Excerpt from To Build a Fire This passage is an excerpt from Jack London's famous short story describing the experience of a man hiking in the middle of an extremely cold winter morning. With his faithful companion a husky dog, the man and the dog walk through the winter morning hoping to meet his associates later that day. All this the man knew. The old–timer on Sulphur Creek had told him about it the previous fall, and now he was appreciating the advice. Already all sensation had gone out of his feet. To build the fire he had been forced to remove his mittens, and the fingers had quickly gone numb. His pace of four miles an hour had kept his heart pumping blood to the surface of his body and to all the extremities. But the instant he stopped, the action of the pump eased down. The cold of space smote the unprotected tip of the planet, and he, being on that unprotected tip, received the full force of the blow. The blood of his body recoiled before it. The blood was alive, like the dog, and like the dog it wanted to hide away and cover itself up from the fearful cold. So long as he walked four miles an hour, he pumped that blood, willy–nilly, to the surface; but now it ebbed away and sank down into the recesses of his body. The extremities were the first to feel its absence. His wet feet froze the faster, and his exposed fingers numbed the faster, though they had not yet begun to freeze. Nose and cheeks were already freezing, while the skin of all his body chilled as it lost its blood. But he was safe. Toes and nose and cheeks would be only touched by the frost, for the fire was beginning to burn with strength. He was feeding it with twigs the size of his finger. In another minute he would be able to feed it with branches the size of his wrist, and then he could remove his wet foot–gear, and, while it dried, he could keep his naked feet warm by the fire, rubbing them at first, of course, with snow. The fire was a success. He was safe. He remembered the advice of the old–timer on Sulphur Creek, and smiled. The

Answer:

B

Explanation:

all of the word are similar with conventional except for peculiar

I hope this helps.

The words which are alike to each other are given in options (A): "Conventional," (C): "Conservative," (D): "typical" and (E): "traditional". However, the odd one from the given options is option (B): "peculiar."

Conventional is a noun that refers to someone or something that is generally accepted or something associated with a convention. The bride's choice to wear white on her wedding day is an illustration of the convention. The usual practice of using pesticides to raise fruits and vegetables is one example.

A political philosophy known as conservatism emphasizes tradition and depends on the individual to uphold society. Conservative people and those who hold conservative views are resistant to innovation and change.

The word "typical" is used to describe someone or something that demonstrates the most common traits of a given type of person or thing and is hence an excellent representation of that type.

Something that adheres to a long-standing tradition, style, or custom is referred to as traditional. The custom of eating turkey as the standard or approved Thanksgiving meal is an example of tradition. A formal furniture style that doesn't adapt to trends or the seasons is an example of conventional.

But,  Peculiar is out of the ordinary or unusual; it is strange. a person who is considered strange due to their peculiar appearance or demeanor.

Eccentric, erratic, weird, outlandish, quaint, singular, strange, and distinctive are some popular synonyms for peculiar. All of these adjectives refer to "departing from what is usual, expected, or normal," but unusual denotes a strong distinction.

Hence, option (B) is the odd one out.

Check out the link below to learn more about peculiar;

https://brainly.com/question/2601754

#SPJ2

Answer:During the banquet, Macbeth sees the ghost of Banquo sitting at his place at the table. He is horrified. Lady Macbeth reassures the guests that it is a momentary fit and tells Macbeth to stop. The ghost disappears and Macbeth is calm.

Explanation:

Answer:

The use of blank verse and enjambment intensifies the contemplative and meditative mood of the poem. Blank verse allows for freedom of form, enhancing the tone of the poem, which shifts from being hopeful to being hopeless.

The use of enjambment helps hold the reader’s interest across lines:

    To him who in the love of Nature holds

    Communion with her visible forms, she speaks

    A various language; for his gayer hours

Explanation:

Plato/Edmentum

Answer:

The poem's introspective and meditative atmosphere is enhanced by the use of blank verse and enjambment. The versatility of form provided by blank verse enhances the poem's tone, which changes from hopeful to depressing.

