The influence of crime investigation TV series on the public's perception of law enforcement work and courtroom procedures is called the CSI effect.
The exaggerated portrayal of forensic science on crime television programs like CSI: Crime Scene Investigation affects public perception in a number of different ways, including the "CSI effect."
Most frequently, it alludes to the idea that juries have started to demand more forensic evidence in criminal trials, placing the actual burden of proof on the prosecution.
Although this is a widely held opinion among American legal professionals, some researchers contend that while regular CSI viewers may have a diminished regard for circumstantial evidence, crime shows are unlikely to have such an impact.
To learn more about CSI effect visit: https://brainly.com/question/12000529
#SPJ9
a court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except a) the written agreement does not contain the whole agreement. e) the missing term is a condition precedent to the written agreement. c) the missing term is part of a subsequent oral agreement. d) the missing term is part of a collateral agreement. b) the written agreement is unambiguous.
A court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except the written agreement is unambiguous.
Hence , option B is correct
What do you mean by parol?
Parol can be defined as a release of a prisoner on some conditions who has served part of a sentence as well as is under legal custody. It is generally given because of good behaviour. It helps them in reintegrating into society and humanising their life. It is the provisional or temporary release of a prisoner who has to agree to certain Norms like deposit , security before release. The parole rules as described in the Prisons Act, 2000 which are part of both legal and prisons law.
Hence, A court will admit parol evidence about a missing term in relation to any of the following circumstances except the written agreement is unambiguous.
Hence , option B is correct
To know about Parol from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/3520914
#SPJ4
preponderance of the evidence standard of proof applies to the competency to stand trial, just as it does in many types of court cases. in the case of competency to stand trial, the defense must prove that
Preponderance of the evidence standard of proof applies to the competency to stand the trial : the defense must prove that it is more likely than not the accused is incompetent.
What do you mean by Preponderance?
It can be defined as one type of evidentiary standard which is majorly used in a burden of proof analysis. In this the whole process revolves around around to prove that something is most likely than not. It is a very strong and important component in proving cases based on law.
is majorly based upon two factors
burden of productionburden of persuasionHence ,the defense must prove that it is more likely than not the accused is incompetent.
To learn more about Preponderance from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/26765712
#SPJ4
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was intended to meet which major objective?
In reaction to many accounting scandals in the early 2000s, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), a federal law, was enacted in 2002 with backing from both political parties in Congress. Its goals were to enhance auditing and public transparency.
What is Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)?Generally, The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is a federal law that was passed in 2002 with support from both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party in Congress.
In conclusion, Its purpose was to strengthen auditing practices and increase the amount of information that was made available to the public in response to a number of accounting scandals that occurred in the early 2000s.
Read more about Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)
https://brainly.com/question/28484220
#SPJ1
Read the following article by Sykes and Matza on Techniques of Neutralization. Then, respond to the following question:
How do Sykes and Matza’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur? Provide an (anonymous, i.e., do not identify someone by name) example of someone that you know personally or a case that has been well reported in the media where neutralizations are linked to crime or other problem behavior.
Sykes and Matze called these circumstances techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally clean or neutralize their crimes and strain themselves into that they aren't really criminals.
What are techniques?Skill is the ability to carry out a task with discovered results. The knowledge base technique is any systematic way of acquiring information about a scientific nature. Ability to treat such details or use such social movement, and good piano skillfulness.
Sykes and Matze’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur justifications techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally
Therefore, Sykes and Matze called these justifications techniques of neutralization
Learn more about techniques here:
https://brainly.com/question/17130704
#SPJ1
In your own words, describe why it’s critical to always have auto insurance. Provide at least two examples of situations where you might need insurance.
Auto Insurance is always necessary for auto driver as well as his passengers.
Life Insurance, car Insurance, health insurance etc. are needed insurance for everyone .
Auto insurance is very important for drivers and it is madintory for everyone in every states. benefits of auto insurance are
Auto insurance helps passengers :health and personal injury insurance can help pay for medical expenses if you are injured in an accident. It also helps in recovering passenger costs due to accidents. This coverage helps pay for hospital visits, medical expenses, and surgery.
