Executive Order 9066 was an executive order issued by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942, which authorized the Secretary of War to prescribe certain areas as military zones.
This order was used to create exclusion zones, which allowed the United States government to forcibly relocate more than 120,000 people of Japanese descent to internment camps during World War II. The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066 in Korematsu v. United States (1944).
In its ruling, the Supreme Court held that the evacuation order was constitutional, noting that the need to protect against espionage outweighed individual rights, which could be infringed upon in times of war. The Court held that the evacuation order was a reasonable and logical response to the threat of espionage, particularly given the fact that Japanese Americans were viewed as a threat to national security. The Court also noted that the exclusion order was based on race, but argued that the government had a legitimate reason for doing so, given the circumstances of the war.
Learn more about Executive Order 9066 at : https://brainly.com/question/30185886
#SPJ4
Which part of the Constitution is called the Magna Carta Mcq?
Part 3
Part 4
Part 2
Part 5
Out of the provided alternatives, it may be concluded to state that the Part 3 of the Constitution is also regarded as the Magna Carta. Therefore, the option A holds true.
The national constitution of the United States is divided into multiple parts. This division into parts is done with the primary intention of easing the interpretation of the laws. One such parts, i.e., the Part 3 of the American Constitution is named as Magna Carta. This part of the constitution includes the fundamental rights granted to the US citizens.
Learn more about constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ4
u.s. supreme court case that established the idea of judicial review
The US is the supreme court case that established the idea of judicial review.
This theory was established by the court in Marbury v. Madison (1803). The Court had to determine which was the highest law of the land in this case: a Congress Act or the Constitution.
In Marbury v. Madison (1803), the Fourth Chief Judge of the United States John Marshall (1801–35) argued that the Supreme Court of America States had the authority to declare unconstitutional legislation passed by Congress. This is generally regarded as the beginning of the constitutional judicial review.
The notion of "judicial review" was created by Marbury v. Madison, which gives the supreme court the authority to declare acts of parliament unlawful. No component of the Constitutional, including the Fundamental Rights, was outside the scope of the Parliament's ability to change it, the SC said, but the "fundamental framework".
Learn more about the judicial review here:
https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
______a set of laws in the south that enforced racial segregation
what act made it illegal to plan any act which could depose the government?
Answer: the smith act
Explanation:
does great britain drive on the left side of the road?
Yes, it is completely appropriate to mention that the people in Great Britain tend to drive on the left side of the road, as per their traffic rules and regulations.
The traffic rules in the Great Britain are similar to those followed in countries like India, whereas, they are completely in contrast when it comes to the regulations of the United States. Since a majority of the public in the Great Britain is right-handed, the traffic rules maintain that driving should be done on the left-side of the road.
Learn more about traffic rules here:
https://brainly.com/question/28879065
#SPJ4
a precedent is a decision that furnishes an example or authority for deciding subsequent cases involving similar legal principles or facts. (T/F)
A precedent provides a source of example for the ongoing cases which the Supreme Court will refer for any ideas. It is a legal principle that has been established in a prior case and is either persuasive or binding on a court or other tribunal when they decide on later cases with the same questions or facts.
Respect for precedent is the means through which common-law legal systems achieve their purpose of resolving cases in accordance with consistent, principled norms so that similar facts will result in similar and predictable decisions.
Common-law precedent is a third category of law, standing alongside statutory law (i.e., laws established by legislative bodies) and subordinate legislation, or regulatory law in the UK. The principle judges are supposed to precedents is known as stare decisis.
According to the common-law tradition, courts read statutes and apply precedent, which outlines how and why earlier judgments were resolved, to determine the law that applies to a case.
To know more about precedent
brainly.com/question/14816803
#SPJ4
one main difference between bribery and reinforcement is the
Answer:
reinforcement is planned ahead whereas bribery is a negotiation during the occurrence of a challenging behavior
Hope this helps . . . was your question complete?
Should prosecution for a crime in both state and federal courts be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause?
the maximum fine for a first non-driving alcohol-related offense of possession or consumption of
The maximum fine for a first non-driving alcohol-related offense of possession or consumption of alcohol by a minor can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific laws in place.
In general, the fine for a first offense is usually considered a relatively minor one and may be less than for repeat offenses.
In the United States, for example, the maximum fine for a first offense of possession or consumption of alcohol by a minor is typically around $500, although it can be higher or lower depending on the state and the specific circumstances of the case.
Some states also include community service or alcohol education classes as part of the penalty for a minor in possession or consumption charge.
To learn more about alcohol
https://brainly.com/question/4698220
#SPJ4
what legal rule is violated if a paralegal hears a client state they have hidden documentation that woudl have a negative impact on their case
Serious penalties, such as paralegal license suspension or revocation, fines, job loss, or, when there is criminal behavior, referral to the proper authorities, may be the outcome of legal ethics violations by paralegals.
What does ethics mean in legal terms?Ethics in the legal field describes how people choose to engage with one another. In philosophy, ethics outlines the nature of the obligations that people have to themselves because one another as well as what is beneficial to each person and society.
Why is legal ethics crucial?Lawyers and other court officials frequently have to choose between their personal interests and those of the people they represent. Legal ethics are crucial in assisting the practitioner in balancing these interests and working to advance good faith.
To know more about legal ethics visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28791848
#SPJ1
information taken directly from an existing classified source
Information taken directly from an existing classified source and stated verbatim in a new or different document is an example of information extraction.
Classified information is often collected by governments for various reasons. It can be used to monitor terrorist activities, develop new weapons, or even spy on foreign governments. It is also important for the government to keep certain information private, such as diplomatic negotiations and trade agreements. In addition, classified information can be used to help inform decision-making and protect citizens from harm.
Businesses also use classified information to protect their interests. Companies use classified information to protect their trade secrets and proprietary technology. This helps them stay ahead of their competitors and maintain a competitive edge. For example, a company may have access to classified information that could allow them to develop a new product before their competitors, giving them a huge advantage in the market.
Learn more about stated verbatim at : https://brainly.com/question/30142714
#SPJ4
Information taken directly from an existing classified source and stated verbatim in a new or different document is an example of ______
what agency should be notified of any environmental violations
Any environmental infractions should be reported to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC).
The Comprehensive Environmental Pollution Index must be severely enforced and taken into consideration, according to a directive from the National Green Tribunal (NGT).
The EPA's goal is to safeguard both the environment and human health. EPA strives to guarantee that:
American citizens enjoy clean air, water, and land;National initiatives to lessen environmental dangers are supported by the most up-to-date scientific data;Federal laws safeguarding the environment and human health are applied and enforced in a fair, efficient, and way that Congress intended;To know more about EPA, refer to this link:
https://brainly.com/question/29644646
#SPJ4
what is the law of freedom of religion, speech, press, petition, and assembly
Which one of the following is a feature of natural rights?
which original supreme court justice studied law with hamilton?
Answer: Thurgood Marshall
Explanation: By 1929, Howard University had developed into a full-time law school under his encouragement and was the training ground for about a quarter of the nation's black law students. Houston's pupils at Howard University included Thurgood Marshall, the nation's first African American U.S. Supreme Court Justice. Hope this helps!
What source of law is provided by the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution?
Federalism law is provided by the Tenth Amendment of the constitution. The American version of "federalism," the system by which the legal powers of governance are divided between the federal government based in Washington, D.C.
It is defined by the 10th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which is frequently overlooked.
The relationship between the federal and state governments is defined by the 10th Amendment, which also contributes to this definition. The challenge of balancing state and federal interests as they relate to the federal government's authority to tax, police, and regulate matters like wage and hour laws.
The release of personal information in record keeping systems, and laws pertaining to strip mining has gotten worse as federal activity has increased.
To know more Amendments like this
brainly.com/question/13276862
#SPJ4
possession of an open container of alcohol receives a jail confinement of
A six-day jail sentence is imposed for having an open bottle of alcohol.
How do Americans refer to prison?Prison and jail are frequently used as synonyms for places of incarceration. If you wish to be more precise, jail may be used to describe a location for people who are being held while their case is being processed or are being held for less serious offences, whereas prison can be used to represent a location for those who have been guilty of serious crimes.
Why are prisons used?With very few exceptions, modern jails are municipal or county-level detention centers run by local police departments or correctional facilities. Like their historical forebears, they are employed to hold those who pose a flight risk or a threat to public safety while they await trial.
To know more about Jail sentence visit:
brainly.com/question/29996207
#SPJ1
How many votes did each state have under the Articles of Confederation group of answer choices?
What is the law of independent assortment? Mendel's law of independent assortment states that the alleles of two (or more) different genes get sorted into gametes independently of one another.
Article i, section 8, clause 3 of the united states constitution __________.
Answer: The Congress shall have Power . . . To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; . . . While the Supreme Court . . .
national law enforcement appreciation day january 9 2023
National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day (LEAD) is an annual event to recognize, honor, and thank the brave men and women of law enforcement for their service and dedication to our country.
On January 9th, 2023, we should take time to remember the selfless sacrifice of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice in the line of duty, while also recognizing the hard work, dedication, and courage of those who continue to serve and protect our communities every single day.
The day is a chance to thank these brave men and women for their commitment to keeping our communities safe and to show our appreciation for the difficult and often dangerous work they do every day.
Show your support for law enforcement by displaying a blue light in your front window, wearing blue in honor of the men and women in blue, or simply saying “thank you” to those officers you may come in contact with. Let’s use National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day to show our support and appreciation for the officers who put their lives on the line every day to keep our communities safe.
Learn more about communities:
https://brainly.com/question/23790401
#SPJ4
Should the system use shaming as a form of punishment in this modern society? Why or why not?
