Warm-Up
Type your response in the box.

This exercise will help you comprehend the widespread impact that trade has on an economy. Look around the room you are in, and list five different objects you see. List what the item is, where it was made, and why you think it was made there.






12pt


Warm-Up
Type your response in the box.

This exercise will help you comprehend the widespread impact that trade has on an economy. Look around the room you are in, and list five different objects you see. List what the item is, where it was made, and why you think it was made there.






12pt






This exercise will help you comprehend the widespread impact that trade has on an economy. Look around the room you are in, and list five different objects you see. List what the item is, where it was made, and why you think it was made there.

The two main sources of  of Constantinople's economic well-being was largely due to

The Byzantine empire was know to accommodate a lot of trade. Its capital Constantinople was a major trade hub for agricultural produce.

  Constantinople was a prime hub in a trading network that at various times extended across nearly all of Eurasia and North Africa.

Another important factor was the taxation system. The country side paid more taxes than the cities, therefore people were forced to move to the city for trade.

The Byzantine Empire, which is also known as the Eastern Roman Empire or Byzantium, was the extension of the Roman Empire in its eastern provinces.

This empire existed during the during Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, when its capital city was Constantinople.

Learn more about the Byzantine Empire at https://brainly.com/question/1446842

#SPJ1

Scholasticism is the medieval process in Western Europe, as the rise of the guilds would be most directly connected Hence,

It frequently drew on writings from antiquity and placed equal emphasis on rational argumentation and Christian theology. Scholasticism was a rational and acceptable method of learning, but it was also dogmatic and strictly adhered to one set of rules. Greek skholastikos, which meaning "a scholar," is where the word "scholasticism" originates.

Scholasticism refers to the philosophical frameworks and speculative tendencies of different medieval Christian scholars who strove to reconsider general philosophical concerns despite working in opposition to unchangeable religious dogma.

Scholastic philosophy dominated institutions between 1100 and 1500. The Scholastics valued empiricism and believed that rationality, logic, and academic inquiry could buttress Roman Catholic beliefs.

Thus, option C is correct.

For more information about Scholasticism, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/11009328

#SPJ2

The characteristic of a federal state is that governmental power is shared.

In a Federal state, the power of government is shared among the tiers of the government which includes state and local government.

The above means that each region would have control and power over to independently regulate themselves.

Learn more about federal states here: https://brainly.com/question/21185733

#SPJ1

Answer:

NO

Explanation:

Based on the details, Giblin’s attitude toward Thomas Young is positive because Young shows the skills and determination to figure out the inscriptions.

We can define attitude as the way an author feels about something or someone as he writes about them. Here, we must read the excerpt by Giblin to determine his attitude about Thomas Young.

Let's list what Giblins says about Young in the excerpt:

With the information above in mind, we can conclude that Giblin's attitude toward Young is positive. He lists the skills Young has and mentions his determination to handle the inscriptions. Option A is the correct answer.

Learn more about attitude here:

https://brainly.com/question/10231627

#SPJ1

Answer: its A

Explanation: i did the flvs test

Answer:the answer is C

Explanation: took the FLVS module 07 exam and got a 100

The U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War was purely motivated by a desire to prevent the spread of communism and not just to promote democracy.

The foreign policy of the United States during the Cold War was the protection of its international interests against the Soviet Union's communism.

The United States' foreign policy then focused on:

From the above points, we understand that the U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War was not motivated by a desire to promote democracy.

But another factor that motivated the country's foreign policy and international relationships was the containment of the threats posed by communism and socialism from the Soviet Union.

Thus, the U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War was purely motivated by a desire to prevent the spread of communism and not just to promote democracy.

Learn more about the U.S. foreign policy during the Cold War at brainly.com/answer expert verified

#SPJ1

Answer:

The judicial branch

Explanation:

The judicial branch is a branch of the federal government that makes sure that laws are constitutional.

The first semester guide on economics gives information about all that will course would be offering from the beginning till the end of the semester

These informations includes:

Economics can be defined as a social science which studies wants in relation to scarce means that has alternative uses

So therefore, the first semester guide on economics gives information about all that will course would be offering from the beginning till the end of the semester

Learn more about economics:

https://brainly.com/question/17996535

#SPJ1

Answer:

D

Explanation:

A is true, there was a lot of argument within the coalition forces.

B, many countries oppose imperialism

C is true, but it doesn't fit the context, the Kuwait is oil-rich so countries would want to liberate it to retain their oil supply

D, peacekeeping forces were not used in the gulf war.