Auto insurance helps protect yourself.Liability insurance is required by law, but many people drive without it. Uninsured Motorist Insurance helps pay for medical bills if you are run over by an uninsured driver. This coverage is mandatory in some states and optional in others.
Adequate auto insurance coverage does more than meet legal requirements. Auto insurance helps protect your car, wallet and even equipment.
personally everyone needed some basic insurance policies which are following:
Life insuranceCar insurancehealth insuranceTo learn more about insurance , refer :
https://brainly.com/question/25855858
#SPJ4
Your privacy is protected by all of the following except
O local government
O state government
O federal government
You are able, thanks to the Privacy Act: know the reasons for collecting your personal information, how it will be used, and who will receive it. have the option of using a pseudonym or not identifying yourself in certain situations. solicit access to your private information, including health data.
What rights are guaranteed by the Privacy Act?Records about individuals retrieved using personal identifiers like a name, social security number, or another identifying number or symbol are protected by the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended to the present and including Statutory Notes (5 U.S.C. 552a).
Is the Constitution right to privacy?Although the Constitution does not provide for the right to privacy, the Supreme Court has stated that a number of the amendments do so.
Learn more Privacy Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/1189272
#SPJ1
The prosecutor kept saying that he has to meet her burden of proof with might be difficult in this case what does that mean
The prosecution has the burden of proof in a criminal trial. The defendant must be proven guilty of the allegations against them by the prosecution to the jury without a shadow of a doubt.
What does prosecution mean?
The decision to pursue a case is made by the magistrate based on the police report that was provided, and the prosecutor is then chosen. The prosecutor is chosen to act as the state's or the government's representative in any criminal case.
Such actions are started by the prosecuting attorney, who could be the federal United States Attorney, the state Attorney General, or the district attorney in question.
Learn more about prosecution from here:
https://brainly.com/question/23179189
#SPJ1
in eby, the supreme court stated allowing contractors to make a claim against architects would do which of the following:
In eby, the Court Decided that enabling contractors to sue architects would accomplish which of the following: produce a detrimental impact on the architect's impartiality or legal responsibility to the owner.
A court is any person or institution, frequently a government institution, with the jurisdiction to arbitrate legal disagreements between parties and administer justice in civil, penal, and administrative in conformity with the rule of law. Courts are the central mechanism of conflict resolution in both civil and common law legal systems, and it is widely assumed that everyone has the opportunity to bring their claim before such a court. Similarly, persons accused of a crime have the opportunity to provide a defense in court. The judiciary is the judicial system that interprets and executes the law. A venue is the location of a court.
learn more about legal responsibility here
https://brainly.com/question/27883274
#SPJ4
the burden of proof that a liquidated damages provision was unreasonable at the time of contracting rests on the party trying to:
The burden of proof that a liquidated damages provision was unreasonable at the time of contraction rests on the party trying to: "Avoid Payment."
What is Burden of Proof?
The duty to produce evidence relevant to the lawsuit or criminal accusation is known as the burden of proof.
The burden of proof in a civil action brought by one person against another belongs to that person. Each of the two parties involved would be asked to recount their own side of the story once the case received an official response and the trial process got underway. The plaintiff, the party who filed the lawsuit with the court, is responsible for proving that the allegations made in the lawsuit are true and that the other defendant is to blame for the harm or damages at issue.
To know more about Burden of Proof, click on the link given below:
https://brainly.com/question/22982480
#SPJ4
The signs of being impaired are always obvious true or false?
Answer:
Explanation:False
The statement is false as signs of impairment may not always be obvious and can vary depending on the individual and substance consumed.
Sometimes the symptoms of impairment are subtle. While some actions or physical characteristics, such as slurred speech, clumsy movements or bloodshot eyes, can indicate impairment not all symptoms are immediately apparent. It may be more difficult to identify some people's impairments because they can partially conceal or mask them.
