The Illinois state legislature passes a law raising the speed limit on certain state roads. This law becomes part of a body of law known as: statutory law.

It states that the people, not the government, own all rights not included in the Constitution. In other words, the people's rights go beyond those that are enumerated in the Constitution.

The Rights Retained by the People aid in our comprehension of the causes and progression of this disparity in the protection of human rights. By focusing on the Constitution's Ninth Amendment, it also offers a platform for redefining constitutional interpretation and better defending all human rights.

It is important to remember that the Constitution's enumeration of some rights does not negate or diminish other rights that individuals may also hold. It declares that the people, not the government, own any rights not specifically bestowed by the Constitution.

To learn more about Retained rights in the Constitution,

https://brainly.com/question/29746174

#SPJ4

Established judicial review Marbury v. Madison gave the supreme court power to declare laws unconstitutional.

Chief Justice John Marshall's ruling in Marbury v. Madison established the judicial review principle, a crucial component of the "checks and balances" system designed to prevent any one arm of the national govt from becoming overly strong.

The most well-known Supreme Court authority, judicial review—or the power to find a legislative or executive action to be in violation of the Constitution—is not contained in the Constitution's text. This theory was established by the court in Marbury v. Madison (1803).

The concept of judicial review—the ability of federal courts to rule that legislative and executive actions are unconstitutional—was established by the U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803). The unanimous judgment.

Learn more about Marbury v. Madison here:

https://brainly.com/question/11982017

#SPJ4

One reason prosecutors may decide to dismiss a case is the reputation of the defense attorney. If the prosecutor believes that the defense attorney has a reputation for effectively defending their clients or winning cases, they may decide to dismiss the case to avoid the possibility of losing in court.

When a prosecutor decides to dismiss a case, it means that they are choosing not to pursue criminal charges against the defendant. This can happen for a variety of reasons.

One possible reason is the reputation of the defense attorney. If the prosecutor is familiar with the defense attorney and knows that they have a reputation for being skilled and effective at defending their clients, the prosecutor may decide that it's unlikely that they will be able to secure a conviction in court. In such a scenario, the prosecutor may decide to dismiss the case in order to avoid the risk of losing and conserving resources.

It's important to note that prosecutors are expected to act in the best interest of justice, not just to win cases. If the prosecutor believes that the case is not strong enough or they don't have enough evidence to secure a conviction, or if there are other factors such as unreliable victims, they may decide to dismiss the case as well. Additionally, a plea bargain failure can also be a reason for the case to be dismissed.

Learn more about Why prosecutors may decide to dismiss a criminal case here: https://brainly.com/question/28340352

#SPJ4

Answer:

Shaming as a form of punishment has been used in societies for centuries, but it is not an effective form of punishment in modern society. Shaming is seen as a form of public humiliation, which can lead to long-term psychological damage. This type of punishment has been proven to be ineffective in deterring criminal behavior and has been known to cause more harm than good. Additionally, it is seen as a form of discrimination, as it disproportionately affects those who are already marginalized in society.

In addition to its ineffectiveness, shaming can also be seen as a form of revenge, rather than justice. It often involves punishing someone for a crime they may have committed, even if they have not been convicted in a court of law. This can lead to a lack of due process in the criminal justice system and can cause people to be unfairly targeted.

Ultimately, shaming as a form of punishment is not an effective way to deal with criminal behavior in modern society. It has been proven to be ineffective, can lead to long-term psychological damage, and can lead to a lack of due process in the criminal justice system. It is important to consider alternative forms of punishment, such as rehabilitation and education, that can be more effective in deterring criminal behavior.

Explanation:

Answer:

Yes but not to harsh, shaming lets people know who they are and what theyve done.

Sorry for not using 200 words

Explanation:

A precedent provides a source of example for the ongoing cases which the Supreme Court will refer for any ideas. It is a legal principle that has been established in a prior case and is either persuasive or binding on a court or other tribunal when they decide on later cases with the same questions or facts.  

Respect for precedent is the means through which common-law legal systems achieve their purpose of resolving cases in accordance with consistent, principled norms so that similar facts will result in similar and predictable decisions.

Common-law precedent is a third category of law, standing alongside statutory law (i.e., laws established by legislative bodies) and subordinate legislation, or regulatory law in the UK.  The principle judges are supposed to precedents is known as stare decisis.

According to the common-law tradition, courts read statutes and apply precedent, which outlines how and why earlier judgments were resolved, to determine the law that applies to a case.

To know more about precedent

brainly.com/question/14816803

#SPJ4

Both home repair and auto repair frauds are similar in that they involve unscrupulous individuals or companies taking advantage of the trust and lack of knowledge of the consumer to overcharge or perform shoddy work.

In both cases, the fraudsters often target vulnerable individuals such as the elderly, low-income households, or people who are not familiar with the industry standards.

