Which prediction can most likely be made based on this scenario

Answer:

French and Indian War

laws or Acts

Explanation:

Answer:

The Renaissance changed the way that humans saw themselves.

In the previous period, the Middle Ages, philosophy was theocentric: God was at the center of everything.

In the Renaissance, it was different. Philosophy and art became anthropocentric: humans at the center.

This change naturally created new ideas about human capabilities: humans were seen as more capable than before.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I think Hariot's account of the Algonquins had the following effect on his English readers.

First of all, English people could be informed about the people English colonists encountered on his trip to North America. English people had no idea of what could be there in those far away regions, not even thinking if humans inhabited those lands.

So the description of Hariot portrayed was of primitive indigenous civilizations that basically spend all their interactions with mother nature. He described how Native Indians wear dresses made of animal skins such as deers. He described these Native Indians had a simple life where men hunt animals and collect fruits to feed their families. He also said that they did not have weapons made of iron, as the English had. Instead, they had weapons made of wood and rocks.

Answer:

Human groups became larger as they acquired new sources of foods. These new sources of foods allowed them to be able to support larger populations.

From hunter-gatherers, they became pastoralists, and from pastoralists, human gruops became farmers, when they learned how to practice agriculture.

Agriculture produced food surpluses, which led to the development of even larger human groups, and finally, civilizations.

Answer:

Japan and Italy were members of the Axis powers.

Answer:

D) Villagers continued following traditional clan leaders who made all the decisions.

Explanation:

In the villages, there is a small group of elder people who takes decision and solves disputes among the people of society. These leaders are very respectable in the villages and everyone give respect to them and obey their orders. These leaders of the village have their own rules and regulation and no one can disobey their decision. These leaders made all the decisions of that village.

Answer:correct is D

Explanation:

Sub to my channel! Go to tt and look up ....zuli and click on the yt sign and it will lead you straight to my yt click that sub button

Answer:

1. Saratoga

2. New York

3. England

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you did not include the effects chart. However, we can help with these general comments.

The consequences of the Civil War can be referred into the following categories: political, economic, and social.

In the political arena, after the Union's victory in the Battle of Gettysburg, President Abraham Lincoln saw that the Union had a clear advantage to win the war. On january 1863, he had addressed the nation with the Emancipation Speech to free slaves. After the war, once the Union defeated the Confederacy, the federal government grew in power and influence in the United States. In economics, the southern states felt way behind the Union states. The North was an industrialized region where factories and industries produced many goods. On the other hand, in the South, farming was the primary economic engine. Let's remember that the southerners relied too much on slavery to grow the kind of crops that they exported to Europe.

In the social aspect, after the war, Lincoln ordered a period for Reconstruction in the south. However, he gave leeway to southern states to do Reconstruction at their own pace. This infuriated radical Republicans in Congress.

Answer:1 and 4

Explanation:

People who boycotted disagreed with the amendment because it would have allowed the state to legally discriminate against people who identified as LGBTQ and  Boycotters wanted to send the state of Colorado a strong and quick messageand its impact on LGBTQ citizens.

In Colorado, lesbians, gays, and transgender  people have the same rights as non-LGBT people. Since 1972, Colorado has allowed same-gender conduct.

Civil unions, which provide some of the rights and benefits of marriage, were approved in 2013, and same-gender marriage has been recognized since October 2014.

Thus, option A and D are correct.

For more details about conflict in Colorado, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/10316904

#SPJ2

Answer:true

Explanation: originates from India and was originally written in Sanskrit

Answer:

True

Explanation:

comes from the nation India and was written in Sanskrit

Answer:

C. careful cultivation

Answer:

C

Explanation:

I hope that helps I try

Answer:

The United States of America was established to be an individualistic society where each person is provided with equal opportunities and responsibility for their success.

Explanation:

Individualism is the belief that each person the right to do what he or she believes in. It stresses that individuals have moral significance and they should follow their own values. American Founders critically examined this notion, when creating the Declaration and the Constitution, as they set out to acknowledge and protect every individual's right to life. Most Americans are largely insensitive to the classifications of social status. These values stressed on equal opportunities rather than societal expectations. That means that every individual has an equal opportunity to attain his or her prosperity.