The substance consumed, a person's tolerance and other factors can all affect how impairment appears. It is crucial to understand that impairment can have an impact on cognitive function, judgment and coordination even when there are no overt symptoms. Therefore, determining someone's impairment solely based on outward symptoms may not always be accurate.
learn more about signs of impairment here
brainly.com/question/31567687
#SPJ2
ead the following article by Sykes and Matza on Techniques of Neutralization. Then, respond to the following question:
How do Sykes and Matza’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur? Provide an (anonymous, i.e., do not identify someone by name) example of someone that you know personally or a case that has been well reported in the media where neutralizations are linked to crime or other problem behavior.
Sykes and Matze called these exonerations techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally clean or countervail their crimes and convert themselves into that they aren't really criminals.
What are techniques?Accomplishment is the ability to carry out a task with determined results. The knowledge base technique is any systematic way of acquiring information about a scientific nature. Ability to treat such details or use such social movement, and good piano state.
Sykes and Matze’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur in conditions techniques of neutralization because, by reacting to them, offenders were able to mentally
Therefore, Sykes and Matze called these justifications techniques of neutralization
Learn more about techniques here:
https://brainly.com/question/17130704
#SPJ1
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
Since Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. This scenario best exemplifies the use of electronic monitoring in home confinement.
What is an electronic surveillance system?A criminal's whereabouts may always be verified thanks to the EMS technique and tool. Using this technology, local government authorities can place a range of restrictions on a criminal. In recent years, defendants have been managed by EMS before trials.
It should be taken into consideration that the surveillance method known as "electronic tagging" uses an electronic gadget that is attached to a person. Several nations use an electronic tag that is fastened to the person's ankle as part of their bond or probation conditions. It is used in the fields of immigration and healthcare as well.
Learn more about electronic monitoring device from
https://brainly.com/question/6605512
#SPJ1
See full question below
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
a. wiretapping
b. shock incarceration
c. electronic monitoring
d. multichanneling
18. ellen was injured when she was struck by a car driven by matthew. at the time, ellen was crossing the street and matthew entered the intersection and not paying attention to the crosswalk while he was on the telephone, but the light was still yellow. ellen sustained substantial injuries and sued matthew for negligence. at trial, matthew testified that ellen caused the accident because ellen was crossing the street while the light was still yellow in matthew's favor. which of the following is matthew's best defense? a. superseding negligence of ellen. b. strict liability against jennifer. c. contributory negligence of ellen. d. none of the above.
Answer: c. contributory negligence of Ellen.
Explanation:
the ruling in miller v. california is a landmark decision by the u.s. supreme court in which the court redefined its definition of what constitutes obscenity. this definition has been translated into what is referred to as the miller test, a test for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled obscene, in which case the material is not protected by the first amendment and therefore becomes illegal. the miller test was developed in 1973 and has three parts, what are they?
The Miller test is the standard test which explains what constitues expression of obscenity.
Explain more about the Miller Test?
It was given by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. California (1973).It majorly dealt with many online and real time obscene cases. It is a standard test that is still used to determine many cases
The three parts which it include are:
appeals to the prurient interest of the people describes sexual conduct in a offensive way (patent offensiveness)lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.This is how Miller test is used and broken into many parts.
To know more about Miller test from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/14139451
#SPJ4
peer pressure __in why some teens get in a car with an impaired driver?
Answer: Some kids are a bad influence
Explanation: According to my studies, many teenagers build up a ball of rage inside their head. As a result, they peer pressure poor innocent children to feel happy. This is called a pyschopath.
Examine the following situations decide whether the search violates the fourth amendment.explain your decisions.
d.Pam is seen shoplifting in a store.police chase Pam into her apartment building and arrest her outside the closed door of her apartment.A search of her apartment reveals a large quantity of stolen goods.
e. Sandi is suspected of receiving stolen goods. The police go to her house and ask Claire,her roommate,if they can search the house.Claire gives them permission,and they find stolen in Sandis dresser
Pam is seen shoplifting in a store and Sandi is suspected of receiving stolen goods this suggests that there is a violation in the fourth amendment with respect to the case of Sandi.