Answer:

He wanted to thank Americans for treating him as a hero.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!!!

if you can its so important for you to say after the second term George Washington gave up power for the sake of democracy which in those days didnt really happen. revolutionaries and kings didnt give up power. but washington did for the sake of the system : democracy

its very super important that he did that

he took a huge risk fighting without everyones support

he started a war with england not knowing if everyone was on board with american independence. there were a lot of people who thought being with england was better...so he took a huge risk fighting without everyones support

what makes america & washington different from european democracy and revolutions is that american has political freedom and CULTURAL & ECONOMIC freedom. europeans felt the people could NOT be trusted to make the right decisions. in europe revolutions sometimes meant no religion or only a few allowed. Washington & founders said ALL religions are ok. Washington felt the people could be trusted. in europe it meant in economics : communism or socialism with heavy state or monarchical intervention. but america has had capitalism which is a form of freedom. to business without the kings permission and without the permission of the state. Boston tea party is an example

point of the second amendment and of the founding fathers like washington was to NOT have a standing army because it was thought of as a risk of being undemocratic. it was thought to make those in power might possibly use a standing army to stay in power illegally. to not have an army was a very new and unusual step for a country to take. in the case of war a draft would be used to create an army and after a war was done the army was supposed to be disbanded. this was not done anywhere else and the idea was revolutionary.

many european democracies have CHANGED their constitutions more than once. America has not changed it since the 1700's

washington and other founders made a special provision in the consitution for a freedom of the press

Under the Constitution of the United States of America, political rights protect the freedoms of: C. every American citizen.

A Constitution is a set of formally written laws and principles which typically determines the power and authority of a democratic government or parliamentary government, as well as guarantee the fundamental rights and freedom of her citizens.

In this context, we can infer and logically deduce that political rights protect the freedoms of every American citizen under the Constitution of the United States of America.

Read more on Constitution here: brainly.com/question/19129329

#SPJ1

For the Federalists, their most likely response is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

The Federalists were American Founding Fathers who wanted a strong government and strong executive branch.

The Federalists were opposed by the anti-Federalists who wanted a weaker central government.

The Federalists did not vote for a bill of rights because they regarded the constitution as sufficient, unlike the anti-Federalists who demanded a bill of rights to be part of the Constitution.

Thus, for the Federalists, their most likely response is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists at https://brainly.com/question/267094

#SPJ1

Option D. The way that the federalists would respond to this would be They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

This was the name that was used to refer to the people that were in support of the United States having a central government.

They wanted a federal government that would be in the helm of affairs of the states and all of the citizens.

Read the excerpt from the Publius.

In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.

—Publius

How would Federalists most likely respond to this?

They would agree but doubt the Constitution could make that happen.

They would doubt that any central government could meet these goals.

They would argue that the government does not need to control itself.

They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

Read more on the federalists here: https://brainly.com/question/412270

#SPJ1

Answer:

It would be an oracle since they were warriors as they were in tier 3 and fulfilled the role of a healer and bard however in my career I never came across that IF Druids are associated with Bards.

Explanation:

If I am wrong I am sorry.

The idea behind the communist theory is that all persons born are not born to a particular social class, hence, option A is the correct answer.

communism is a political practice is in which the ownership of properties by an individual is to be replaced by communal ownership, in this sense, all properties especially the ones that are most valuable and businesses that are lucrative belong to the community.

In conclusion, communism is a classless social system with one form of public ownership of the means of production.

Learn more about communism here:

https://brainly.com/question/891214

#SPJ1

Answer:

All class divisions

Explanation:

Other person is correct

Answer:

I would focus on how one of the empires lasted for nearly 2 millennia (if you count Byzantium as Rome), and how the other fell apart very soon after the empire’s namesake “Alexander” perished.

Explanation:

Well, democracy is a Greek-born concept.

So, When and why did democracy happen in ancient Greece?

To Give vs To Receive

There are several variations of democracy as it is used in various nations today. Democracy now has as many influences as there are varieties of bananas available on the market thanks to historical events and thinkers. But whenever academics discuss the beginnings of democracy, they always go back to the same location. They reflect on this amazing civilization known as Ancient Greece.

If you imagine democracy to be a legacy of one great philosopher among ancient Greeks, you are dead wrong. In fact famous philosophers like Aristotle and Plato had many objections to democratic governments. For Aristotle, ordinary people such as carpenters, soldiers, farmers, had too many things to do in a day, they cannot be expected to cultivate "virtues". Virtue, in the eyes of Aristotle, is the domain for the elite class. A sector of society with sufficient wealth and leisure time for whom to devote time and effort to cultivate virtue without material gain comes naturally. For Aristotle, states should be governed by such people. I wouldn't be surprised if the etymology of "Aristocrat" has to do with Aristotle.

Neither did Plato say anything better. In fact, monarchies, dictators, and despots would find in Plato their inspiration. Plato saw a government governed at the top by a philosopher-king to be the best. Just as a healthy and just body is governed by knowledge and reason, a healthy and just society is one governed by a "lover of knowledge", hence the philosopher-king.

Democracy was not an invention of a great mind. It was invented by lesser minds. It was invented by people with a "war-like" character, invented by Greek warriors. People who were bellicose and cocky. A class of people who were eager to win material gain by pillaging other towns. In ancient times, to make war with other states with the aim of material gain was how states pursued economic development. From this breed of people came a battle formation which is admired up to this day: the phalanx.

In a phalanx, the Greeks arrayed themselves in close rectangular formation. Because the terrain of Greece is rugged, one particular size became effective often. It was 20 x 15, twenty men across, 15 men deep. Do the math and you will see 20 x 15 = 300.