They may also use high-pressure tactics to convince the consumer to agree to unnecessary or overpriced repairs. Both types of frauds can result in significant financial losses for the victim, as well as safety hazards if the work performed is substandard.

To avoid falling victim to these types of scams, it is important to do thorough research on a company or individual before agreeing to any repairs, and to get multiple quotes for comparison.

To know more about  financial losses  click on the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29602673#

#SPJ11

Out of the provided alternatives, it may be concluded to state that the Part 3 of the Constitution is also regarded as the Magna Carta. Therefore, the option A holds true.

The national constitution of the United States is divided into multiple parts. This division into parts is done with the primary intention of easing the interpretation of the laws. One such parts, i.e., the Part 3 of the American Constitution is named as Magna Carta. This part of the constitution includes the fundamental rights granted to the US citizens.

Learn more about constitution here:

https://brainly.com/question/29799909

#SPJ4

The Illinois state legislature passes a law raising the speed limit on certain state roads. this law becomes part of a body of law known as  Statute law.

A statute is a piece of written law that the president signs after it has been approved by the legislature. Congress passes laws that become part of federal statute law, and the president of the United States signs them. To become a state law, an act must be authorized by the state legislature and signed by the governor.

They are used to regulate the system and compel compliance with the law. Legislation that has been adopted by a governing body of people is known as statutory law. They are created by the government and apply to all laws it passes, not just specific types of laws.

To learn more about Statutory law,

https://brainly.com/question/14612143

#SPJ4

Bribery and reinforcement have some key differences, including when the timing item is given. So, choice B is the right one.

Reducing undesirable behavior can also be accomplished by using reinforcement! However, bribery and reinforcement are NOT the same things. Keep in mind that although bribery is a negotiation that takes place when a hard behavior happens, reinforcement is planned ahead of time.

Bribery is a bargain that takes place as a result of difficult behavior, whereas reinforcement is prearranged. Bribery is different from positive reinforcement in that the latter occurs after the child has displayed proper conduct, whilst the former occurs before.

To learn more about bribery and reinforcement,

https://brainly.com/question/30245405

#SPJ4

Yes, it is completely appropriate to mention that the people in Great Britain tend to drive on the left side of the road, as per their traffic rules and regulations.

The traffic rules in the Great Britain are similar to those followed in countries like India, whereas, they are completely in contrast when it comes to the regulations of the United States. Since a majority of the public  in the Great Britain is right-handed, the traffic rules maintain that driving should be done on the left-side of the road.

Learn more about traffic rules here:

https://brainly.com/question/28879065

#SPJ4

The theory is a broad explanation of a topic with deep analysis and specifications, fact is something that a view or a process is proven correct and accepted by the whole world. Law explains a topic shortly through definition and an equation.

Law is a small definition with a simple equation of a topic in a subject like mathematics and science it’s not an explanation. The laws can change according to new understandings and evolution.

The theory is a rational explanation of an object. Its function evolution and its features. The theory will have a hypothesis of a topic and if any advancement in that topic happens theory will get included. The theory provides facts and shows the unnoticed features present in a particular topic.

A fact is repeatedly observed and proven correct. Facts are considered true until they are proven void and once a process is a proven fact it is acceptable all over the world without any doubt.

To know more about theory

brainly.com/question/14543764

#SPJ4

Serious penalties, such as paralegal license suspension or revocation, fines, job loss, or, when there is criminal behavior, referral to the proper authorities, may be the outcome of legal ethics violations by paralegals.

Ethics in the legal field describes how people choose to engage with one another. In philosophy, ethics outlines the nature of the obligations that people have to themselves because one another as well as what is beneficial to each person and society.

Lawyers and other court officials frequently have to choose between their personal interests and those of the people they represent. Legal ethics are crucial in assisting the practitioner in balancing these interests and working to advance good faith.

To know more about legal ethics visit :

https://brainly.com/question/28791848

#SPJ1

Answer: Thurgood Marshall

Explanation: By 1929, Howard University had developed into a full-time law school under his encouragement and was the training ground for about a quarter of the nation's black law students. Houston's pupils at Howard University included Thurgood Marshall, the nation's first African American U.S. Supreme Court Justice. Hope this helps!

Information taken directly from an existing classified source and stated verbatim in a new or different document is an example of information extraction.

Classified information is often collected by governments for various reasons. It can be used to monitor terrorist activities, develop new weapons, or even spy on foreign governments. It is also important for the government to keep certain information private, such as diplomatic negotiations and trade agreements. In addition, classified information can be used to help inform decision-making and protect citizens from harm.

Businesses also use classified information to protect their interests. Companies use classified information to protect their trade secrets and proprietary technology. This helps them stay ahead of their competitors and maintain a competitive edge. For example, a company may have access to classified information that could allow them to develop a new product before their competitors, giving them a huge advantage in the market.

