Answer:
C. The federal government worked with state and local governments
Explanation:
The education policy was modified in the 20th and 21st century with the federal government working more closely with the state and local governments to regulate their teaching methods and make sure that the standard of education became better and more inclusive. There was the inclusion of Standardized Testing which made all universities to use a particular standard to teach.
Answer:
C. The federal government worked with state and local governments
to improve schools.
According to John F. Galliher, legal definitions of criminality are arrived at through a __________ process.
Answer: guilty vedect
The role of the United States Marshals was based on the role of _____. A. the town crier B. early colonial watches C. the sheriff D. police officers
Answer:
C the sheriff
Explanation:
Are these statements true or false? Give your opinions and explain the reason why:
1. Offers to enter into commercial contracts terminate when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
2. When the offeree replies that a part of the offer is accepted, the offeree shall be deemed to have made a new offer.
3. Remedy of fines and remedy of damages shall be applied concurrently
4. Time when written contracts are entered into is at the time when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
5. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of damages shall not be applied
6. The parties agreed that the fine level accounts for 8% of the contract value. This agreement is contrary to the provisions of law
7. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of fines shall be applied
8. Every contract for purchase and sale between traders and traders is commercial contract.
9. The subjects of commercial contract for purchase and sale are the signers of contract
10. The aggrieved party shall bear the burden of proof of loss when requesting the breaching party to pay for damages.
Answer:
k
c
Explanccation:
A typical Crop-Hail policy will likely cover ALL the following perils, EXCEPT:
A. lightning
B. failure to harvest.
C. fire.
D. transit to storage after harvest.
Answer:
fire
Explanation:
hope this may help you have a nice day.A typical Crop-Hail policy will likely cover ALL the following perils, except fire.
What are crops?A plant that may be widely cultivated and harvested for food or profit is considered to be a crop. A crop is what is produced when many plants of the same sort are grown in one location. Most plants are grown in hydroponic systems or through agriculture. Macroscopic fungi (like mushrooms) and marine macroalga (like seaweed) are examples of crops, some of which are raised in aquaculture.
Crop-hail insurance is a type of insurance that covers loss and destruction brought on by both fire and hail. It is a product that farmers buy to safeguard agricultural goods while they are still in the field and unharvested.
Therefore, Thus option(C) is correct.
Learn more about crops here:
https://brainly.com/question/801194
#SPJ2
A person may legally ride in the back of a pickup truck when: The sides of the pickup bed are at least 24 inches high. The back of the pickup is covered with a camper shell. In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
Answer:
C. In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
Explanation:
Pick up trucks are manufactured for the purpose of transporting goods or other equipment but not for the transportation of humans. While riding at the back of a pickup truck can seem enticing, if appropriate measures are not considered, then there would likely be an accident for the driver might take a sharp turn which could cause the passengers behind harm.
One of the laws for riding in the back of a pickup truck is possessing a federally-approved restraint system which protects the rider in the bed of the truck. So, the rider should seat in a secured seat with an approved safety seat belt to keep him protected in the event of a crash.
Legally speaking, a person can only ride in the back of a pickup truck when In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
When can a person ride in a pickup?The back of a pickup truck is open and can lead to someone falling off if they aren't careful.
For this reason, the law demands that the back should have a secured seat which has a seatbelt that is approved by the relevant authority. If this isn't the case then no one should sit in the back.
Find out more on driving regulations at https://brainly.com/question/11291892.
Casey Martin was a golfer on the PGA Tour who, due to an illness, needed a golf cart to move around the course. After being denied permission to use a cart, Martin sued the PGA. Many of the players on the tour objected to the suggestion that Martin should be allowed to use a cart. Which of the following objections to Martin’s being allowed to use the cart is an expression of teleological reasoning?a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.” c) “The PGA is a private organization. The courts should not tell a private organization what to do.” d) (a) and (b). e) (a), (b), and (c).
Answer:
d) (a) and (b).
Explanation:
Teleology is any philosophical account of the purpose of a thing
Teological reasoning has to do with finding a reason to explain the phenomena in relation to purpose they serve instead of their causes.
From the scenario given, Martin was refused permission to use a cart to play golf due to an illness and the objections to Martin's use of the cart are a0 a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.”
Answer: A
Explanation:
Importance of censorship in the media
Answer:
it's important because it helps to filter out the nudity, real life violence and
the use of profanity.
Explanation:
in simple ways .. we can see the truth of government .. we may find out the reason and secrets ..
Importance of censorship in the media is for ethical, political, or security concerns, it represses writing or speaking. Social media censorship has the potential to provide a false perception of society.
