Answer:
z = -0.75
Explanation:
First is to combine all z variables (to do this, let's add +z to both sides):
2+8z=-4
Now, let's put all of the integers on the right side of the equation:
8z=-6
Divide by 8 on both sides:
[tex]z=-\frac{6}{8}[/tex]
Simplify:
[tex]z=-\frac{3}{4}[/tex]
Also:
z = -0.75
In which of the following situations would it be safe to use an AED?
The victim's chest is covered in water.
The victim's chest is covered in water.
There are flammable materials nearby.
There are flammable materials nearby.
The victim is lying in a small puddle of water.
The victim is lying in a small puddle of water.
None of the above are safe situations.
None of the above are safe situations would be safe to use an AED. Thus, option A is correct.
What is AED?When a person is having a coronary heart death, an AED, or advanced airway generator, is employed to assist them. It is an advanced but simple-to-use surgical device that can detect the heart rate and, if appropriate, provide shocks, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, to aid in the heart's re-establishment of an efficient pulse.
As most of the material which is present is flammable or has water or is injurious. So using AED software would not be safe at that point of time. It would rather harm the people on which they are using or the person who is using it can also be harmed by it. this can be a treatment but need the correct environment and care.
Therefore, option A is the correct option.
Learn more about AED, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12947126
#SPJ1
ANSWER
Using the drop-down menus, choose the correct word or phrase to correctly complete each sentence.
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of
*The New York Times*
.
The government used
*prior restraint*
by preventing The New York Times from printing the documents.
The main result of the case was to
*limit prior restraint*
.
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the New York Times.
The government used prior restraint by preventing The New York Times from printing the documents.
The main result of the case was to limit prior restraint.
What was the pentagon papers case?According to the Pentagon Papers, American soldiers were still being sent to fight in a lost war by Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson. Presidents, generals, and other government representatives had lied to the public to defend these actions. A breach of the Geneva Convention had occurred
The Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protects the right to publish all statements. According to the Court, a public official must demonstrate genuine malice, which is "knowing that it was untrue or reckless contempt for the truth," in order to establish libel.
In an effort to stop the Times from printing more of the records, the government swiftly filed a court injunction. They claimed that doing so would jeopardize national security.
Read more on the pentagon papers here:https://brainly.com/question/3908633
#SPJ1
what is the answer in canvas
Answer:
The third one. Specific, Measurable, Achievable, relevant/realistic, and time-bound/time framed.
Explanation: