The McFadden Act of 1927 and other laws that tried to address long-standing concerns about the concentration of financial activity and concerns that large banking organizations operating in multiple states could not be adequately supervised were largely responsible for these restrictions.
Why did we remove restrictions on banking between states?
After it became clear that restrictions on interstate banking restricted banks' ability to expand regionally and made them vulnerable to local economic crises, regulations were eventually relaxed.
What resulted from the Riegle-Neal Act?
Banks can open branches in other states thanks to the Interstate Act, also known as the Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.
Learn more about banking here:
https://brainly.com/question/25642105
#SPJ4
What was the outcome of the Casey Anthony case?
Casey was not found guilty of first-degree murder, aggravated child abuse, and aggravated manslaughter of a kid. She WAS found guilty of 4 misdemeanor counts of providing false information to law enforcement though.
Hope this helps!!!! : D
Alexander hamilton said that the power of the supreme court rested on the power of ______.
Answer:
Judgement is the answer.
Read the following article by Sykes and Matza on Techniques of Neutralization. Then, respond to the following question:
How do Sykes and Matza’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur? Provide an (anonymous, i.e., do not identify someone by name) example of someone that you know personally or a case that has been well reported in the media where neutralizations are linked to crime or other problem behavior.
These arguments were dubbed "neutralization strategies" by Sykes and Matza because they allowed wrongdoers to psychologically clean up or neutralize their misdeeds, convincing themselves that they weren't actually criminals.
A general description of when neutralization leads to crime is as follows: according to Neutralization and Drift Theory, minors feel obligated to the law. Most of the time, this legal responsibility remains in force. When this commitment is stressed, however, young delinquents tend to slip towards criminality.
Who are Sykes and Matza?Sykes and David Matza developed what is now known as the neutralization theory. According to Sykes and Matza, when criminals consider doing illegal activities, they employ language strategies to alleviate their guilt. This allows them to perpetrate crime while preserving their self-esteem.
Gresham Sykes and David Matza, criminologists, proposed the hypothesis in 1957, claiming that juvenile delinquents alternate between law-abiding and law-breaking conduct.
Learn more about Neutralization:
https://brainly.com/question/14211760
#SPJ1
When a defendant faces a negligence lawsuit, what defenses are available?.
when a defendant faces a Negligence lawsuit , the defenses are
.assumption of riskcomparative faultcontributory negligencenecessityNegligence is a cause of action under general tort law. A negligence claim can arise when a person suffers damage because another party was negligent or did not exercise the same level of care that the average person would use in the same or similar circumstances.
Defences avaliabile in Negligence are
Risk Assumption: Risk assumption is a type of legal defense that can be used against claims of negligence. Essentially, the presumption of the risk defense is that the plaintiff knew the risks involved in a particular activity, but continued to participate in the activity despite the danger, and therefore should not be allowed to seek compensation for injuries. says. If the defendant wins this defense, the plaintiff cannot seek damages in the lawsuit.
Plaintiffs must also have taken these risks voluntarily before undertaking any activity.
Contributory Negligence: Contributory negligence may exist if the plaintiff is found to have committed negligence and contributed to his own damages. In such scenarios, both the defendant and the plaintiff acted improperly or negligently, which combined to the detriment the plaintiff. Had the plaintiff been less negligent than the defendant, they might have avoided the situation entirely and suffered no injury. may have collided with another driver's vehicle.
To learn more about Negligence, refer :
https://brainly.com/question/20619986
#SPJ4
because police always observe the crimes that occur, they are at an advantage in being able to quickly arrest offenders. True/False
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Police cannot always observe crimes that are committed at all times, as that would be impossible (most crimes occur in secret).
what similarities and differences do you find among grotius, wilson, and posner? which argument do you find most compelling and why? what are the strengths and weaknesses of international law and organizations? are they effective at promoting peace and cooperation?
Hugo grotius : Known as the father of international law. He developed the rules governing the conduct of war
Posner : According to Posner, states will not reliably comply with customary international law.
Wilson : He sought to take international law out of the hands of states and give it to the true sovereign.
Strengths of international law are
They promote unity and strength.Settle various disputesDiscuss important world ordersMaintain a global system including trade, commerce and governance.Weakness of international law are
Lacks effective law machinery
The International Court of Justice has no authority.Weak sanction and efficiency.They help in promoting peace and stability but due to certain issues it gets into backend. With proper control it can definitely be improved.