Learn more about stated verbatim at : https://brainly.com/question/30142714

#SPJ4

Information taken directly from an existing classified source and stated verbatim in a new or different document is an example of ______

Thomas Jefferson added the following phrase to the first clause of the Declaration of Independence: "When in the Course of Human Events.

Men establish governments in order to protect these rights, and those governments are legitimate because the people they are supposed to govern have consented to them. People have the right to change or abolish any type of government and institute a new one if it begins to act contrary to their goals.

However, when a long history of wrongdoings and usurpations that constantly strive to attain the same goal betray a desire to reduce them under utter despotism, it is their right and responsibility to topple such government and to establish new guards to secure their continuous protection. These Colonies have endured such painful sorrow.

Learn more about Declaration Visit: brainly.com/question/472238

#SPJ4

The US is the supreme court case that established the idea of judicial review.

This theory was established by the court in Marbury v. Madison (1803). The Court had to determine which was the highest law of the land in this case: a Congress Act or the Constitution.

In Marbury v. Madison (1803), the Fourth Chief Judge of the United States John Marshall (1801–35) argued that the Supreme Court of America States had the authority to declare unconstitutional legislation passed by Congress. This is generally regarded as the beginning of the constitutional judicial review.

The notion of "judicial review" was created by Marbury v. Madison, which gives the supreme court the authority to declare acts of parliament unlawful. No component of the Constitutional, including the Fundamental Rights, was outside the scope of the Parliament's ability to change it, the SC said, but the "fundamental framework".

Learn more about the judicial review here:

https://brainly.com/question/966716

#SPJ4

The maximum fine for a first non-driving alcohol-related offense of possession or consumption of alcohol by a minor can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific laws in place.

In general, the fine for a first offense is usually considered a relatively minor one and may be less than for repeat offenses.

In the United States, for example, the maximum fine for a first offense of possession or consumption of alcohol by a minor is typically around $500, although it can be higher or lower depending on the state and the specific circumstances of the case.

Some states also include community service or alcohol education classes as part of the penalty for a minor in possession or consumption charge.

To learn more about alcohol

https://brainly.com/question/4698220

#SPJ4

Due to the U.S. war on drugs, millions of people have been criminalized, imprisoned, or have had their access to necessary resources and supports for leading healthy lives disrupted or completely removed.

It gives a general overview of the main state institutions and describes how they interact (for example, between the executive, legislature and judiciary). A constitution encapsulates the fundamental principles of a government. Once our constitution has been ratified, only the sovereign power has the capacity to change it. All laws, executive decisions, and judicial decisions must adhere to the constitution, which established the authority held by the various government organs.

It decides how people and governments will communicate. The nation's citizens are all protected, and their basic rights are granted. It explains how the government will be chosen as well as who will be in charge of making important decisions. to define the persons in a society who are in charge of making decisions; to provide a set of fundamental rules that permit the bare minimum of social structure. It establishes the makeup of the government. to set limits on the demands that a government can make on its citizens.

To know more Constitution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29799909

#SPJ1

Answer:

the death penalty

Explanation:

id take the death penalty away because taking one life because they took a life is no better because in the end 2 lifes are gone and only one person free to walk away and the toll on their mind i could only imagine.

Answer:

reinforcement is planned ahead whereas bribery is a negotiation during the occurrence of a challenging behavior

Hope this helps . . . was your question complete?

The US is the supreme court case that established the idea of judicial review.

This theory was established by the court in Marbury v. Madison (1803). The Court had to determine which was the highest law of the land in this case: a Congress Act or the Constitution.

In Marbury v. Madison (1803), the Fourth Chief Judge of the United States John Marshall (1801–35) argued that the Supreme Court of America States had the authority to declare unconstitutional legislation passed by Congress. This is generally regarded as the beginning of the constitutional judicial review.

The notion of "judicial review" was created by Marbury v. Madison, which gives the supreme court the authority to declare acts of parliament unlawful. No component of the Constitutional, including the Fundamental Rights, was outside the scope of the Parliament's ability to change it, the SC said, but the "fundamental framework".

Learn more about the judicial review here:

brainly.com/question/966716

#SPJ4

Federalism law is provided by the Tenth Amendment of the constitution. The American version of "federalism," the system by which the legal powers of governance are divided between the federal government based in Washington, D.C.

It is defined by the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which is frequently overlooked.

The relationship between the federal and state governments is defined by the 10th Amendment, which also contributes to this definition. The challenge of balancing state and federal interests as they relate to the federal government's authority to tax, police, and regulate matters like wage and hour laws.

The release of personal information in record keeping systems, and laws pertaining to strip mining has gotten worse as federal activity has increased.

To know more Amendments like this

brainly.com/question/13276862

#SPJ4

Answer: The Congress shall have Power . . . To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; . . . While the Supreme Court . . .

Answer: the smith act

Explanation: