What was the most life changing event for Tally in her journey? How did it change her?

Answer:

to decrease bias

Explanation:

The experimental procedure stated in the question is a blinded placebo test. This procedure seeks to reduce the bias in the experiment due to the "placebo effect."

The placebo effect is the effect whereby patients treated with a placebo (a dummy treatment) claim to be responding better to treatment methods.

Answer:

To decrease bias. Took test and its correct.  

Answer:

Assimilationists is the encouragement by some americans.

Hope this helps...

Explanation:

Answer:

persuasive

Explanation:

A persuasive writing structure states the opinion of the writer while also attempting to influence readers into accepting the views of the writer.

For example, typical persuasive writing may use a five-paragraph format. Thus, the structure would often be formal this way:

Answer:

wanted to prove the existence of God

was interested in the chain of the divine

If those are answer choices

Explanation:

Answer:

c. intensity

Explanation:

In this exercise, you have to select the correct option that answers which aspect of decorum Norm's violates.

In this case, the correct answer is c "intensity" because Norm talked about his boss' good qualities, which is okay, but he spoke too much, exaggerating the qualities and making his boss embarrassed, so he ended up not behaving propriety.

Answer:

Summary

Madison begins perhaps the most famous of the Federalist papers by stating that one of the strongest arguments in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. Madison defines factions as groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions. Although these factions are at odds with each other, they frequently work against the public interest, and infringe upon the rights of others.

Both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions. The state governments have not succeeded in solving this problem; in fact, the situation is so problematic that people are disillusioned with all politicians and blame government for their problems. Consequently, a form of popular government that can deal successfully with this problem has a great deal to recommend it.

Given the nature of man, factions are inevitable. As long as men hold different opinions, have different amounts of wealth, and own different amount of property, they will continue to fraternize with people who are most similar to them. Both serious and trivial reasons account for the formation of factions but the most important source of faction is the unequal distribution of property. Men of greater ability and talent tend to possess more property than those of lesser ability, and since the first object of government is to protect and encourage ability, it follows that the rights of property owners must be protected. Property is divided unequally, and, in addition, there are many different kinds of property. and men have different interests depending upon the kind of property they own. For example, the interests of landowners differ from those who own businesses. Government must not only protect the conflicting interests of property owners but must, at the same time, successfully regulate the conflicts between those with and without property.

To Madison, there are only two ways to control a faction: to remove its causes and to control its effects. The first is impossible. There are only two ways to remove the causes of a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests. Destroying liberty is a "cure worse then the disease itself," and the second is impracticable. The causes of factions are thus part of the nature of man and we must deal with their effects and accept their existence. The government created by the Constitution controls the damage caused by such factions.

The framers established a representative form of government, a government in which the many elect the few who govern. Pure or direct democracies (countries in which all the citizens participate directly in making the laws) cannot possibly control factious conflicts. This is because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against the actions of an obnoxious individual or a strong majority. Direct democracies cannot effectively protect personal and property rights and have always been characterized by conflict.

If the new plan of government is adopted, Madison hopes that the men elected to office will be wise and good men,­ the best of America. Theoretically, those who govern should be the least likely to sacrifice the public good to temporary condition, but the opposite might happen. Men who are members of particular factions, or who have prejudices or evil motives might manage, by intrigue or corruption, to win elections and then betray the interests of the people. However, the possibility of this happening in a large country, such as the United States, is greatly reduced. The likelihood that public office will be held by qualified men is greater in large countries because there will be more representatives chosen by a greater number of citizens. This makes it more difficult for the candidates to deceive the people. Representative government is needed in large countries, not to protect the people from the tyranny of the few, but to guard against the rule of the mob.

Answer:

silk

Explanation:

bad tempered or not speaking beacause someone is angry about something

Answer:

The best way to revise the sentence is:

D. To raise money for uniforms, members of the volleyball team will hold a car wash on Saturday.

Explanation:

The original sentence is not really defective, it is only missing a piece of information concerning when the car wash will be held. The best way to add it is to include it at the end of the sentence, as is done in letter D. To raise money for uniforms, members of the volleyball team will hold a car wash on Saturday.

Let's take a look at the other options to understand why they are not usable.

Letter A does begin with the subject of the sentence, but interrupts it with extra information, preventing the sentence from being a direct one. It sounds really confusing. Letter B adds the "on Saturday" information at a strange place, also interrupting the direct flow of the sentence. Letter C puts the "on Saturday" information right at the beginning. It's not that this can't be done. But, in this case, a comma should be added after it. Nevertheless, it makes the introduction of the sentence too long, which is not a good thing.

Answer:

The answer is option D = the reddish light that often appears on mountains at sunrise and sunset.

Answer: C

Explanation:

Answer:

I need more information

Answer:

Explanation:

Most likely to the fact it’s new and nobody had really done anything like it before

Answer:

It would have  been bad because firstly the technology was not much developed than today...

Explanation:

The underlined word percolating that is used on page 2 means seeping.

