Answer:
The answer is A just took the quiz
Explanation:
Under the Articles of Confederation, the national government could not enforce laws because There was no national court system.
The Articles of Confederation made the national government quite weak by for instance:
Denying it the power to tax Denying it the power to create a national court systemAs a result of the federal government being unable to create a national court system, they could not try people who violated laws as only the states could and their laws were not universal.
In conclusion, the federal government could not really enforce laws as it lacked the national court system to prosecute people in.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/16379544.
It is our social responsibility to ensure respect for human rights
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
It's is our social responsibility to ensure respect for human rights because as a citizen, respect for human rights is on of our obligations. we are meant to respect each other and by doing that, we respect our human rights.
Answer
Yessss
Explanation:
After several robberies in a city, the government deploys a number of police personnel and provides helpline numbers to the residents of the city. This is done because recent research conducted by a team of criminologists showed that the increase of security in crime-prone areas helps in the reduction of crime. This conversion of research into practice is known as ________. A: Evidence Based Criminology B: Translational criminology C: Knowledge-based criminology D:Experimental criminology
How can principles of Ubuntu be applied to criminal justice system to ensure justice to victims ?
Answer:
It would encourage fair and right practice in resolving criminal cases.Explanation:
The principles of Ubuntu emphasize on the practice of moral goodness and believes in the essence of fairness and social justice. It also encourages compassion, love, tolerance, and other humane values.Applying these values in the criminal justice system would encourage fair and right practice in resolving criminal cases. As we know there have been numerous cases of unfair practice and punishment in the criminal justice system, the need to apply the principles of Ubuntu becomes very important.It would ensure justice to victims as well as incorporate right punishments to the offenders.Attorney Sarah Robinson represents a woman named Taylor Jackson as a plaintiff in a car accident case. The defense has made an offer to settle the case, but Sarah leaves it on her desk without forwarding a copy to Taylor. Taylor calls six times to check on the status of the case, but all of the calls go unanswered. The settlement offer expires before Taylor ever sees it.
Answer:
Her actions were illegal
Explanation:
We could make the conclusion that the attorney's actions were illegal. Consider, under the requirements of the law, an attorney acts as a representative to clients by giving advice to the clients, etc.
But they do not have the responsibility of making decisions for their clients except they receive the consent of their clients.
In, U.S. Supreme Court ruled that school officials may conduct warrantless searches of individuals at school based on
Answer: see below
Explanation:
New Jersey V. T.L.O. 469 U.S. 325 (1985) the scotus ruled that school officials do need a warrant or probable cause to search a student, they only need responsible suspicion
Who is responsible for writing the transcripts of the proceedings in the courtroom? O bailiff O court reporter O general counsel O law clerk
post full test if you have please
Sam, a cleared DoD employee, receives an e-mail message on his NIPRNET account that contains classified information. Who should he notify first of this incident?
Answer:
He must notify Security Manager.
Explanation:
As the email received by Sam contains confidential content information, he must notify the Security Manager immediately, so that possible flaws in the security system can be investigated quickly and effectively, in addition, Security Manager is the professional capable of analyzing and determine the reason for sending that email, who sent it and what the landlords should do to avoid this type of problem.
What helps notions such as fairness,honesty,and reciprocity to be codified into law?
A) The notions are synonymous with law.
B) The notions differ to some degree in different cultures around the globe.
C) The notions are universal norms.
D) The notions are characteristics inherited by each person irrespective of the culture.
Answer:
C) The notions are universal norms.Explanation:
The codification of laws usually varies among different governments, societies and cultures. Laws are created through various decision making processes and are drawn from different sources such as culture, conventions, ideologies, etc. Therefore, different countries have different laws.
However, every law serves the same purpose i.e., the welfare of the people. In every law, notions such as fairness,honesty,and reciprocity are codified as these notions are universal norms and all laws were codified on the basis of these norms.
what is the difference between reflecting and mirroring in communication
00
DO
YE
You are approaching an intersection on a multiple-lane road, and you want to change lanes;
A: You may change lanes in an intersection if there is a large enough opening in the lane you want
to enter.
B: You must not change lanes when crossing through an intersection.
C: You must not change lanes within 150 feet of an intersection.
You may change lanes in an intersection if there is a large enough opening in the lane you want to enter, as a person is approaching an intersection on a multiple-lane road, and you want to change lanes. Hence, option A is correct.
What is intersection?Any location where two or more roads intersect or meet at grade is referred to as an intersection or crossroad. There are 973 crossroads in Karachi City, according to a source. Roundabouts may or may not be present at intersections, and they may or may not be signalized.
Thus, option A is correct.
For more details about intersection, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13373561
#SPJ2
Black Americans are 75 percent more likely than others to live near facilities that produce hazardous waste. Can the businesses that operate these facilities make a difference?