What do you mean by the censorship?When some people are successful in imposing their own political or moral ideals on others, censorship—the suppression of "offensive" words, images, or ideas—occurs.
Many would contend that social media censorship is necessary because it might curb online hostility to an unhealthy degree.
Although there may be some merit to this, if harsh and unpleasant speech is permitted to be muted, who knows what else will be banned in the future?
Social media censorship has the potential to provide a false perception of society.
Therefore, importance of censorship in the media is for ethical, political, or security concerns, it represses writing or speaking. Social media censorship has the potential to provide a false perception of society.
To know more about the censorship, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1762718
#SPJ2
Section 35-4-20 of the Michie's Alabama Code, published by LexisNexis in 1991.
Answer:
thats just crazy
Explanation:
Abel was employed as a security guard for Seep Corporation. Abel's job was to guard a fenced-in area and to use force to keep intruders from climbing the fence to enter the plant. His working hours were from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. At about 11:00 P.M. one evening, Abel drove past his place of employment. He saw a teenager named Johnny climbing the outside of the fence that he guarded during the day. Angered by this violation of Seep's property rights and by the fact that Johnny had called him a "potbellied moron" only three days earlier, Abel stopped his car, ran up to the fence, pulled Johnny off of it, and beat him up. Johnny sues Seep Corporation for Abel's assault and battery (both intentional torts). Which of the following is most likely to be the court's verdict? Group of answer choices
Answer:
B. Seep's is not liable because Abel didn't act within the scope of his employment.
Explanation:
According to the facts, Abel is a rightful employee of Seep Corporation. And he also has a duty to preserve the interest of his employer.
But at the same time, his act of beating up and assaulting Johnny was done outside of the jurisdiction of his working hours. And as such, he wasn't covered in the company's rule of using "force to keep intruders from climbing the fence to enter the plant". Moreover, the personal attack that Johnny had done on him makes this assault personal. So, Abel's attack on Johnny has nothing to do with the company he works for, and the Corporation is not liable for any charges or damages that their employee had done outside of his 'employment' hours.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
Select the correct answer.
Who can propose an amendment to the Constitution?
A a simple majority of Congress
B. the president
с.
the Supreme Court
D.
a two-thirds majority of Congress
Answer:
d
Explanation:
a two-thirds majority of Congress
"A legal owner of property has the right to use that property in any way they want to, and the power to give those rights to another. This is called"
Answer:
Property Interest
Explanation:
"A legal owner of property has the right to use that property in any way they want to, and the power to give those rights to another. This is called Property Interest.
What is property interest?The right to own or utilize property is referred to as a legal interest in that property. It belongs to the registered owner, or the person listed on the title deeds at the Land Registry.
The owner has the power to govern the property due to their legal interest, which allows them to determine whether to sell or transfer it.
The rights that people have in their property are referred to as ownership interests. Property interest is a broad topic that includes ownership duration, ownership proportion, transfer rights, encumbrance rights, & rights of survivorship.
To learn more about Property interest
https://brainly.com/question/14330082
#SPJ5
Now write a CV with Cover Letter to the Head of the Department of Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation for the post advertised.
To, The Head of Finance
Dear Sir,
I have recently seen your advertisement regarding the vacant post in the finance department of your organization. I am CFA and has recently started pursuing MBA finance to enhance my skills and professional knowledge.
I have more than 3 years of experience in the field of finance and have achieved employee star award for my exceptional performance.
I have enclosed my CV for your reference.
CV Sample
Huma Saeed +471 26 555 257
Professional experience :
Bank al Hamra 2016 - 2018
Michael page 2018 - present
Qualification:
Bachelors 2014
CFA 2015-2017
MBA 2017 - Present
Learn more at https://brainly.com/question/24374352
When the Constitution entitles all citizens to “due process” of law, what does this phrase mean?
It is C) Every citizen has the right to a trial
Answer:
D: all of the above
Explanation:
Drivingschool4me course answers and permit answers ?
QUESTION 18
Indicate the correct statement:
(1) An ex parte application is the motion application used when there is no dispute of facts
(2) Action proceedings is another type of motion application and the procedure is started by a
notice of motion
(3) In criminal cases a procedure is started with action proceedings
(4) The parties in a criminal case are the prosecutor and the defendant
Answer:
2 or 4 is correct
Explanation:
step by step explanation
The correct statement in the given question is (4) statement.
Statement (1) - Ex Parte Application
Ex parte application is used in civil procedure and is used to refer to motions for orders that can be granted without waiting for the response from the other side.
These orders are only in place until further hearing can be held such as temporary restraining order .