Answer:

Christianity and Judaism

Explanation:

Christianity and Judaism Differences:

Christianity and Judaism Similarities:

The three-Firth’s compromise was like the great compromise because It gave states the power to determine their own populations.

therefor option A is correct.

The great compromise otherwise referred to as the Connecticut compromise  was an agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation each state would have under the United States Constitution.

The Three-fifths Compromise was an agreement over the counting of slaves in order to determine a state's total population which was reached during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention.

The basic relationship between the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifth Compromise was that The Great Compromise settled matters of representation in the federal government. The Three-Fifths Compromise settled matters of representation when it came to the enslaved population of southern states and the importation of enslaved Africans.

Learn more about the Great Compromise at https://brainly.com/question/5172111

#SPJ1

Answer:

Europeans wanted steel because they invented the steel rails, steel locomotives and steel ships

Answer:

Due to their movement.

Explanation:

Airports and newspapers both are the examples of movement because on the airports, the aeroplane flew and transport people from one place to another while the newspaper company distribute the newspaper from the factory where it is produced to all houses and offices where it is needed. So in both cases, there is movement present so we can say that both are the examples of movement.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although you did not include the chart to identify the kinds of Information, we do some research to know further references and can comment on the following.

The benefits provided by each type of primary source historical evidence are the following.

Political Cartoons. Cartoonists have always played an important role in sharing the news with a touch of humor. They have served to have an alternative way to understand facts. That is why every major newspaper includes political cartoons.

Letters and diaries. It is a great primary resource because the information is shared by people who witnessed the event or lived or was part of a determined historical event. This information is so valid.

Photographs. It is said that one image speaks tons compare with a thousand words. And that is true. A photograph is a graphic description of a moment in time. It can transmit what words can't. That is why photographs really convey feelings, emotions, and moments.

Maps. Geography influences how people live and act. Territories have changed trough human history due to factors such as war, conquest, or legislation. Maps are very important to know and understand where people live, territorial disputes, nature catastrophes, battle scenes, and more.

Advertisements. It can show how people did business in a determined period of history. How they conveyed marketing or sale ideas to different societies, revealing important cultural aspects of the time.

I think it's B but im not 100% sure

Answer: It is A    

Explanation

but give congrats to the first awnser.

Answer:

Archaeological evidence is not clear on this point.

Explanation:

Australia and New Zealand are countries discovered in the years 1770 and 1642 respectively. They are not a part of the continent Australia but a close island called Oceania.

The migration of the early people to the country and the path they took are not clearly stated as there are no archaeological records of it.

Answer: Shay's Rebellion showed the weakness of the Articles of Confederation. When the central government couldn't put down the Rebellion the first stirrings of federalism began to gather strength

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

During the French and Indian War, most American Indian groups allied with the French.

Answer:

PLATO word by word

Explanation:

Dear Citizens of the People’s Republic of China,

I recently read a news article about the Great Cannon, which is your government’s new program to censor the Internet. It’s designed to attack and disrupt websites that the government wants to block you from accessing.

The article quoted Internet security experts saying that the Chinese government can use the Great Cannon to spy on any Internet user accessing Chinese websites, including websites hosted on servers outside of China. The article said the State Internet Information Office will continue to increase its censorship of the Internet to crack down on activists fighting for personal freedom for Chinese citizens.

The Chinese government maintains that it has the right to block Internet content that it views as a threat to national security. It claims it’s acting to protect its citizens from “dangerous” information. The US government, however, can’t make a similar argument, either to its citizens or to other nations. All US citizens are protected from invasion of their privacy by the first of 10 amendments to the US Constitution. These amendments are known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights guarantees citizens the right to demand a warrant for police searches of their homes. Under the Bill of Rights, American citizens’ personal liberties are safe.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Explain why early European explorers and rulers might have decided to take the dangerous journey across the Atlantic to claim land and colonize North America.

In a time of European superpowers during the Middle Age, European monarchies wanted to acquire more land and territories to strengthen their power and dominion. That is why the Kings supported explorations and navigations expeditions to find more or better routes to Africa and the Indies. Portugal had a great navy for the time. Spanish also had a good navy and hired the best navigators to lead the expeditions.

For instance, that was the case of Christopher Columbus, who received the sponsorship of Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabelle del Castille -King and Queen of Spain- to explorer a shorter route to the Indies. That is how he arrived in the Americas on October 12, 1492.

Answer:

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.