What is the fourth amendment?The Bill of Rights is comprised of the Fourth Amendment to the U.s. Constitutional. It outlaws arbitrary warrantless searches.
In this situation where families have been seen shifting or is being seen to be taking the goods from a store. This music that she is a criminal police had the right to search her apartment but if a person is suspected without having any kind of proof which is the case of Sandi and still her house is being investigated without her permission then it is a violation of the 4th amendment right.
Learn more about fourth amendment, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8244125
#SPJ1
44. Driver often believe an approaching truck i traveling lower than it actually i
Answer:
Is this a question or a statement? Please clarify.
Explanation:
Can you remember the four (4) traditional rules of statutory interpretation?
Answer:
There are four Rules of Statutory Interpretation, these are (1) the literal rule, (2) the golden rule, (3) the mischief rule and (4) the purposive approach.
Assume that an individual resides in Arlington County, meets the DSM criteria for a substance use disorder, and has agreed to plea guilty to their alleged crime (in addition to a 12-month suspended sentence). Given these facts, which of the following statements about that same individual participating in Arlington County's Drug Court is the MOST true?
They could participate in drug court if they also had no prior convictions for violent weapons or felony offenses.
They could participate in drug court is they also had no probation or supervision obligations outside of Arlington County.
They could participate in drug court if they also had no prior convictions for violent weapons or felony offenses and no probation or supervision obligations outside of Arlington County.
It is impossible to answer this question with the information provided.
Option 3. This individual would be able to participate in the drug court based on this option: They could participate in drug court if they also had no prior convictions for violent weapons or felony offenses and no probation or supervision obligations outside of Arlington County.
What is meant by drug court?Drug courts are specialized court docket initiatives that focus on criminal defendants and offenders, young offenders, and parents involved in ongoing child welfare proceedings who have issues with alcohol and other drugs.
Drug courts may differ in their intended audience, program structure, and service resources, but they often follow a well-rounded model that includes:
Risk, need, and responsiveness screening for offenders.judicial dialogue.Monitoring and supervision, such as drug testing.graduated penalties and rewards.services for treatment and rehabilitation.A non-adversarial, multidisciplinary team that includes judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, community prisons, social workers, and treatment service specialists typically runs drug courts. Through participation in hearings, programming, and celebrations like graduation, stakeholders representing law enforcement, the family, and the community are invited to offer their support.
Read more on drug courts here: https://brainly.com/question/14673992
#SPJ1
Is home life affected by drug addiction?
A. Yes, it's always affected.
B. No, it's not affected.
C. Only if you don't know how to manage your addiction.
Yes, home life is always affected by drug addiction. Thus, option A. "Yes, it's always affected" is correct.
Addiction to drugs can have an effective impact on family life. Addicts may disregard their responsibilities, use drugs more frequently, and exhibit irritability and unpredictable behavior. Conflict with family members, money issues, and even physical abuse can result from this.
Children may additionally suffer harm as a result of drug addiction. Violence, neglect, and other forms of abuse could be experienced by the children of addicts. Additionally, they could be required to shoulder greater responsibilities at home, which can be demanding and exhausting.
Therefore, the correct option is A.
Learn more about drug addiction, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31930020
#SPJ5
roe v. wade and other major court cases often make their way through the court system ending with the court of final appeal, more commonly known as
There are three main levels to the federal court system: district courts, which are the trial court, circuit courts, which are the first level of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the last level of appeal in the federal system, are the three levels of appeal.
What is the court's final decision?
the final court decision that settles all disputed issues and the parties' rights in relation to those issues. The only decisions left after a final judgment are how to enforce the judgment, whether to award costs, and whether to appeal.
What are the three ways that an appeal to the Supreme Court can be handled?
appeals through state and federal courts, appeals through the original jurisdiction.
Learn more about Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/25903338
#SPJ4
in the contemporary (bge) mirror setting, the sideview mirror is set to see the lane next to your vehicle.
The sideview mirror in the conventional (bge) mirror setting is designed to observe the area next to your vehicles. It is correct.
