 94.72

[tex]z= \dfrac{\overline x - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]z= \dfrac{94.72 - 94.72}{0.57}[/tex]

[tex]z= \dfrac{0}{0.57}[/tex]

z = 0

Answer:

YES

Step-by-step explanation:

1 million minutes = 1.9 years

An average man can live upto 78 years.

So, an average man can easily live upto 1,000,000.

Answer:

There will be (365 x 24 x 60) minutes each year.

and that is 525600.

and 525600 x 78 is 40,996,800.

so, It is definitely more than 1 million minutes.

Hop it helps!

Bye!

Answer:

-20x / (x-12) = y

Step-by-step explanation:

3/x  - 5/y  = 1/4

Multiply each side by 4xy to clear the fractions

4xy ( 3/x  - 5/y  = 1/4)

Distribute

12y - 20x = xy

Subtract 12y from each side

-20x = xy -12y

Factor out y

-20x = y(x-12)

Divide each side by (x-12)

-20x / (x-12) = y

Answer:

Ordinary Least Square (OLS) for the multiple regression model involves selecting parameters of a straight line function that will minimize the sum of the squares of the variance in the given dataset and those forecasted by the straight-line function.

Cheers

Answer:

$3385 per week

Step-by-step explanation:

so, he gets $370 plus 4.5% of what he is selling.

$67000 = 100% of selling

1% = 100%/100 = 67000/100 = $670

4.5% = 1% × 4.5 = 670 × 4.5 = $3015

so, he gets $370 + $3015 = $3385 per week

━━━━━━━☆☆━━━━━━━

▹ Answer

80

▹ Step-by-Step Explanation

(2²)³ + (2³)² ÷ 4

Rewrite:

2⁶ + 2⁶ ÷ 2²

Divide:

2⁶ + 2⁴

Factor:

(2² + 1) * 2⁴

Evaluate:

(4 + 1) * 2⁴

Calculate:

5 * 16

= 80

Hope this helps!

CloutAnswers ❁

━━━━━━━☆☆━━━━━━━

Answer: .0228

Step-by-step explanation:  z = (6 − 10)/√4 = −2

P(X < 6) = .0228

Answer:

16x⁴+16x³-12x²-32x-16

Step-by-step explanation:

(8x²-4x-8)(2x²+3x+2)

= 16x⁴+24x³+16x²-8x³-12x²-8x-16x²-24x-16

= 16x⁴+16x³-12x²-32x-16

Dan is Correct by concluding  that adults spend a mean of 3 hours each day doing leisure and sports activities. because [tex]3.08[/tex] hours or [tex]3.09[/tex] hours which are the mean time of sample A and B  is approximately equal to 3 hours

From the question we are told that:

Total Sample size [tex]n=500[/tex]

Dan's mean  [tex]\=x_D= 3hr[/tex]

Bret's mean   [tex]\=x_D= 4hr[/tex]

Generally, the  Total hours spent doing leisure and sports activities  is mathematically given by

For Sample A

[tex]T_a=(1*70)+(2*90)+(3*135)+(4*140)+(5*65)\\\\[/tex]

[tex]T_a=1540 hours[/tex]

For Sample B

[tex]T_b=(1*80)+(2*80)+(3*130)+(4*135)+(5*75)[/tex]

[tex]T_b=1545[/tex]

Therefore

Mean Time spent doing leisure and sports activities by an American Adult

For Sample A

[tex]T_A=\frac{T_a}{n}[/tex]

[tex]T_A=\frac{1540}{500}[/tex]

[tex]T_A=3.08[/tex] hours

[tex]T_A \approx 3[/tex] hours

For Sample B

[tex]T_A'=\frac{T_b}{n}[/tex]

[tex]T_A'=\frac{1545}{500}[/tex]

[tex]T_A'=3.09[/tex] hours

[tex]T_A' \approx 3[/tex] hours

In conclusion

Dan is Correct because [tex]3.08[/tex] or [tex]3.09[/tex] which are the mean time of sample A and B is approximately equal to [tex]3[/tex]

Learn More about this at

https://brainly.com/question/14355235

Answer:

67.49

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the number of HCF be x.

Let the cost be y.

You are given 2 points of a line: (15, 32.84) and (43, 79.04).

Now we find the equation of the line that passes through those points.

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

y - 32.84 = [(79.04 - 32.84)/(43 - 15)](x - 15)

y - 32.84 = (46.2/28)(x - 15)

y - 32.84 = 1.65(x - 15)

y = 1.65x - 24.75 + 32.84

y = 1.65x + 8.09

Now we let x = 36 and solve for y.

y = 1.65(36) + 8.09

y = 67.49

Answer:

.33

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey there!

1 / 3

= .333333333

.33 rounded to the nearest hundredth

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Garden: [tex]x^2+18x+81[/tex]

One Bag: [tex]x^2 - 81[/tex]

Requires

Determine the number of bags to cover the whole garden

This is calculated as thus;

[tex]Bags = \frac{x^2+18x+81}{x^2 - 81}[/tex]

Expand the numerator

[tex]Bags = \frac{x^2+9x+9x+81}{x^2 - 81}[/tex]

[tex]Bags = \frac{x(x+9)+9(x+9)}{x^2 - 81}[/tex]

[tex]Bags = \frac{(x+9)(x+9)}{x^2 - 81}[/tex]

Express 81 as 9²

[tex]Bags = \frac{(x+9)(x+9)}{x^2 - 9\²}[/tex]

Evaluate as difference of two squares

[tex]Bags = \frac{(x+9)(x+9)}{(x - 9)(x+9)}[/tex]

[tex]Bags = \frac{(x+9)}{(x - 9)}[/tex]

Hence, the number of bags is [tex]Bags = \frac{(x+9)}{(x - 9)}[/tex]

Work Shown:

A = P*(1+r)^t

A = 21450*(1+(-0.08))^5

A = 21450*(1-0.08)^5

A = 21450*(0.92)^5

A = 21450*0.6590815232

A = 14137.29867264

A = 14,137.30

Notice how I used a negative r value to indicate depreciation rather than growth.

Answer:

9 is a positive number and -10 is negative. Positive numbers are bigger than negative numbers so yes 9 is bigger than -10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Yes it is

Step-by-step explanation:

here is how the numbers appear numerically

-10, -9, -8, -7, -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

Answer:

vertical asymptotes

x=6, x=-6

horizontal asymptotes

y=0

zeros (0,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = 6x / ( x^2 - 36)

First factor

f(x) = 6x / ( x-6)(x+6)

Since nothing cancels

The vertical asymptotes are when the denominator goes to zero

x-6 = 0   x+6=0

x=6          x= -6

Since the numerator has a smaller power than the denominator (1 < 2), there is an asymptote at y = 0

To find the zeros, we find where the numerator = 0

6x=0

x=0

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow y=\dfrac{6x}{x^2-36}[/tex]

The h orizontal asymptote

As x has less degree than x²

Vertical asymptote

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

2,8 to 4,12 has a rise of 4 and a run of 2.

4/2 = 2

The slope is 2.

Remember rise/run!

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

We take take two points and use the slope formula

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

m = (12-8)/(4-2)

   = 4/2

   = 2