Under U.S.A law , court are hesitant to make ex parte motion because according to 5th amendment and 14th amendment, there is a guarantee of right to due process and ex parte leads to the violation of excluded party's right to due process.
Statement (2)- Action Proceedings
Action Proceedings refers to a judicial proceedings where a party brings a civil or criminal case against another party, an action has been brought against the other party.
It is not a type of motion application and is used in cases such as:
- presence of material disputes in facts
- it is instituted by summons
- evidence to be relied upon in supporting the claim and is not disclosed in the statement
- exchange of pleadings are involved
-evidence in the form of testimonies and documentary is given to prove the claims
- more expensive and time consuming
Statement (3)- Arrest
In criminal cases a procedure is started with Arrest.
An arrest is made with an arrest warrant and may be made with or without warrant if probable cause and exigent circumstances are presented at the time of Arrest.
The right to make warrantless arrests are commonly defined and limited by statutes subject to due process guaranteed by U.S.A Constitution.
Statement (4)- Prosecutor and Defendant
These both terms are related strictly to Criminal Law.
Prosecutor- Legal representative of the prosecution in the states with the criminal law system. The prosecution is the legal party responsible for presenting the case in a criminal trial against an individual accused of breaking the law.
A lawyer who initiates prosecution of criminal offences and present s the case for prosecution in a criminal proceedings
Defendant- Defendant is a person who is the party either accused of committing a crime or criminal prosecution
Thus the parties in criminal case are the prosecutor and the defendant.
To learn more about Prosecution and Defendant here
https://brainly.com/question/11980088
#SPJ3
Why the criminal justice system continues to fail taxepayers?
The criminal justice system in the United States serves the purpose of upholding the rule of law and ensuring the safety of citizens. It works under the notion that the country operates under certain rules, and that breaking those rules results in a punishment. However, the system is flawed and there are several reasons why it continues to fail the taxpayers who fund it.
One problem of the criminal justice system is that it relies on processes that are flawed by their very nature, such as human memories, fingerprints, DNA evidence and eyewitnesses. This can result in wrong convictions of innocent people.
Another problem of the system is that many people who work in it possess biases. Judges, lawyers, and the police can be biased towards certain races, gender, age groups or other groups of people. This makes it difficult for justice to be administered fairly to all people.
Finally, another problem of the criminal justice system is that over time, sentences have become longer, more serious, and more common. However, these sentences do not always deter crime, and often get in the way of the rehabilitation of past convicts. This defeats the purpose of the system and makes it difficult to ensure the safety of the population.
Define, describe, compare, and contrast common-law crimes and statutory crimes. Be sure to provide examples.
Answer:
Common law is commonly defined as jurisprudence and it is of 2 types – one in which the decisions made are existing legislation in which there are no legislation and another where the court may require the current law and establish new definitions and divisions.
The legislative regulations can be enacted by the various departments of a country. Therefore, there's many laws enacted by state and federal governments, laws enacted by cities and municipalities, all of which have the force of law.
Adia filed a case against Chang in the court at Ohio. However, Chang had never visited Ohio and had no personal ties with anyone in Ohio. Chang could successfully argue that the court:________
a. was in proximity to the place where Chang resides.
b. lacked personal jurisdiction.
c. was limited by subject matter jurisdiction.
d. did not have judges that would understand the languagespoken by him.
Answer:
b. lacked personal jurisdiction
Explanation:
A court is said to lack personal jurisdiction when the offense or activity doesn’t take place in the location of the court or when the court isn’t situated in the state of origin of the defendant.
Ada filing the case against Chang at a court in Ohio which isn’t Chang’s state of origin and in which he has not visited before means that the court at Ohio lacks personal jurisdiction to progress with the case.
- The American Medical Association classifies alcohol as:
Answer:a disenfectant?
Explanation:alcohol disenfects wounds
1. Which of the following does law enforcement NOT do to enforce the law?
A. Apprehend and detain individuals who violate laws
B. Discover law violations
C. Determine how the law applies to a situation
D. Deter law violations
Answer:
C. Determine how the law applies to a situation
Explanation:
Which government body authorized CTSOs? Through the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act, the has authorized CTSOs.
CTSO's also called as Carl D Perkins Vocational and Technical Educational Act was authorized by Federal Government i.e. The Congress in 1984.
What is CTSO?CTSO is a principal source of federal funding to states and discretionary grants for the improvement of secondary and post secondary career and technical education program across the nation.
The purpose of the act is to develop fully the academic, career and technical skills of secondary and post secondary students who elect to enroll in career and technical education program.
The act also aims to increase the quality of technical education within the United States in order to help the economy.