To know more about International law from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/1449228
#SPJ4
What is the influence of crime investigation TV series on the public's perception of law enforcement work and courtroom
procedures called?
The influence of crime investigation TV series on the public's perception of law enforcement work and courtroom procedures is called the CSI effect.
The exaggerated portrayal of forensic science on crime television programs like CSI: Crime Scene Investigation affects public perception in a number of different ways, including the "CSI effect."
Most frequently, it alludes to the idea that juries have started to demand more forensic evidence in criminal trials, placing the actual burden of proof on the prosecution.
Although this is a widely held opinion among American legal professionals, some researchers contend that while regular CSI viewers may have a diminished regard for circumstantial evidence, crime shows are unlikely to have such an impact.
To learn more about CSI effect visit: https://brainly.com/question/12000529
#SPJ9
5. Which Supreme Court case established that evidence obtained through unreasonable searches and seizures, in violation of the Fourth
Amendment, may not be used in state courts for state law criminal prosecutions?
Chandler v. Browning
Wilson v. Griswold
Keller v. Florida
O Mapp v. Ohio
Supreme Court case established that evidence obtained through unreasonable searches and seizures, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, may not be used in state courts for state law criminal prosecutions in Mapp v. Ohio. The correct option is (D).
What do you mean by the Fourth Amendment?
The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution safeguards citizens from arbitrary government searches and seizures.
Only those searches and seizures that are ruled legally unreasonable are protected by the Fourth Amendment, though.
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Fourth Amendment's safeguards against unreasonable searches and seizures were tightened, making it unlawful to introduce non-warranted evidence into a state court criminal prosecution.
Therefore, the supreme Court case established that evidence obtained through unreasonable searches and seizures, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, may not be used in state courts for state law criminal prosecutions in Mapp v. Ohio.
To know more about the Fourth Amendment, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28246295
#SPJ1
What is the major weakness of the literal approach to statutory
interpretation?
The major weakness of the literal approach to statutory interpretation is that It might produce outcomes that look unfair and go against the wishes of Parliament.
What is meant by the statutory interpretation?Statutory construction, also known as statutory interpretation, is the process through which courts apply and interpret the law.
Using the legal principle of statutory interpretation, a judge tries to comprehend and apply the law to a specific situation. Judges apply this approach because it's possible that municipal, state, and federal laws don't cover particular circumstances that arise after they're written. Additionally, judges use statutory interpretation to determine the applicability of little-used or outdated legislation in current cases.
Read more on statutory law here: https://brainly.com/question/864793
#SPJ1
To what extent do you think the criminal justice system response to the pandemic has had an impact on the provision of public safety? Here you must look at the crime rates during the pandemic and measures introduced during the pandemic such as curfews and the ban of alcohol.
Globally speaking, COVID-19 has significantly changed criminal justice systems. It has affected crime trends, the ability of the police to catch specific crimes like child abuse, and how the justice system handles the pandemic's effects.
Major policy and practise changes have been started at an unprecedented rate by some leaders in the justice system. Technologies have been used to enable remote working, new working practises have been implemented, and protocols have been modified to give high risk offences priority.
Leaders are optimistic about the advantages of the changes, but there are some worries as well. As an illustration, there is a delay in some areas, such as the courts and probation services, and it is still unclear how COVID-19 will affect the justice system in the long run.
To know more about COVID-19:
brainly.com/question/28908700
#SPJ1
How does the U.S. government influence the market economy?
It tells companies how much to charge for all goods.
It provides public goods and services.
It prevents states from collecting taxes.
It buys companies in foreign markets.
69 points man
for the memes
Answer:
It provides public goods and supplies
Explanation:
Governments can create subsidies, taxing the public and giving the money to an industry, or tariffs, adding taxes to foreign products to lift prices and make domestic products more appealing. Higher taxes, fees, and greater regulations can stymie businesses or entire industries.
Logic models are used to
A logic model is essentially a methodical and visual means to convey and communicate your knowledge of the connections between the tools you have at your disposal to run your program, the actions you want to take, and the modifications or outcomes you wish to accomplish.
What are Logic models?Generally, Logic models are explanations of the chain of causes and effects that are thought to lead to a certain conclusion that is of interest.