Answer:
Yes, the businesses that operate these facilities can make a difference.
Explanation:
According to a survey, Black Americans are 75 percent more likely than others to live near facilities that produce hazardous waste. Businesses that operate these can make a difference in ensuring proper waste management and emission to areas far away from residential areas.
The businesses should also employ the use of recycling of these harmful waste materials to a subsequent conversion to harmless substances.
in states that have both district attorneys and county attorneys, the county attorneys are responsible for:
Answer:
they're in charge of the control of prosecutoral functions of jurisdiction
what is the importance of human right?
The concept of human rights empowers people and tells them that they deserve dignity from society, whether it's the government or their work environment. When they don't receive it, they can stand up.
Human rights ensures people have basic needs met, protects vulnerable groups from abuse, allows people to stand up to societal corruption, encourages freedom of speech and expression, gives people the freedom to practice their religion, encourages equal work opportunities, and generally provides a universal standard that holds governments accountable.
In the end of the court case it was decided by the court that Sally was just over-reacting and should not receive any retribution for the stolen boyfriend. She decides she wants a second opinion and therefore appeals. The court is known as: *
Answer:
Appellate Court.Explanation:
The Appellate Court, also known as the Court of Appeals, is a judicial court that hears cases which have been already heard in other courts. The duty of an appellate court is to review the processes and verdicts givens by the trial courts.
Here, since Sally is not satisfied with the judgement made by the trial court, she can apply for a hearing in the Appellate Court. The appellate court would review hear case and make the final decision.
"What did the United States Supreme Court rule in the case of Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971)
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
The question was that could federal courts constitutionally authorized to oversee and produce remedies for state-imposed segregation?
“the Court held that once violations of previous mandates directed at desegregating schools had occurred, the scope of district courts' equitable powers to remedy past wrongs were broad and flexible. The Court ruled that
1) remedial plans were to be judged by their effectiveness, and the use of mathematical ratios or quotas were legitimate "starting points" for solutions;
2) predominantly or exclusively black schools required close scrutiny by courts;
3) non-contiguous attendance zones, as interim corrective measures, were within the courts' remedial powers; and
4) no rigid guidelines could be established concerning busing of students to particular schools.”
So in other words
“The Court held that busing was an appropriate remedy for the problem of racial imbalance in schools, even when the imbalance resulted from the selection of students based on geographic proximity to the school rather than from deliberate assignment based on race. This was done to ensure the schools would be "properly" integrated and that all students would receive equal educational opportunities regardless of their race.”
The doctrine that forever bars the parties in a lawsuit to bring action again for the same claim is called
Answer:
Res judicata
Explanation:
Res judicata is a Latin word which means matter decided. It is a situation in which an apex court has ruled over a case and there is no more room for any appeal or retrial of any form.
The judgement is usually final with both parties having no option than to accept it.
Res judicata is also known as the doctrine that forever bars the parties in a lawsuit to bring action again for the same claim.
I- Describo cómo se da la violencia escolar dirigida: Por los alumnos contra sus pares: __________________________ Por un docente contra los alumnos: _________________________ Los alumnos contra los docentes: ___________________________
La respuesta correcta a esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente. Aunque no existen opciones de respuestas, comentaremos lo siguiente.
Describe cómo se da la violencia escolar dirigida:
1.- Por los alumnos contra sus pares: siendo groseros con ellos. Faltándoles el respeto con caras y modos, contestaciones absurdas y actitudes que muestran su mala gana.
Por un docente contra los alumnos: faltando el respeto a los alumnos con posturas despectivas o comentarios lastimosos. Con actitudes indiferentes y respuestas groseras o cortantes.
Los alumnos contra los docentes: mostrando su indiferencia en clase, ausentándose de clase sin ningún motivo en particular, interrumpiendo las clases de manera intempestiva, contestando de manera agresiva a las preguntas del maestro.
En la escuela debe existir un muto respeto entre maestros, alumnos, autoridades, y padres de familia. Si se rompe este equilibrio, algunas de las partes se verá más afectada que la otra, causando un daño considerable en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje.
How would you explain gender differences in the crime rate ? Why do you think males are more violent than females?
In appellate procedures, each party files a(n) _____ that contains a short description of a case, a factual summary, legal points and authorities, and arguments for reversing or affirming a lower court decision
Answer;
Brief
Explanation:
Appellate courts are usually higher courts in charge of reviewing and retrial of cases which had previously been tried by a lower court.
In appellate procedures, each party files a brief that contains a short description of a case, a factual summary, legal points and authorities, and arguments for reversing or affirming a lower court decision. This is then thoroughly scrutinized by the appellate court in order to arrive at the best verdict possible.