A convention, in the meaning of a meeting, is a group of individuals who assemble at a predetermined location and time to talk or engage in some mutual interest. The most prevalent conventions are based on industry, career, and fandom. Trade conventions often focus on a certain sector or industry segment and include keynotes, vendor displays, and other knowledge and activities of interest to event organisers and attendees. Professional conferences focus on issues of interest as well as advancements in the profession. Such gatherings are typically conducted by societies or community dedicated to the advancement of the topic of interest.
Learn more about vehicles here
https://brainly.com/question/27981487
#SPJ4
What role do executive departments and agencies play in fulfilling the constitutional duties of the executive branch?.
Role of Excutive department and agencies are
They translate the laws passed by Congress into enforceable rules and procedures.Regulates major industries and organizations according to federal law.Manages the day-to-day operations of the federal governmentExecutive branch power is vested in the President of the Country who also serves as head of state and commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The president is responsible for implementing and enforcing laws written by Congress, and to that end he appoints the heads of federal agencies, including the government. The vice president is also part of the executive branch and is ready to take over the presidency when needed.
The Cabinet and independent federal agencies are responsible for the day-to-day enforcement and administration of federal laws. These departments and agencies have missions and responsibilities as vastly different as the Department of Defense and the Environmental Protection Agency, the Social Security Administration, and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
To learn more about Excutive department, refer :
https://brainly.com/question/15549622
#SPJ4
Miranda v. arizona if we are all charged with knowing the law, how could the court find that miranda needed to be informed of his rights by the state? could miranda be tried again for the same crime? what justification would the court have in imposing such a burden on the police? would they not be practicing law by giving such legal advice? was excluding the evidence (the confession) the only sanction available to the u.s. supreme court? can you think of some other sanctions that would still allow such evidence to be used but protect the innocent person who might be subjected to such treatment.
Miranda vs . Arizona occurred in 1996. the In this the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects before police questioning, must be properly informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Explain Miranda vs Arizona case.
In this case it was established that the Police need to make you aware about your Miranda Rights after an arrest and before questioning. It was established under 5 and 6 amendments of the US constitution.
It has provided detainees with the right to not to self incriminate along with the right to humanise their life.In the case of Miranda, he was tried and convicted again, without using the confession against him.In the final Outcome his conviction was overturned.This was the final result of the Miranda vs Arizona case.
To know more about Miranda vs Arizona from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/13483624
#SPJ4
pete's pizza employs quincy as a delivery driver. pete's guarantees that an order will be delivered within thirty minutes or there is no charge, and insists that its drivers meet the limit. one night, while making a delivery, quincy is caught in a traffic jam. to deliver the pizza within the thirty-minute time limit, quincy drives onto a sidewalk and hits ruth, a pedestrian. is pete's liable to ruth for her injuries? is quincy liable to ruth? why or why not?
In this case, Pete is liable for the damages to Ruth
Why does this happen?
According to the law, employers are liable for the actions of their employees. It is the duty of the employer to provide time to time training to their employees and teach them to be limit and rules and regulations. Damage caused by Quincy will be liability of Pete's Pizza now.
It will be considered as a mistake of the company, and currently, the company is liable for the actions of their employees. The needs of the company would differ and has contracts, conditions with the other company as well.
Hence, In this case Pete is liable for the damages to Ruth
To learn more about Liability from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/9503055
#SPJ4
at the defendant's trial for stealing an automobile, the defendant called a character witness who testified that the defendant had an excellent reputation for honesty. in rebuttal, the prosecutor calls another witness to testify that he recently saw the defendant cheat on a college examination. the prosecution witness's testimony should be
The prosecution witness's testimony should be:
The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.
What do you mean by cross examination?
The proper examination and questioning of a witness by the adverse party is known as cross-examination. It gives the opposing party a chance to determine the weaknesses of a witness's testimony.
