Answer:
true
Explanation:
because the gang still are going to need to get money
ead the following article by Sykes and Matza on Techniques of Neutralization. Then, respond to the following question:
How do Sykes and Matza’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur? Provide an (anonymous, i.e., do not identify someone by name) example of someone that you know personally or a case that has been well reported in the media where neutralizations are linked to crime or other problem behavior.
Sykes and Matze called these exonerations techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally clean or countervail their crimes and convert themselves into that they aren't really criminals.
What are techniques?Accomplishment is the ability to carry out a task with determined results. The knowledge base technique is any systematic way of acquiring information about a scientific nature. Ability to treat such details or use such social movement, and good piano state.
Sykes and Matze’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur in conditions techniques of neutralization because, by reacting to them, offenders were able to mentally
Therefore, Sykes and Matze called these justifications techniques of neutralization
Learn more about techniques here:
https://brainly.com/question/17130704
#SPJ1
ASSIGNMENT
Frank lives and works in a city. He owns numerous tracts of land in a county outside the city where he hunts and fishes. Mike, who has never met Frank, starts living in a cabin in a remote section of Frank's land. At first Mike just stayed on the week-ends, but for the last 22 years he has made the cabin his home and made improvements to it. Mike now claims the cabin and surrounding area he possesses is his property.
Explain what factors represent each element of adverse possession. Will Mike get title to the land?
The 22 years, without interruption, that Mike used Frank's land and the fact that Frank did not claim or oppose it establish the elements of possession and time of adverse possession. The fact that Mike gave a function to the used land represents the element called the skillful thing of adverse possession.
Milke will obtain title to the land.
How to explain the elements of adverse possession?Skillful thing: Mik gave a social function to a land that had potential but was not being used.Time: Make spent a lot of time without an interruption in this land.Ownership: Frank, as the owner of the land, has not claimed ownership in 22 years.Adverse possession is a legal way of acquiring the property rights of a private asset that has been without social function for a long time.
In this case, to establish adverse possession on a piece of land, someone must invade some privately owned land, build a residence and live there for many years uninterrupted.
Furthermore, the legal owner of these lands must not claim them during these years, allowing another individual to continue using them for a long time.
Adverse possession is a way to avoid the accumulation of properties, mainly those that have no function and are not used by their owners.
Although adverse possession is a legal system, it does not apply to public goods, as the law considers that these goods belong to the entire community and are used by it in different ways.
Learn more about public goods:
https://brainly.com/question/14664702
#SPJ1
Miranda v. arizona if we are all charged with knowing the law, how could the court find that miranda needed to be informed of his rights by the state? could miranda be tried again for the same crime? what justification would the court have in imposing such a burden on the police? would they not be practicing law by giving such legal advice? was excluding the evidence (the confession) the only sanction available to the u.s. supreme court? can you think of some other sanctions that would still allow such evidence to be used but protect the innocent person who might be subjected to such treatment.
Miranda vs . Arizona occurred in 1996. the In this the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects before police questioning, must be properly informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Explain Miranda vs Arizona case.
In this case it was established that the Police need to make you aware about your Miranda Rights after an arrest and before questioning. It was established under 5 and 6 amendments of the US constitution.
It has provided detainees with the right to not to self incriminate along with the right to humanise their life.In the case of Miranda, he was tried and convicted again, without using the confession against him.In the final Outcome his conviction was overturned.This was the final result of the Miranda vs Arizona case.
To know more about Miranda vs Arizona from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/13483624
#SPJ4
The signs of being impaired are always obvious true or false?
Answer:
Explanation:False
The statement is false as signs of impairment may not always be obvious and can vary depending on the individual and substance consumed.
Sometimes the symptoms of impairment are subtle. While some actions or physical characteristics, such as slurred speech, clumsy movements or bloodshot eyes, can indicate impairment not all symptoms are immediately apparent. It may be more difficult to identify some people's impairments because they can partially conceal or mask them.