In conclusion, Although they may be presented in a narrative format, logic models more often than not take the form of graphical depictions of the "if-then" linkages that exist between the many components that lead to the end.
Read more about Logic models
https://brainly.com/question/17372961
#SPJ1
_____ refers to the number of clients for whom a probation officer is responsible at any one time.
Caseload refers to the number of clients for whom a probation officer is responsible at any one time.
Why is managing the caseload crucial?It is primarily a tool for the client's immediate benefit as well as for professional development and supervision.
Note that the supervisee's type and amount of work is outlined by caseload management.
Therefore, based on the above, the term Caseload is one that is seen as the quantity of families or children assigned to a specific worker in a particular amount of time.
Learn more about Case from
https://brainly.com/question/1046966
#SPJ1
True or False? All crashes are accidents.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
the charging document for a felony crime is the indictment; in a misdemeanor criminal case, this charge is called the . a. complaint b. information c. affidavit d. subpoena
The indictment is the charging document for a felony offence; the complaint is the charging document in a misdemeanour criminal case. A pleading that brings criminal charges against a defendant is known as a charging document. It—not an arrest—marks the start of a criminal investigation.
A charging document is any declaration made by the Commission that an individual or group has broken one of the laws under its purview. A felony prosecution must start with an indictment in the federal system according to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
In Minnesota, a police officer may also issue a citation for a misdemeanour or petty misdemeanour. Many of them are also frequently referred to as "traffic tickets" or "traffic citations," Charge-making documents include complaints, informations, and indictments.
To know more about document click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/7444017
#SPJ4
what is philosophy?
Answer:
Philosophy is the systematized study of general and fundamental questions, such as those about existence, reason, knowledge, values, mind, and language. Such questions are often posed as problems to be studied or resolved.
Explanation:
hope this helped you
Evaluate the legal nature of the Letters of Credit and Performance Guarantee and identify the statute laws that govern it.
The major reason for describing the constitutional validity of the Letters of Credit and Performer Guaranteed and identifying the statute laws which govern are to solve issues and operations.
What is laws?The term “law” refers to a system of rules created by authorities and governments. The law's objective is to safeguard citizens against the abuses of others. The law exists on three levels: local, state, and national.
The structure are the description are the solve in the activities, and it was in the issuance are the letter of credit and performances, according to the laws that are in the legal constitutional provisions.
Hence, the significance of the laws aforementioned.
Learn more about on laws, here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ1
Do you agree with the restrictions placed on “Freedom to Assembly”? Explain why/why not.
Freedom of Assembly permits citizens to raise issues, call for change, and get responses from public figures. Without the right to assemble, there are fewer avenues for citizens to access information between elections and chances for engagement in transparent government.
Can the right to assemble be restricted?
A public authority may occasionally impose restrictions on your freedom of assembly and association. This only applies in situations when the authorities can demonstrate that the action was justified in order to safeguard public safety or national security. avert chaos or criminality. Gatherings that pose other imminent hazards to public safety may also be stopped or prevented by authorities.
To know more about Freedom of Assembly click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/7954791
#SPJ1
5. Beth is driving her car down the street when Tom, who was behind a bush, tries to run across the street. Beth’s car strikes Tom. Beth knew that her car’s brakes were bad.
1. Beth is responsible for the accident.
2. Beth is not negligent.
3. Tom is the only negligent party to this happening.
4. None of the above.
Beth is responsible for the accident is the correct answer.
The which means of a twist of fate may be defined in several methods; however, the maximum primary definition is whilst a voluntary action results in harm or death.
The act that causes injury or death isn't generally deemed dangerous and is generally performed without severe consequences. accident: an occasion that affects in injury or ill fitness. incident: close to omit: an occasion no longer causing harm,
however, has the potential to motive damage or unwell fitness (in this steering, the term near pass over will include risky occurrences)the principle distinction between 'twist of fate' and 'incident' is the former does bring about private harm or assets damage. even as the latter would not result in private damage. while we call something a "twist of fate" it means that no one is at fault and that no one, such as the driving force, bears responsibility for the outcome. The time period "crash," alternatively, is more unique in phrases of the motion's outcome without the unpreventable implication.Learn more about accident here: https://brainly.com/question/24452126
#SPJ1
How would America be different if the Ludlow Amendment was passed?
Answer:
This proposed amendment to the Constitution would have required that any presidential candidate receive support from two-thirds of the states in order to be elected. This would have had a profound impact on American politics and would likely have led to a more decentralized and federalized country.
Discuss the following question (300 word minimum)...
This Ted Talk was given 4 years ago. We are currently seeing the issues that can arise from countries threatening nuclear war (Russia's invasion of Ukraine). Don't forget, Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, and Ukraine became the world's third largest possessor of nuclear weapons from the fall of the Soviet Union. As a result, Ukraine agreed to become a Non Nuclear Weapon State giving up all of their 1,900+ nuclear weapons.
Why is important for the U.S. to monitor WMDs throughout the world? The U.S. has WMDs; so, should we have the authority to tell other countries that they can't have them? Do you think Russia would have invaded Ukraine if they had not agreed to give up their nuclear arsenal almost 28 years ago?
In the past, countries that have various proliferation capabilities have done so primarily to stave off challenges to regional security and secondarily to discourage American engagement.
A nation's decision to develop WMD is exclusively dependent on the threat that other nations pose to that nation. No other nation may meddle in it. However, the creation of WMD is resisted in order to preserve international harmony and prevent further conflicts.
What are WMDs?A chemical, radiological, biological, nuclear, or other weapon that have the potential to kill many people, seriously injure them or significantly disrupt both man-made and natural structures, as well as the biosphere, is considered a weapon of mass destruction.
China, France, India, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States are the eight countries.
Most are in Russia's arsenal, followed by those of the United States.
Learn more about WMDs, from:
brainly.com/question/14586437
#SPJ1
Mandy volunteered in a month-long sleep study at the university last year. She was asked to participate because of her unusual sleep habits and neurological history. Part of the sleep study included her sleeping in a room inside the lab for the entire month. She was videotaped while she slept. Now, 13 months later, police are trying to charge Mandy with possession and use of illegal drugs. It turns out she was using drugs during her stay at the sleep lab. Her drug use was recorded in the lab videos. She's not sure how or why the police saw the videos. She knew she was being videotaped, although she was told it was only for the study and that no one outside the lab would view the footage.
Would the video evidence be helpful in proving the case? (Answer in one to two sentences. Explain your reasoning.)
No, the video cannot be used as evidence in this instance because Mandy was only videotaped as part of an experiment and her agreement only applied to the sleep study.
She was also certain that, as per the agreement between her and the group who carried out the experiment, the tapes would not be made public.
What is neurology?The field of medicine known as neurology is responsible for the diagnosis and care of all disorders and illnesses affecting the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves.
The discipline of neuroscience, the scientific study of the nervous system, is very important to neurological practice.
Learn more about neurology, from:
brainly.com/question/7165863
#SPJ1
you should never make a u-turn near the top of a hill where you cannot see or be seen from both directions for ___ feet.
You must never perform a u-turn at the top of a mountain if you can't see or be seen for 500 feet in both directions.
A mountain is an elevation section of the Earth's crust with steep sides and exposed bedrock. Although definitions fluctuate, a mountain differs from a plateau in that it has a smaller summit area and is generally higher than a hill, rising at least 300 meters above the surrounding plain. A few mountains have isolated summits, but the vast majority are part of mountain ranges. Mountains are produced by tectonic processes, erosion, or volcanism, which operate on temporal frames of up to hundreds of millions of years. After mountain development stops, mountains are gradually flattened through weathering, slumping, and other forms of mass wastage, as well as erosion by river and glaciers.
Learn more about perform here
https://brainly.com/question/13175022
#SPJ4
The Directorate of Intelligence is
O is an intelligence division of the FBI
O is an agency in the Department of Homeland Security
O in charge of administering the Patriot Act
is the head of the FBI
The Directorate of Intelligence (DI) of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is in charge of analyzing the information gathered by CIA special agents.
What is the directorate of operations' purpose?The collection of human intelligence, also known as HUMINT, is the responsibility of the Directorate of Operations. They carry out covert action as directed by the president when it is required and in unique circumstances.
Who makes up the community of intelligence?The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), and the intelligence components of the five DoD services are the nine elements of the Department of Defense. the Air Force, Space Force, Army, Navy, and Marine Corps.
Learn more about CIA here:
https://brainly.com/question/9227515
#SPJ1
What ethical considerations do human resource teams need to take into account
when developing harassment or affirmation action policies?