History:
The Smith-Hughes Act of 1917 was the first authorization for the federal funding of vocational education. Subsequent legislation for vocational education included the Vocational Act of 1973 and the Carl D Perkins Act of 1984.
Later different forms of act like Perkins II in 1990, Perkins III in 1998 and Perkins IV in 2006 were introduced.
In 2018 President Trump signed into law for the re authorization of the Act in 2018 under the name of Perkins V passed unanimously by the Congress.
The Perkins IV included three major areas of revision:
- Use of career and technical education instead of vocational education
- Maintaining the Tech Prep program as a separate federal funding stream within the legislation
- Maintaining state administrative funding at 5% of a state's allocation.
What is Federal Government?Federalism is a mixed or compound mode of government that combines a general government with regional governments in a single political system, dividing the powers between the two.
The political principles that animate federal systems emphasize the primacy of bargaining and negotiated coordination among several power centers. They stress the virtues of dispersed power centers as a means for safeguarding individual and local liberties
To learn more about CTSO here
https://brainly.com/question/8903174
#SPJ3
Khẳng định: “Mọi chủ nợ của doanh nghiệp , Hợp tác xã đều có quyền nộp đơn yêu cầu tuyên bố doanh nghiệp phá sản khi nhận thấy doanh nghiệp rơi vào mất khả năng thanh toán” là đúng hay sai? Vì sao?
Answer:đúng tại vì phá sản
Explanation:
Once you identified a potential conflict of interest,which question should you ask yourself next?
Have the relevant third parties provided their consent? Do threats to compliance impair your independence? Are threats to compliance with the code at an acceptable level?
According to John F. Galliher, legal definitions of criminality are arrived at through a __________ process.
A self-fulfilling prophecy occurs when a youth receives negative feedback from significant others, the youth interprets this feedback as accurate, and his or her behavior conforms to this negative expectation.
a. True
b. False
Qualifications for Jury Service
• Never have been convicted of a felony
• Not be currently on active duty in the military
• Not be already serving on another jury
• Be able to read and write in English
. ?
Which other qualification must a citizen meet before he or she can serve on a
jury?
A. Be at least 18 years old
B. Have completed military service
C. Not be enrolled in college
There are several qualifications for a citizen to be able to serve in a jury and one of them is that they should A. Be at least 18 years old.
What are the requirements to serve on a jury?Only people who are aged 18 and above can serve in a jury because they are considered to be more mentally mature.
The person also has to be able to read and write in English and should have a clean record.
#SPJ5
Find out more on jury duty at https://brainly.com/question/5137364.
A. Be at least 18 years old
what can be broken but never held?
Answer:
Promise ,I guess that's the correct answer
Answer:
A promise
Explanation:
or even a law lol
Which of the following best explains how the need for eldercare impacts
estate planning?
A. Eldercare costs only impact estate planning and estate taxes
for individuals with assets of over $5 million.
B. If eldercare is needed, the individual's estate becomes the
property of the organization providing the care.
C. The high cost can have a significant impact on an estate's
assets and how those assets will eventually be distributed to
beneficiaries
D. Because eldercare is provided by government programs
without any cost to the individual receiving care, it does not
impact estate planning,
Answer:
A. Eldercare costs only impact estate planning and estate taxes
for individuals with assets of over $5 million.
Answer:
C. The high cost can have a significant impact on an estate's
assets and how those assets will eventually be distributed to
beneficiaries
Explanation:
I got it wrong.
2 practical ways that could ensure that employers abide by the labour laws in our country
Answer:
Giving rewards to employers who abide by the labour laws, and punishing those who don't.
Are there limits to the right to cure? Does a breaching party have the right to cure the breach, or can the non-breaching party proceed directly to a damage claim?
Answer:
The overview of the particular question becomes demonstrated in the following portion on the clarification.
Explanation:
There seem to be limitations to something like the obligation to heal. Here rational duration seems to be the limit. An infringing party shall have the opportunity to remedy the infringement regardless of any non-confirmation given the period to fix or rectify the infringement having not terminated unless the infringing community notifies the non-infringing party of its determination to remedy the infringement and therefore remedies the infringement throughout the defined timeframe limits.Furthermore, if there would be an infringement resulting from non-conformance but perhaps the infringing party believes that there would be no infringement and the solution would be appropriate also if the infringing party seasonally shall notify the non-infringing party that perhaps the infringing party seems to have a reasonable amount of time to remedy the infringement.Therefore one thing becomes significant, the role including its defaulting party isn't constrained to healing by verifying requirements if it is suggested that fitting for the intent of healing is also part of the contract, therefore the party must ensure that healing suits the intention as well.