The substance consumed, a person's tolerance and other factors can all affect how impairment appears. It is crucial to understand that impairment can have an impact on cognitive function, judgment and coordination even when there are no overt symptoms. Therefore, determining someone's impairment solely based on outward symptoms may not always be accurate.
learn more about signs of impairment here
brainly.com/question/31567687
#SPJ2
The prosecutor kept saying that he has to meet her burden of proof with might be difficult in this case what does that mean
The prosecution has the burden of proof in a criminal trial. The defendant must be proven guilty of the allegations against them by the prosecution to the jury without a shadow of a doubt.
What does prosecution mean?
The decision to pursue a case is made by the magistrate based on the police report that was provided, and the prosecutor is then chosen. The prosecutor is chosen to act as the state's or the government's representative in any criminal case.
Such actions are started by the prosecuting attorney, who could be the federal United States Attorney, the state Attorney General, or the district attorney in question.
Learn more about prosecution from here:
https://brainly.com/question/23179189
#SPJ1
In your own words, describe why it’s critical to always have auto insurance. Provide at least two examples of situations where you might need insurance.
Auto Insurance is always necessary for auto driver as well as his passengers.
Life Insurance, car Insurance, health insurance etc. are needed insurance for everyone .
Auto insurance is very important for drivers and it is madintory for everyone in every states. benefits of auto insurance are
Auto insurance helps passengers :health and personal injury insurance can help pay for medical expenses if you are injured in an accident. It also helps in recovering passenger costs due to accidents. This coverage helps pay for hospital visits, medical expenses, and surgery.
Auto insurance helps protect yourself.Liability insurance is required by law, but many people drive without it. Uninsured Motorist Insurance helps pay for medical bills if you are run over by an uninsured driver. This coverage is mandatory in some states and optional in others.
Adequate auto insurance coverage does more than meet legal requirements. Auto insurance helps protect your car, wallet and even equipment.
personally everyone needed some basic insurance policies which are following:
Life insuranceCar insurancehealth insuranceTo learn more about insurance , refer :
https://brainly.com/question/25855858
#SPJ4
peer pressure __in why some teens get in a car with an impaired driver?
Answer: Some kids are a bad influence
Explanation: According to my studies, many teenagers build up a ball of rage inside their head. As a result, they peer pressure poor innocent children to feel happy. This is called a pyschopath.
the ruling in miller v. california is a landmark decision by the u.s. supreme court in which the court redefined its definition of what constitutes obscenity. this definition has been translated into what is referred to as the miller test, a test for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled obscene, in which case the material is not protected by the first amendment and therefore becomes illegal. the miller test was developed in 1973 and has three parts, what are they?
The Miller test is the standard test which explains what constitues expression of obscenity.
Explain more about the Miller Test?
It was given by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. California (1973).It majorly dealt with many online and real time obscene cases. It is a standard test that is still used to determine many cases
The three parts which it include are:
appeals to the prurient interest of the people describes sexual conduct in a offensive way (patent offensiveness)lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.This is how Miller test is used and broken into many parts.
To know more about Miller test from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/14139451
#SPJ4
Johnny is a forensic scientist. He tests for gunshot residue. Which of the following tests might Johnny use?
test, which should turn the material red if gunshot residue is present. For another item, he only has a
which is known to return conclusive results even on very small amounts.
Johnny uses the
small amount of material to test, so he chooses
Johnny uses the small amount of material to test.
How can gunshot residue be found using a test?Identifying GSR has been done since the late 1970s using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). For GSR analysis and identification in a laboratory setting, this method is the most trustworthy. The first step in this process is to use a swab that has been moistened with diluted nitric acid to swipe the suspect's hands, clothes, belt, or shoes.Other techniques, like atomic absorption, simply detect the quantity of bulk elements present and do not account for their form, making scanning electron microscopy the sole approach available to validate the presence of GSR particles.To learn more about GSR particles refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28282704
#SPJ1
There has been a shift from approaches to the concept of failed states that generally lack a description of what these states should actually look like to approaches that lump together all these countries without taking into consideration the unique characteristics and weaknesses of each unit. Discuss
In regards to the discussion on the shift from approaches to the concept of failed states that generally lack a description of what these states should actually look like, it is because Nation-states collapse because internal conflict prevents them from providing their citizens with beneficial political services.