The process of percolating signifies the gradual movement of any liquid substance through a surface that has very small holes or spaces in it.

Some other words like filtering, straining, draining, dripping, etc. are also used in place of the word percolating.

But the most appropriate term that is suitable here is seeping.

Therefore, the underlined word percolating that is used on page 2 means seeping.

To learn more about Percolating, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/1183058

#SPJ2

Answer: The national parks can be protected.

Explanation: Interrogative, being a sentence ending in a question, can easily be refined by adding a period at the end of a slightly rearranged sentence. Hope this helps!

Answer:

the answer is A

Explanation:

it has a very good explanation while also using the words to help the read keep interest

Answer:

It is with a profound sense of humility that I accept the honor you have chosen to bestow upon me. I know: your choice transcends me. This both frightens and pleases me.

It frightens me because I wonder: do I have the right to represent the multitudes who have perished? Do I have the right to accept this great honor on their behalf? … I do not. That would be presumptuous. No one may speak for the dead, no one may interpret their mutilated dreams and visions.

It pleases me because I may say that this honor belongs to all the survivors and their children, and through us, to the Jewish people with whose destiny I have always identified.

I remember: it happened yesterday or eternities ago. A young Jewish boy discovered the kingdom of night. I remember his bewilderment, I remember his anguish. It all happened so fast. The ghetto. The deportation. The sealed cattle car. The fiery altar upon which the history of our people and the future of mankind were meant to be sacrificed.

I remember: he asked his father: “Can this be true?” This is the twentieth century, not the Middle Ages. Who would allow such crimes to be committed? How could the world remain silent?

And now the boy is turning to me: “Tell me,” he asks. “What have you done with my future? What have you done with your life?”

And I tell him that I have tried. That I have tried to keep memory alive, that I have tried to fight those who would forget. Because if we forget, we are guilty, we are accomplices.

And then I explained to him how naive we were, that the world did know and remain silent. And that is why I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes we must interfere. When human lives are endangered, when human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant. Wherever men or women are persecuted because of their race, religion, or political views, that place must – at that moment – become the center of the universe.

Of course, since I am a Jew profoundly rooted in my peoples’ memory and tradition, my first response is to Jewish fears, Jewish needs, Jewish crises. For I belong to a traumatized generation, one that experienced the abandonment and solitude of our people. It would be unnatural for me not to make Jewish priorities my own: Israel, Soviet Jewry, Jews in Arab lands … But there are others as important to me. Apartheid is, in my view, as abhorrent as anti-Semitism. To me, Andrei Sakharov‘s isolation is as much of a disgrace as Josef Biegun’s imprisonment. As is the denial of Solidarity and its leader Lech Walesa‘s right to dissent. And Nelson Mandela‘s interminable imprisonment.

There is so much injustice and suffering crying out for our attention: victims of hunger, of racism, and political persecution, writers and poets, prisoners in so many lands governed by the Left and by the Right. Human rights are being violated on every continent. More people are oppressed than free. And then, too, there are the Palestinians to whose plight I am sensitive but whose methods I deplore. Violence and terrorism are not the answer. Something must be done about their suffering, and soon. I trust Israel, for I have faith in the Jewish people. Let Israel be given a chance, let hatred and danger be removed from her horizons, and there will be peace in and around the Holy Land.

Yes, I have faith. Faith in God and even in His creation. Without it no action would be possible. And action is the only remedy to indifference: the most insidious danger of all. Isn’t this the meaning of Alfred Nobel’s legacy? Wasn’t his fear of war a shield against war?

There is much to be done, there is much that can be done. One person – a Raoul Wallenberg, an Albert Schweitzer, one person of integrity, can make a difference, a difference of life and death. As long as one dissident is in prison, our freedom will not be true. As long as one child is hungry, our lives will be filled with anguish and shame. What all these victims need above all is to know that they are not alone; that we are not forgetting them, that when their voices are stifled we shall lend them ours, that while their freedom depends on ours, the quality of our freedom depends on theirs.

Answer:

The piece of textual evidence that best supports the inference that Anthony Trudel's parents encouraged his love for golf is:

"As long as he paid attention in school...He could play as much as he wanted."

Explanation:

In the article "Rickie Fowler, Make-A-Wish and the walk of a lifetime at Detroit Golf Club," written by Shawn Windsor on June 30, 2019, the story of Anthony Trudel's love for golf was profusely narrated.  And Shawn described the efforts made by Rickie Fowler to make a difference in the life of Anthony Trudel, a teenager who has brain cancer and loves Rickie Fowler and his golfing talents, especially his respect for others in the field of play.

Answer:

The answer is :

"As long as he paid attention in school... He could play as much as he wanted."

Explanation:

I took the quiz.

If you are in K12 then this answer is correct.

Answer:

Active sentence

Explanation:

An active sentence or voice is a type of sentence where the subject of the sentence is the performer of the action such as the example that was given The kicker missed the point after the touchdown.

However, this can be converted to a passive sentence like this The point was missed by the kicker after the touchdown.