200 words please
Answer:
Shaming as a form of punishment has been used in societies for centuries, but it is not an effective form of punishment in modern society. Shaming is seen as a form of public humiliation, which can lead to long-term psychological damage. This type of punishment has been proven to be ineffective in deterring criminal behavior and has been known to cause more harm than good. Additionally, it is seen as a form of discrimination, as it disproportionately affects those who are already marginalized in society.
In addition to its ineffectiveness, shaming can also be seen as a form of revenge, rather than justice. It often involves punishing someone for a crime they may have committed, even if they have not been convicted in a court of law. This can lead to a lack of due process in the criminal justice system and can cause people to be unfairly targeted.
Ultimately, shaming as a form of punishment is not an effective way to deal with criminal behavior in modern society. It has been proven to be ineffective, can lead to long-term psychological damage, and can lead to a lack of due process in the criminal justice system. It is important to consider alternative forms of punishment, such as rehabilitation and education, that can be more effective in deterring criminal behavior.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes but not to harsh, shaming lets people know who they are and what theyve done.
Sorry for not using 200 words
Explanation:
how are home repair frauds and automobile repair frauds similar to one another?
Both home repair and auto repair frauds are similar in that they involve unscrupulous individuals or companies taking advantage of the trust and lack of knowledge of the consumer to overcharge or perform shoddy work.
In both cases, the fraudsters often target vulnerable individuals such as the elderly, low-income households, or people who are not familiar with the industry standards.
They may also use high-pressure tactics to convince the consumer to agree to unnecessary or overpriced repairs. Both types of frauds can result in significant financial losses for the victim, as well as safety hazards if the work performed is substandard.
To avoid falling victim to these types of scams, it is important to do thorough research on a company or individual before agreeing to any repairs, and to get multiple quotes for comparison.
To know more about financial losses click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29602673#
#SPJ11
The illinois state legislature passes a law raising the speed limit on certain state roads. this law becomes part of a body of law known as?
There is only one explanation for why economists give conflicting advice on policy issues, and it is that they have different scientific judgments about the validity of alternative theories. Policies such as rent control and trade barriers persist because almost all economists agree that those policies are desirable.
established judicial review which gave supreme court power to declare laws unconstitutional
Established judicial review Marbury v. Madison gave the supreme court power to declare laws unconstitutional.
Chief Justice John Marshall's ruling in Marbury v. Madison established the judicial review principle, a crucial component of the "checks and balances" system designed to prevent any one arm of the national govt from becoming overly strong.
The most well-known Supreme Court authority, judicial review—or the power to find a legislative or executive action to be in violation of the Constitution—is not contained in the Constitution's text. This theory was established by the court in Marbury v. Madison (1803).
The concept of judicial review—the ability of federal courts to rule that legislative and executive actions are unconstitutional—was established by the U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803). The unanimous judgment.
Learn more about Marbury v. Madison here:
https://brainly.com/question/11982017
#SPJ4
One main difference between bribery and reinforcement is the a) items provided b) timing of the item provided c) effectiveness of both d) results of both.
Bribery and reinforcement have some key differences, including when the timing item is given. So, choice B is the right one.
Reducing undesirable behavior can also be accomplished by using reinforcement! However, bribery and reinforcement are NOT the same things. Keep in mind that although bribery is a negotiation that takes place when a hard behavior happens, reinforcement is planned ahead of time.
Bribery is a bargain that takes place as a result of difficult behavior, whereas reinforcement is prearranged. Bribery is different from positive reinforcement in that the latter occurs after the child has displayed proper conduct, whilst the former occurs before.
To learn more about bribery and reinforcement,
https://brainly.com/question/30245405
#SPJ4
What does the Declaration of Independence say about right to revolution?ght to overthrow the government
Thomas Jefferson added the following phrase to the first clause of the Declaration of Independence: "When in the Course of Human Events.
Men establish governments in order to protect these rights, and those governments are legitimate because the people they are supposed to govern have consented to them. People have the right to change or abolish any type of government and institute a new one if it begins to act contrary to their goals.
However, when a long history of wrongdoings and usurpations that constantly strive to attain the same goal betray a desire to reduce them under utter despotism, it is their right and responsibility to topple such government and to establish new guards to secure their continuous protection. These Colonies have endured such painful sorrow.
Learn more about Declaration Visit: brainly.com/question/472238
#SPJ4
the illinois state legislature passes a law raising the speed limit on certain state roads. this law becomes part of a body of law known as ____
The Illinois state legislature passes a law raising the speed limit on certain state roads. this law becomes part of a body of law known as Statute law.
A statute is a piece of written law that the president signs after it has been approved by the legislature. Congress passes laws that become part of federal statute law, and the president of the United States signs them. To become a state law, an act must be authorized by the state legislature and signed by the governor.
They are used to regulate the system and compel compliance with the law. Legislation that has been adopted by a governing body of people is known as statutory law. They are created by the government and apply to all laws it passes, not just specific types of laws.
To learn more about Statutory law,
https://brainly.com/question/14612143
#SPJ4
why did the writers of the bill of rights feel it was important to include the right to keep and bear arms?