Explanation:

this is what I put

Answer:

topic sentence

Explanation:

will be b bb bb

[tex] \: \: [/tex]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation: Both protagonist and antagonist can change if they are signs of change and at the ending, he changes but you need to be a little more specific about your question and also you can do it :)

Answer:

sorry ay dont anderstand

Answer:

number two is the third bullet point and number three is the second bullet point

The hospital scene in the book is meant to demonstrate how much the reunion of Darry and Ponyboy is important for both of them to understand each other. In the film, the scene is set up to show only that they both had a concern for each other.

We can arrive at this answer because:

In the book, while it's clear that the two brothers care about each other and are happy to see each other again, they use that moment to expose the problems in their relationship. Ponyboy feels that Darry hates him and Darry doesn't know how to express himself and show his worries and pressures without appearing abusive.

This is the moment in the book, where these issues are debated and intensified, allowing the reader to understand the positioning and meaning of each character.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/24817486

Paragraph 2 contributes to the structure of the interview in that: B. It explains how the setting affected the rescue.

In paragraph 2 of NOAA's Big Miracle Worker, we learn of the interview with the biologist, David Withrow. In paragraph 2 of the interview, Withrow spoke extensively of the weather condition in the area where the rescue was to be made.

The temperature was very low and this drew the interest of a lot of people to the rescue of the whales.

So, paragraph 2 explains how the setting affected the rescue.

Learn more about the setting here:

https://brainly.com/question/5660357

Answer:

Assists identity theft victims to report their issue and to recover.

Explanation:

Hope it helps you:))))))

have a good day

Answer:

Would you like something to drink, sir?

Explanation:

Answer:

B

Explanation:

that would be the wrong way to make this type of argument. the answer is False

The addressing alternative opinions in a rude or belittling manner is an effective strategy for making an argument. This statement is false. Thus, option (b) is correct.

What is argument?

The term argument refers to the a person dissatisfy to the other person. A person share own point of view to other person. The another person not agree to the other person opinion. The argument to exchange of opinion but another person not satisfy the opinion. The person are not agree to each and other as situation of conflict.

The opposition person denied opinion with disrespect to another person is such kind of wrong behavior show.  The person rude belittling manner in argument to other person is not effective strategy. The strategy in business purpose are effective not conflict behavior.

Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about on argument, here:

https://brainly.com/question/9860191

#SPJ2

Answer:

Descriptive linguistics is the study of how language is constructed. Within this field of study, the words phonology, morphology, and syntax are often used

Explanation:

2

i haven't seen my friend since she moved away to California last fall.

Answer: Option 2

Explanation:

It is in first person point of view because it uses the I pronoun, not the,they,her,she,theirs,yours etc.

I hope that helps :)

Answer:

The prompt is asking if driving age should be increased.

Answer:

1. I dislike you. I love you.

2. The kids were playing to much and they were getting on my nerves. I punished both of them.

3. The school is broken down. It has nice teachers.

Explanation:

Tip put a period where it sounds like you need to pause. Works most of the time :)

HOPE IT HELPS

Answer:

1) I dislike you. I love you.

2) The kids were playing too much and they were getting on my nerves, so I punished both of them.

3) The school is broken down. It has nice teachers.

Explanation:

Separate clauses, or statements, should be either separated into different sentences or by a comma and a word like "so" or "and". For example, instead of "The weather was nice I went on a walk" it could be "The weather was nice, so I went on a walk." (usually used for cause and effect) or "The weather was nice, and I went on a walk." (two related things) or "The weather was nice. I went on a walk." (used for more separate statements) Hope this helps!

Yes your sentence is correct but you have add "in" in place of within

In English language, a conjunctive adverb that joins two (2) independent clauses is generally preceded by a: B. semicolon

An adverb can be defined as a word that is used in English language to modify a verb, adjective, or another adverb.

A conjunctive adverb is also referred to as an adverbial conjunction or subordinating adverb and it can be defined as an adverb that is used to join two (2) independent clauses or sentences and it is generally preceded by a semicolon.

Some examples of a conjunctive adverb include the following:

Here is an example of a conjunctive adverb in a sentence:

In conclusion, we can deduce that "thus" is preceded by a semicolon in the example above.