The main aim of cross examination is to strengthen an individual's case. The scope of cross-examination is confirming the witness's testimony, knowledge, and credibility
Rules of Cross-Examination
Asking Questions Only.Inclusion of New Fact Per Question.Break questions into a Series of Logical ProgressionsHence ,The prosecution witness's testimony should be excluded, because the defendant's cheating can be inquired into only on cross-examination of the defendant's witness.
To know more about Cross examination from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/28114975
#SPJ4
at the majority of crime scenes, the execution of the search warrant involves the first step of knock, arrest, and seize. True or False
At the majority of murder scenes, the first step in executing a search warrant is to knock, grab, and seize. False.
A warrant is a financial security that authorizes the holder to purchase or sell shares, often the shares of the issuing corporation, at a fixed price known as the exercise price. Warrants and choices are similar in that both contractual financial instruments grant the holder special rights to purchase securities. Both are optional and have expiry dates. They differ primarily in that warrants are exclusively issued by particular number of educational and in certain technical features of their trading and execution. Warrants are typically linked to bonds or preferred shares as an enticement, allowing the seller to pay reduced interest rates or dividend. They can be used to increase the yield on the bond and make it more appealing to potential buyers.
Learn more about murder here
https://brainly.com/question/19271039
#SPJ4
This is the official attorney responsible for representing the state/people agains
accused individuals.
O judge
O public defender
O prosecutor
O private attorney
ASSIGNMENT
Frank lives and works in a city. He owns numerous tracts of land in a county outside the city where he hunts and fishes. Mike, who has never met Frank, starts living in a cabin in a remote section of Frank's land. At first Mike just stayed on the week-ends, but for the last 22 years he has made the cabin his home and made improvements to it. Mike now claims the cabin and surrounding area he possesses is his property.
Explain what factors represent each element of adverse possession. Will Mike get title to the land?
The 22 years, without interruption, that Mike used Frank's land and the fact that Frank did not claim or oppose it establish the elements of possession and time of adverse possession. The fact that Mike gave a function to the used land represents the element called the skillful thing of adverse possession.
Milke will obtain title to the land.
How to explain the elements of adverse possession?Skillful thing: Mik gave a social function to a land that had potential but was not being used.Time: Make spent a lot of time without an interruption in this land.Ownership: Frank, as the owner of the land, has not claimed ownership in 22 years.Adverse possession is a legal way of acquiring the property rights of a private asset that has been without social function for a long time.
In this case, to establish adverse possession on a piece of land, someone must invade some privately owned land, build a residence and live there for many years uninterrupted.
Furthermore, the legal owner of these lands must not claim them during these years, allowing another individual to continue using them for a long time.
Adverse possession is a way to avoid the accumulation of properties, mainly those that have no function and are not used by their owners.
Although adverse possession is a legal system, it does not apply to public goods, as the law considers that these goods belong to the entire community and are used by it in different ways.
Learn more about public goods:
https://brainly.com/question/14664702
#SPJ1
Which of the following statements are true? (Check all that apply)
a. EMT levels of certification are standardized at a national level.
b. The paramedic has studied and is able to deliver advanced life support in emergency situations.
c. All EMTs must be 21 or older.
d. EMT-B and paramedics are trained and can respond to 911 emergencies.
The statements that are true are option A, B and D:
a. EMT levels of certification are standardized at a national level.
b. The paramedic has studied and is able to deliver advanced life support in emergency situations.
d. EMT-B and paramedics are trained and can respond to 911 emergencies.
What is the youngest age to be an EMT?While paramedics can use their additional training to provide medical aid in a variety of more specific situations, EMTs typically respond to 911 calls in an ambulance. For instance, they might function as a paramedic-firefighter for a fire department.
To determine whether the patient is experiencing cardiac arrest and to begin resuscitation, EMTs and paramedics may evaluate the scene. Additionally, they send the patient to the most suitable facility for final care, which is typically the hospital that is closest and has the greatest facilities for treating cardiac arrest patients.
Note that all Candidates need to: Be at least 18 years old. The written consent of a parent or legal guardian is required for 16- and 17-year-old applicants for Emergency Medical Responder and EMT positions.
Learn more about EMT certification from
https://brainly.com/question/28046895
#SPJ1