What does it mean for a nation to be considered a failed state?A failed state is a political entity that has broken down to the point where the fundamental requirements and obligations of a sovereign government are no longer fulfilled (see also fragile state and state collapse).
A failing state is unable to carry out public policy, provide adequate infrastructure, and protect civil liberties and human rights. Residents of a failed state lack both physical security and effective political and economic structures.
Therefore, Failed State is seen as a situation of "state collapse" - for example, a state that is unable to carry out its essential development and security functions and that lacks effective control over its territory and borders.
Learn more about failed states from
https://brainly.com/question/12295180
#SPJ1
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
Since Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. This scenario best exemplifies the use of electronic monitoring in home confinement.
What is an electronic surveillance system?A criminal's whereabouts may always be verified thanks to the EMS technique and tool. Using this technology, local government authorities can place a range of restrictions on a criminal. In recent years, defendants have been managed by EMS before trials.
It should be taken into consideration that the surveillance method known as "electronic tagging" uses an electronic gadget that is attached to a person. Several nations use an electronic tag that is fastened to the person's ankle as part of their bond or probation conditions. It is used in the fields of immigration and healthcare as well.
Learn more about electronic monitoring device from
https://brainly.com/question/6605512
#SPJ1
See full question below
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
a. wiretapping
b. shock incarceration
c. electronic monitoring
d. multichanneling
Read the following article by Sykes and Matza on Techniques of Neutralization. Then, respond to the following question:
How do Sykes and Matza’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur? Provide an (anonymous, i.e., do not identify someone by name) example of someone that you know personally or a case that has been well reported in the media where neutralizations are linked to crime or other problem behavior.
Sykes and Matze called these circumstances techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally clean or neutralize their crimes and strain themselves into that they aren't really criminals.
What are techniques?Skill is the ability to carry out a task with discovered results. The knowledge base technique is any systematic way of acquiring information about a scientific nature. Ability to treat such details or use such social movement, and good piano skillfulness.
Sykes and Matze’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur justifications techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally
Therefore, Sykes and Matze called these justifications techniques of neutralization
Learn more about techniques here:
https://brainly.com/question/17130704
#SPJ1
I need help with this but no one is helping me, It has to be 500 words.
MeToo is a social movement against s-exual abuse, s-exual harassment, and r-ape culture, in which people publicize their experiences of s-exual abuse or s-exual harassment.
The cases that emerged from Metoo movement:
1. 2006 Tarana B Case
Tarana B, a social activist and community organizer, began using phrase "MeToo" in 2006, on My-space to promote “empowerment through empathy” among women of color who have been s-exually abused. She was raped and s-exually assaulted. Through this movement she came out in public to seek justice for women like her.
2. 2015 Ambra G Case
Italian model Ambra reported a case and accused Weinstein of touching her inappropriately, he was arrested but later released by court due to lack of evidence.
Apart from these two cases, there were a lot of cases filed across the globe not just in US. Few other popular cases like 2017 Alyssa case and Johny-Amber case also fall under cases which resulted from Metoo movement.
Issue of Consent and Criminal Liability
The feminist slogan “no means no” became widely accepted and written into law. Youngsters came of age seeing themselves as more egalitarian in relationships and appreciative of how communication enhances intimacy. One expression of such expression has been development of the idea of affirmative consent. Affirmative consent is a knowing, voluntary and mutual decision among all participants to engage in intimacy.
Consent has been one of then factors in deciding Criminal liability in Metoo cases and therefore the movement also aims at changing the definition of consent itself.
Do r-ape shield laws work?
A question was posed on r-ape shield laws by the protestors when offenders were acquitted in several Metoo cases due to lack of evidence against them. However, a r-ape shield law limits the introduction of evidence by a defendant charged with r-ape. The evidence not allowed in concerns the victim's past s-exual conduct. Evidence against them is always allowed and it depends on work of investigative agencies to gather evidence against offenders.
Examples of some r-ape shield law include Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which is a federal law and among states Arizona's Criminal Code includes a statute entitled, “Evidence Relating to Victim's Chastity.”
To know more about Metoo:
brainly.com/question/28708683
#SPJ1
in eby, the supreme court stated allowing contractors to make a claim against architects would do which of the following:
In eby, the Court Decided that enabling contractors to sue architects would accomplish which of the following: produce a detrimental impact on the architect's impartiality or legal responsibility to the owner.
A court is any person or institution, frequently a government institution, with the jurisdiction to arbitrate legal disagreements between parties and administer justice in civil, penal, and administrative in conformity with the rule of law. Courts are the central mechanism of conflict resolution in both civil and common law legal systems, and it is widely assumed that everyone has the opportunity to bring their claim before such a court. Similarly, persons accused of a crime have the opportunity to provide a defense in court. The judiciary is the judicial system that interprets and executes the law. A venue is the location of a court.
learn more about legal responsibility here
https://brainly.com/question/27883274
#SPJ4
pete's pizza employs quincy as a delivery driver. pete's guarantees that an order will be delivered within thirty minutes or there is no charge, and insists that its drivers meet the limit. one night, while making a delivery, quincy is caught in a traffic jam. to deliver the pizza within the thirty-minute time limit, quincy drives onto a sidewalk and hits ruth, a pedestrian. is pete's liable to ruth for her injuries? is quincy liable to ruth? why or why not?
In this case, Pete is liable for the damages to Ruth
Why does this happen?
According to the law, employers are liable for the actions of their employees. It is the duty of the employer to provide time to time training to their employees and teach them to be limit and rules and regulations. Damage caused by Quincy will be liability of Pete's Pizza now.
It will be considered as a mistake of the company, and currently, the company is liable for the actions of their employees. The needs of the company would differ and has contracts, conditions with the other company as well.
Hence, In this case Pete is liable for the damages to Ruth
To learn more about Liability from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/9503055
#SPJ4
After graduating from college you are offered what you believe is your dream job. You are working in the field in which you earned your degree and get a fantastic salary. As part of the job offer, you have been asked to sign a non-compete agreement in which you agree to not work for any other competing company for five years after you leave this company (whether voluntarily or involuntarily). You happily sign the agreement and begin work. However, within the first year, you are miserable and begin to look for another job. If you find another position at a competing company, may this company prevent you from taking it under the non-compete agreement you signed?
Yes, according to the non-compete agreement you signed when you started this job, the current employer may forbid you from accepting a position at a rival business.
What is non-compete agreement?The Covenant Not to Compete Act governs non-compete clauses in Texas. A non-compete agreement must be included in an otherwise enforceable contract that has reasonable restrictions on the amount of time, place, and type of activity that is being prohibited in order to be legal under the Act.
Under California law, non-compete agreements are not enforceable. The non-compete agreement with Legal Nature can still be used to stop an employee from luring clients and staff members away from the employer, nevertheless.
Non-compete clauses in employment contracts forbid employees from working for "competitor" businesses while they are currently employed or after. These contracts often impose limitations on employees in terms of time, profession, and/or location.
A non-compete clause, often known as a non-compete agreement, is a legal provision that normally forbids you from working for or joining a competitor.
Learn more about non-compete agreement, here
https://brainly.com/question/13708955
#SPJ1
This is the official attorney responsible for representing the state/people agains
accused individuals.
O judge
O public defender
O prosecutor
O private attorney