Being a company's moral compass, Human Resource teams who uphold high moral standards and try to create a fair workplace will keep employees' confidence and draw in new applicants.
Here are six HR ethics rules that businesses may adhere to in order to master the art of moral decision-making and establish themselves as a valued resource for their staff.
1) Maintain information privacy: HR professionals have access to a variety of sensitive data about employees, including social security numbers and medical records. You may relax knowing that the information about your firm is safe by making sure that paper documents and computer systems are secure.
2) Put diversity and inclusion policies into practice Nowadays, discussions regarding diversity frequently centre on efforts to recruit people of all races, classes, and genders.
3) Recognize potential conflict of interest
4) Act as an ethical HR leader: This entails having faith in your moral judgments and convincingly articulating them to staff members.
5)Prioritize your professional growth: HR is a topic that is continuously evolving, particularly as new discussions emerge and technology continues to transform how we work.
6) Be aware of the law: HR professionals must take decisive action as an organization's representative and hold violators of the law accountable.
What is a good HRM ethics example?
For instance, there are some rights that cannot be compromised, such as the right to privacy and the right to appropriate recompense for the labor performed.
Therefore maintaining ethics is very much important by human resource teams.
To learn more about human resource teams from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/13135400
#SPJ1
why isn't full employment the same as zero unemployment
Answer:There are different types of unemployment, and some are unavoidable or even necessary for a functioning labor market.
Explanation:At any given time, jobs are being created and destroyed as industries evolve, and the transition from old jobs to new is not seamless.
unhappy with the decision passed by a lower court in a civil rights violation case, anastasia files her case with the united states supreme court, hoping that the court will take it up for review. in this case, the supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case. select one: a. writ of habeas corpus b. writ of mandamus c. writ of certiorari d. writ of mens rea
The supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case BY writ of Certiorari.
hence, option C is correct.
What is writ of certiorari?
This is a request that the Supreme Court can order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review. In this if atleast 4 judges hear the case it will be heard and discussed. It can be applied by any member of public.
Sometimes it is also called as judicial Writ. It can be granted when amounts to abuse of discretion or lack or excess of jurisdiction. It cab be granted in any civil, criminal or judicial cases.
Hence, The supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case BY writ of Certiorari.
hence, option C is correct.
To learn more about writ of certiorari from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/12106865
#SPJ4
7. Economists may disagree because they have
different
pre
TEMPER
a. hunches about the validity of alternative
theories.
Prestan
Milita
Quick Qu
b. judgments about the size of key parameters.
c. political philosophies about the goals of public
policy.
d. All of the above.
Economists may disagree because they have different all of the above. The correct option is D.
What do economists disagree about?There is widespread disagreement among economists about the appropriate size of government, the power of trade unions, the negative effects of unemployment and inflation, equitable income distribution, and whether or not a tax-cut policy is desirable. On these issues, economists are divided.
Economists may reach different scientific conclusions. To put it another way, economists may disagree on the validity of option positive theories about how the world really works.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about economists here:
https://brainly.com/question/14299791
#SPJ1
as long as the child is in a safety seat, it doesn't matter if they are strapped into a front passenger seat or a back passenger seat.
How can we use stasis theory on Depp V Heard trial. What are ways this issue has been framed?
Answer:
Explanation:
To help you develop a plan for an argument, using stasis theory can help in your invention stage.In a discussion of a problem or issue, stasis theory asks you and your fellow debater to come to an agreement on an issue. For example, people have various opinions about sexism and racism. Let's take sexism, for example. Some people do not feel that sexism exists while others are adamant that it does. To come to an agreement, you could apply stasis theory by first asking if it really exists or happens (fact). Next, you and your friend would need to define and discuss what acts make up or constitute sexism (definition). Then, you have to look at the character or nature of the act. Is the issue hurtful or not (quality: right or wrong)? Finally, is there something that should be done about this concern (policy: plan of action)? These questions help develop the issue at hand. Background:Stasis theory was developed by an ancient rhetorician named Hermagoras, an ancient Greek in the 3rd century BC. He proposed four questions to help analyze or study a problem or issue, and those questions can be used as an invention help. Aristotle, another ancient Greek and philosopher and rhetorician from the 4th century, is often associated with the idea of stasis theory, and he used it primarily in the invention stage. The theory was later refined by Cicero, and orator, and other others.