Given that an individual warrior had the minimum battle skills, the success of the Phalanx depended on its cohesion. It had to march and maneuver as a group. Its success depended on coordination. Attack as one, retreat as one when needed. It had to stay together no matter what. I hope, my friends, you can imagine how unnerving it might have been for untested warriors to man the front line of a Phalanx. But true to their character, with grit and valor they manned their places in the formation.

My friends, I hope you are still with me on this page because I haven't said yet how the Phalanx gave rise to democracy.

When the Greek warriors, coming from battles, marched back to their states they divided the loot among themselves. If they won against an invading army, each recounted his deeds in the battlefield in front of his comrades in a gathering possibly organized at night, around bonfires. But when it came to issues of state policies, each demanded a voice in government. Because, each contributed to the success of the Phalanx, it was only fitting that the voice of each be heard. The Greeks agreed, and so it was sealed.

"Awuuu, awuuu, awuuuuuu", they said.

Phalanx gave rise to Democracy. It was put together by a class of men who from the standpoint of philosophers were lesser minds. But because ancient Greek warriors gave so much for the Phalanx to succeed, their voices were heard in government. They gave, and a lot they did.

Democracy was born in Athens between 700 BC and 500 BC..

My dear friends, let us look at our democracy now. Today the only righteous mind to keep in modern society, it seems, is the one that listens to the people. To listen to that sector of society we call the masses.

During the infancy of democracy, ancient Greek warriors gave a lot to their city-states which in turn won them a voice in government. But today, moral philosophy compels us to do differently. In modern democracy, moral philosophy compels governments to listen to the voice of the masses. But listen closely and you will hear it distinctly. Give us!

Where as, the ethical system of ancient Greek warriors compelled them to give in order to be heard, the ethical system of modern democracy compels the state to listen to those whose only longing is to receive. To give to the masses whose voice is one. Give us!

The best change described in the passage is -

Japan’s emperor was with wielded only ceremonial power from the end of World War II until today.

constitutional monarchy-  A constitutional monarchy is a type of government in which the real power is vested in the executive selected by the people while the monarch is the only titular head of the government. All the functions of the government are done in the name of the monarchy, but the power to make decisions is in the hand of the legislature which is chosen by the people.

After world war two defeat, the monarchy of japan was disempowered and installed as a ceremonial head.

The other famous example of a constitutional monarchy is the Kingdom of Great Britain.

To learn more about the types of government please click on the link https://brainly.com/question/18464634

#SPJ1

Dry deserts and high mountains are the main geographical obstacles for china.

Dry deserts to the north and west, the Pacific Ocean to the east, and insurmountable mountains to the south separated the vast territory from the rest of the globe. This allowed the Chinese to evolve independently of the rest of the world's civilizations.

The Himalaya Mountains are located to the south and southeast of China. These are the world's tallest mountains. They formed an almost impenetrable boundary for Ancient China, isolating the region from many other civilizations. They were very significant in Chinese religion and were revered.

The Gobi Desert and the Taklamakan Desert were two of the world's biggest deserts to the north and west of Ancient China. These deserts also served as barriers between China and the rest of the globe. The Mongols, on the other hand, dwelt in the Gobi Desert and were continually attacking northern Chinese towns. This is why the Chinese erected the Great Wall of China to defend them against northern invaders.

Therefore, the answer is dry deserts and high mountains.

To know more about china click here:

https://brainly.com/question/11915231

#SPJ1

Answer:

C) to show how the Church of England ought to be.

Explanation:

For the rest of the globe, the city on a Hill served as a role model. God would punish them if they didn't do what they were supposed to do. The letter declares, "Eyes of all people are upon us," implying that "City on a Hill" could be considered a utopia.

Learn more about "City on a Hill" at https://brainly.com/question/1766764

#SPJ1

Nations competed for more land, colonies and raw materials. Great Britain and Germany competed industrially, which led to these nations needing more raw materials. Also, Austria-Hungary controlling the Slavic land of Bosnia, which Serbia believed belonged to them.

The information is to write about the newspaper headline of your choice and this is illustrated below.

High taxes on groceries

On February 20th, a young man that was named John Kings was on his way to the grocery. He needed to pick some things on his way before going home.

He picked some gingerbread and went to check out. The gingerbread was $5 but the total price was $8. He was unaware ans had only $5 with him. The unfair taxes are wrong.

Learn more about newspaper headline on:

brainly.com/question/18077891

#SPJ1

I think the US shouldn't have gone to war with Mexico in 1800. First, I believe that an independent country shouldn't have its lands conquered by other countries.

Secondly, I consider that although civilizations have historically been marked by wars, these are never favorable and generate violence and the deaths of innocent people.

It was a series of conflicts that took place between the United States and Mexico in the period from 1846 to 1848. It began with the American ideals of territorial expansion in lands belonging to Mexico.

The conflict ended with the defeat of Mexican troops by the Americans, leading to the conquest of Texas, which after a period of independence, became part of the American domain.

Therefore, wars and conflicts between countries due to territorial expansion can lead to negative consequences for the lives of civilians, in addition to weakening economic relations between the countries involved.

Find out more about American-Mexican war here:

https://brainly.com/question/12609518

#SPJ1