Read more on conjunctive adverb here: https://brainly.com/question/18219269

Answer:

Climactic order

Explanation:

Answer:

dispatcher is when you call 911 and then the dispatch one area of the first responders

Explanation:

Answer:

After reading Ch. 7 and 8 in THiNK: Critical Thinking and Logic Skills for Everyday Life, how would you describe, in your own words, the differences between ...

Explanation:. Veracity and construction are important factors in evaluating an argument.

Answer:

f

Explanation:

In the radio version of ''A Matter of Fact'', one will be able to hear and experience the sounds of sea waves and volcanic eruptions when the characters of the story are on their route between South Africa and England.

The radio version of ''A Matter of Fact'' is an official adaptation of the story written by Rudyard Kipling, an English writer, in the same name. Three journalists are the main characters of the original story as well as the radio adaptation, when they are on their way to a sea journey.

While the journalists are sailing from South Africa to England via sea, they get to encounter and experience sea waves throughout their journey, and in a part of their journey, they also get to hear the sounds of volcanic eruptions that happen at a nearby island.

Therefore, the significance regarding ''A Matter of Fact'' has been aforementioned.

Learn more about ''A Matter of Fact'' here:

https://brainly.com/question/25863683

#SPJ6

Answer:

wrapper .. closed syllable

Resign ...open syllable

moment..... open syllable

Honor ...closed syllable

knives....closed syllable

Answer:

6) generation gap

Explanation:

Think about where the blank space is and what words would even makes sense. "legal in my family" isn't grammatically correct, "upload in my family" doesn't make sense...at all, "loud in my family" is grammatically incorrect, "access in my family" makes sense, though it is not the best answer we are looking for the the present choices. "Feature in my family" makes no sense, neither does "subscribe or unsuitable." Maturity *could* work if it was maturity but that is not what this question is asking for.

This leave "generation gap in our family" which makes the most sense. The child is being raised on technology and uses social media while the father still uses old ways of gathering information like newspapers.

Answer:

Explanation:

1. "I couldn't hear the film because the man next to

me was eating his uggy so loudly."

In this sentence, uggy is a noun because it can be used in place as a noun. Lets try a different noun.

"I couldn't hear the film because the man next to me was eating his popcorn so loudly."

Yep, that makes sense!

2. "Unfortunately, I uggied on some ice and crashed

into a tree."

Verb. "Unfortunately, I slid on some ice and crashed." That makes sense, so it's being used as a verb.

3. "When Pierre and Madeleine met, they fell uggily

in love and got married one month later."

Adverb. "When Pierre and Madeleine met, they fell madly in love and got married on month later."

And so on. If you understand the concept, you can get the rest of the questions.

Answer/Explanation:

At first glance, the new nationalism of conservatives will seem benign and even uncontroversial. In his book, “The Case for Nationalism,” Rich Lowry defines nationalism as flowing from a people’s "natural devotion to their home and to their country." Yoram Hazony, in his book “The Virtue of Nationalism,” also has a rather anodyne definition of nationalism. It means "that the world is governed best when nations agree to cultivate their own traditions, free from interference by other nations."

There is nothing particularly controversial at all about these statements. Defined in these terms, it sounds like little more than simply defending nationality or national sovereignty, which is why Lowry, Hazony, and others insist their definition of nationalism has nothing to do with the most virulent forms involving ethnicity, race, militarism, or fascism.  

Here's the problem. I suppose any of us can take any tradition that has a definite history and simply redefine it to our liking. We could then give ourselves permission to castigate anyone who doesn't agree with us as "misunderstanding" or even libeling us. But who actually is responsible for the misunderstanding here? The people who are trying to redefine the term, or the people who remind us of nationalism's real history and what nationalism actually has been in history? Which raises an even bigger question: Why go down this road at all?

If you have to spend half of your time explaining, "Oh, I don't mean that kind of nationalism," why would you want to associate a venerable tradition of American civic patriotism, national pride, and American exceptionalism at all with the various nationalisms that have occurred in the world? After all, American conservatives have argued that one of the great things about America was that it was different from all other countries. Different from all other nationalisms.