Explanation:

The following are important aspects of all body paragraphs:

Answer:

topic sentance -

supporting detail -

examples -

unity & cohesion -

transitioning between sentances -

concluding sentances -

Answer:

Answer is B

Explanation:

Because it is hard to understand whether 212 feet above the water is about the vehicles or about the bridge.

Answer:

Answer is D.)  with an example that shows a specific brutal living condition

Explanation:

I took the test/quiz already and got this answer correct :)

The author supports the main idea in this paragraph with an example that shows a specific brutal living condition.

The main idea of this excerpt is the fact that the Grimm Brothers had a strong belief (that the most natural and pure forms of culture were linguistic and based on history) and in following it, they saved the fairy tale.

Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm became famous as Brothers Grimm for their contribution to traditional folk tales. They had diversified interests in the world of academia as they worked as cultural researchers, linguists, lexicographers, folklore collectors, and writers.

Learn more about Grimm Brothers here: brainly.com/question/11213664

#SPJ2

Answer:

Negative behaviors led administrators to introduce a dress code to promote a more disciplined environment.

gurkee the turkey

Explanation: problem first then solution, just got it right on e2020..

Answer:

C on Edge

Explanation:

Explanation:

Fast And Furious 1 was released on 18 June 2001.

Hope it helps.

Answer:

A. A dangling modifier

Explanation:

The grammatical error found in the above sentence is "a dangling modifier"

A dangling modifier is a word or phrase which modifies a word without stating it clearly.

In the above sentence, the modifier didn't clearly state what happened to the "hiker".

So, that keeps the reader "hanging" or "dangling".

Answer:

Explanation:

aghhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhdrfg

Explanation:

Summary Plot Overview

On a series of vignettes, The House on Mango Street covers a year in the life of Esperanza, a Chicana (Mexican-American girl), who is about twelve years old when the novel begins. During the year, she moves with her family into a house on Mango Street. The house is a huge improvement from the family’s previous apartment, and it is the first home her parents actually own. However, the house is not what Esperanza has dreamed of, because it is run-down and small. The house is in the center of a crowded Latino neighborhood in Chicago, a city where many of the poor areas are racially segregated. Esperanza does not have any privacy, and she resolves that she will someday leave Mango Street and have a house all her own.

Esperanza matures significantly during the year, both sexually and emotionally. The novel charts her life as she makes friends, grows hips, develops her first crush, endures sexual assault, and begins to write as a way of expressing herself and as a way to escape the neighborhood. The novel also includes the stories of many of Esperanza’s neighbors, giving a full picture of the neighborhood and showing the many possible paths Esperanza may follow in the future.

After moving to the house, Esperanza quickly befriends Lucy and Rachel, two Chicana girls who live across the street. Lucy, Rachel, Esperanza, and Esperanza’s little sister, Nenny, have many adventures in the small space of their neighborhood. They buy a bike, learn exciting stories about boys from a young woman named Marin, explore a junk shop, and have intimate conversations while playing Double Dutch (jumping rope). The girls are on the brink of puberty and sometimes find themselves sexually vulnerable, such as when they walk around their neighborhood in high-heeled shoes or when Esperanza is kissed by an older man at her first job. During the first half of the year, the girls are content to live and play in their child’s world. At school, Esperanza feels ashamed about her family’s poverty and her difficult-to-pronounce name. She secretly writes poems that she shares only with older women she trusts.

Over the summer, Esperanza slips into puberty. She suddenly likes it when boys watch her dance, and she enjoys dreaming about them. Esperanza’s newfound sexual maturity, combined with the death of two of her family members, her grandfather and her Aunt Lupe, bring her closer to the world of adults. She begins to closely watch the women in her neighborhood. This second half of The House on Mango Street presents a string of stories about older women in the neighborhood, all of whom are even more stuck in their situations and, quite literally, in their houses, than Esperanza is. Meanwhile, during the beginning of the following school year, Esperanza befriends Sally, a girl her age who is more sexually mature than Lucy or Rachel. Sally, meanwhile, has her own agenda. She uses boys and men as an escape route from her abusive father. Esperanza is not completely comfortable with Sally’s sexual experience, and their friendship results in a crisis when Sally leaves Esperanza alone, and a group of boys sexually assaults Esperanza in her absence.

Esperanza’s traumatic experiences as Sally’s friend, in conjunction with her detailed observations of the older women in her neighborhood, cement her desire to escape Mango Street and to have her own house. When Esperanza finds herself emotionally ready to leave her neighborhood, however, she discovers that she will never fully be able to leave Mango Street behind, and that after she leaves she’ll have to return to help the women she has left. At the end of the year, Esperanza remains on Mango Street, but she has matured extensively. She has a stronger desire to leave and understands that writing will help her put distance between herself and her situation. Though for now writing helps her escape only emotionally, in the future it may help her to escape physically as well.

Answer: a

Explanation:

To teach readers about George Washington’s stealth and ingenuity.

Answer:

A

Explanation: