Answer:
more important than what
True or False? All crashes are accidents.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
How might alcohol and drugs affect a person’s weight
Answer: substances can produce profound metabolic changes, which can cause weight loss. Drug and alcohol abuse can also lead to behavior changes in eating habits, which can affect food intake.
Explanation:
What is the major weakness of the literal approach to statutory
interpretation?
The major weakness of the literal approach to statutory interpretation is that It might produce outcomes that look unfair and go against the wishes of Parliament.
What is meant by the statutory interpretation?Statutory construction, also known as statutory interpretation, is the process through which courts apply and interpret the law.
Using the legal principle of statutory interpretation, a judge tries to comprehend and apply the law to a specific situation. Judges apply this approach because it's possible that municipal, state, and federal laws don't cover particular circumstances that arise after they're written. Additionally, judges use statutory interpretation to determine the applicability of little-used or outdated legislation in current cases.
Read more on statutory law here: https://brainly.com/question/864793
#SPJ1
what is philosophy?
Answer:
Philosophy is the systematized study of general and fundamental questions, such as those about existence, reason, knowledge, values, mind, and language. Such questions are often posed as problems to be studied or resolved.
Explanation:
hope this helped you
unhappy with the decision passed by a lower court in a civil rights violation case, anastasia files her case with the united states supreme court, hoping that the court will take it up for review. in this case, the supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case. select one: a. writ of habeas corpus b. writ of mandamus c. writ of certiorari d. writ of mens rea
The supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case BY writ of Certiorari.
hence, option C is correct.
What is writ of certiorari?
This is a request that the Supreme Court can order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review. In this if atleast 4 judges hear the case it will be heard and discussed. It can be applied by any member of public.
Sometimes it is also called as judicial Writ. It can be granted when amounts to abuse of discretion or lack or excess of jurisdiction. It cab be granted in any civil, criminal or judicial cases.
Hence, The supreme court can accept anastasia's appeal by issuing a to the lower court handling her case BY writ of Certiorari.
hence, option C is correct.
To learn more about writ of certiorari from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/12106865
#SPJ4
5. Beth is driving her car down the street when Tom, who was behind a bush, tries to run across the street. Beth’s car strikes Tom. Beth knew that her car’s brakes were bad.
1. Beth is responsible for the accident.
2. Beth is not negligent.
3. Tom is the only negligent party to this happening.
4. None of the above.
Beth is responsible for the accident is the correct answer.
The which means of a twist of fate may be defined in several methods; however, the maximum primary definition is whilst a voluntary action results in harm or death.
The act that causes injury or death isn't generally deemed dangerous and is generally performed without severe consequences. accident: an occasion that affects in injury or ill fitness. incident: close to omit: an occasion no longer causing harm,
however, has the potential to motive damage or unwell fitness (in this steering, the term near pass over will include risky occurrences)the principle distinction between 'twist of fate' and 'incident' is the former does bring about private harm or assets damage. even as the latter would not result in private damage. while we call something a "twist of fate" it means that no one is at fault and that no one, such as the driving force, bears responsibility for the outcome. The time period "crash," alternatively, is more unique in phrases of the motion's outcome without the unpreventable implication.Learn more about accident here: https://brainly.com/question/24452126
#SPJ1
the charging document for a felony crime is the indictment; in a misdemeanor criminal case, this charge is called the . a. complaint b. information c. affidavit d. subpoena
The indictment is the charging document for a felony offence; the complaint is the charging document in a misdemeanour criminal case. A pleading that brings criminal charges against a defendant is known as a charging document. It—not an arrest—marks the start of a criminal investigation.
A charging document is any declaration made by the Commission that an individual or group has broken one of the laws under its purview. A felony prosecution must start with an indictment in the federal system according to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
In Minnesota, a police officer may also issue a citation for a misdemeanour or petty misdemeanour. Many of them are also frequently referred to as "traffic tickets" or "traffic citations," Charge-making documents include complaints, informations, and indictments.
To know more about document click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/7444017
#SPJ4
Evaluate the legal nature of the Letters of Credit and Performance Guarantee and identify the statute laws that govern it.
The major reason for describing the constitutional validity of the Letters of Credit and Performer Guaranteed and identifying the statute laws which govern are to solve issues and operations.
What is laws?The term “law” refers to a system of rules created by authorities and governments. The law's objective is to safeguard citizens against the abuses of others. The law exists on three levels: local, state, and national.
The structure are the description are the solve in the activities, and it was in the issuance are the letter of credit and performances, according to the laws that are in the legal constitutional provisions.
Hence, the significance of the laws aforementioned.
Learn more about on laws, here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ1
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
Since Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. This scenario best exemplifies the use of option C: electronic monitoring in home confinement.
What is a system for electronic surveillance?An offender's whereabouts may always be confirmed thanks to the method and device known as EMS. Local government agencies are able to impose a variety of restrictions on a criminal using this technology. Recently, EMS has been utilized to manage defendants prior to trial.
Note that An electronic device attached to a person is used in the surveillance technique known as "electronic tagging." As part of their bond or probation requirements, several countries utilize an electronic tag that is attached to the person's ankle. In addition, it is applied in the domains of immigration and healthcare.
Learn more about electronic monitoring from
https://brainly.com/question/4523474
#SPJ1
See full question below
Savio is convicted of robbery and is sentenced to home confinement for two years. He is required to wear a "continuously signaling" device around his wrist to limit his movement to a one-mile radius around his home. This scenario best exemplifies the use of _____ in home confinement.
a. wiretapping
b. shock incarceration
c. electronic monitoring
d. multichanneling
Do you agree with the restrictions placed on “Freedom to Assembly”? Explain why/why not.
Freedom of Assembly permits citizens to raise issues, call for change, and get responses from public figures. Without the right to assemble, there are fewer avenues for citizens to access information between elections and chances for engagement in transparent government.
Can the right to assemble be restricted?
A public authority may occasionally impose restrictions on your freedom of assembly and association. This only applies in situations when the authorities can demonstrate that the action was justified in order to safeguard public safety or national security. avert chaos or criminality. Gatherings that pose other imminent hazards to public safety may also be stopped or prevented by authorities.
To know more about Freedom of Assembly click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/7954791
#SPJ1
Logic models are used to
A logic model is essentially a methodical and visual means to convey and communicate your knowledge of the connections between the tools you have at your disposal to run your program, the actions you want to take, and the modifications or outcomes you wish to accomplish.
What are Logic models?Generally, Logic models are explanations of the chain of causes and effects that are thought to lead to a certain conclusion that is of interest.
In conclusion, Although they may be presented in a narrative format, logic models more often than not take the form of graphical depictions of the "if-then" linkages that exist between the many components that lead to the end.
Read more about Logic models
https://brainly.com/question/17372961
#SPJ1
Question 2 (1 point)
Which of the following statements about malicious prosecution is true?
All U.S. courts permit a suit for wrongful civil proceedings.
The criminal proceeding must terminate in the plaintiff's favor in order for his
suit to be sustained.
O
It is the tort of causing someone to be prosecuted for a criminal act, knowing
that there was probable cause to believe that the plaintiff committed the crime.
The defendant must show that the plaintiff acted with some purpose other than
bringing the guilty to justice.
A mere complaint to the authorities is sufficient to establish the tort.
Question 3 (1 point)
Answer:
true because is True you say
What ethical considerations do human resource teams need to take into account
when developing harassment or affirmation action policies?
Being a company's moral compass, Human Resource teams who uphold high moral standards and try to create a fair workplace will keep employees' confidence and draw in new applicants.
Here are six HR ethics rules that businesses may adhere to in order to master the art of moral decision-making and establish themselves as a valued resource for their staff.
1) Maintain information privacy: HR professionals have access to a variety of sensitive data about employees, including social security numbers and medical records. You may relax knowing that the information about your firm is safe by making sure that paper documents and computer systems are secure.
2) Put diversity and inclusion policies into practice Nowadays, discussions regarding diversity frequently centre on efforts to recruit people of all races, classes, and genders.
3) Recognize potential conflict of interest
4) Act as an ethical HR leader: This entails having faith in your moral judgments and convincingly articulating them to staff members.
5)Prioritize your professional growth: HR is a topic that is continuously evolving, particularly as new discussions emerge and technology continues to transform how we work.
6) Be aware of the law: HR professionals must take decisive action as an organization's representative and hold violators of the law accountable.
What is a good HRM ethics example?
For instance, there are some rights that cannot be compromised, such as the right to privacy and the right to appropriate recompense for the labor performed.
Therefore maintaining ethics is very much important by human resource teams.
To learn more about human resource teams from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/13135400
#SPJ1
How might GPS monitoring be used to overhaul the American bail system? Would these changes improve the bail system? What might be some of the unintended negative consequences of allowing defendants to go “free on GPS monitoring” before trial?
The way that GPS monitoring be used to overhaul the American bail system is that GPS monitoring the will help take down the location of their wearers and as such there is no need to physically check on the wearer.
Some of the unintended negative consequences of allowing defendants to go “free on GPS monitoring” before trial is that they may escape or even commit a greater crime.
What is the history of ankle monitors?Social psychologists created ankle monitors for the first time in the 1960s in an effort to provide young offenders with constructive reinforcement. In the 1980s and early 1990s, the justice system began to employ them.
Ankle bands, ankle shackles, and tethers are common examples of electronic monitoring devices that use GPS tracking systems to follow the whereabouts of their wearers. This includes those who are going through immigration procedures, are on probation or parole, or are awaiting trial.
Note that studies has demonstrated that those under GPS monitoring saw much lower recidivism rates than those under traditional supervision.
Learn more about GPS monitoring from
https://brainly.com/question/9795929
#SPJ1
What is the influence of crime investigation TV series on the public's perception of law enforcement work and courtroom
procedures called?
The influence of crime investigation TV series on the public's perception of law enforcement work and courtroom procedures is called the CSI effect.
The exaggerated portrayal of forensic science on crime television programs like CSI: Crime Scene Investigation affects public perception in a number of different ways, including the "CSI effect."
Most frequently, it alludes to the idea that juries have started to demand more forensic evidence in criminal trials, placing the actual burden of proof on the prosecution.
Although this is a widely held opinion among American legal professionals, some researchers contend that while regular CSI viewers may have a diminished regard for circumstantial evidence, crime shows are unlikely to have such an impact.
To learn more about CSI effect visit: https://brainly.com/question/12000529
#SPJ9
Mandy volunteered in a month-long sleep study at the university last year. She was asked to participate because of her unusual sleep habits and neurological history. Part of the sleep study included her sleeping in a room inside the lab for the entire month. She was videotaped while she slept. Now, 13 months later, police are trying to charge Mandy with possession and use of illegal drugs. It turns out she was using drugs during her stay at the sleep lab. Her drug use was recorded in the lab videos. She's not sure how or why the police saw the videos. She knew she was being videotaped, although she was told it was only for the study and that no one outside the lab would view the footage.
Would the video evidence be helpful in proving the case? (Answer in one to two sentences. Explain your reasoning.)
No, the video cannot be used as evidence in this instance because Mandy was only videotaped as part of an experiment and her agreement only applied to the sleep study.
She was also certain that, as per the agreement between her and the group who carried out the experiment, the tapes would not be made public.
What is neurology?The field of medicine known as neurology is responsible for the diagnosis and care of all disorders and illnesses affecting the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves.
The discipline of neuroscience, the scientific study of the nervous system, is very important to neurological practice.
Learn more about neurology, from:
brainly.com/question/7165863
#SPJ1
an alcohol license, once granted, becomes a right and cannot be taken away except in the event the proprietor sells the business.
Once obtained, an alcohol licence becomes a right that cannot be revoked unless the owner sells the business. This assertion is untrue. To work in a bar or other establishment that sells alcohol, you are not required to have a personal licence. A designated premises is required for locations with alcohol sales permits.
Many liquor licences outline the precise hours that alcohol may be offered within the business. The sale of alcohol after 2:00 a.m. is prohibited in many states. State-by-state and even city-by-city variations in laws and regulations are possible.
But every state has a number of methods through which a company, like a bar or restaurant, can lose its liquor licence. Selling alcohol to people under the legal drinking age is arguably the surest way for a business to lose its liquor licence.
To know more about licences click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/4410292
#SPJ4
because police always observe the crimes that occur, they are at an advantage in being able to quickly arrest offenders. True/False
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Police cannot always observe crimes that are committed at all times, as that would be impossible (most crimes occur in secret).
5. Which Supreme Court case established that evidence obtained through unreasonable searches and seizures, in violation of the Fourth
Amendment, may not be used in state courts for state law criminal prosecutions?
Chandler v. Browning
Wilson v. Griswold
Keller v. Florida
O Mapp v. Ohio
Supreme Court case established that evidence obtained through unreasonable searches and seizures, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, may not be used in state courts for state law criminal prosecutions in Mapp v. Ohio. The correct option is (D).
What do you mean by the Fourth Amendment?
The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution safeguards citizens from arbitrary government searches and seizures.
Only those searches and seizures that are ruled legally unreasonable are protected by the Fourth Amendment, though.
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Fourth Amendment's safeguards against unreasonable searches and seizures were tightened, making it unlawful to introduce non-warranted evidence into a state court criminal prosecution.
Therefore, the supreme Court case established that evidence obtained through unreasonable searches and seizures, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, may not be used in state courts for state law criminal prosecutions in Mapp v. Ohio.
To know more about the Fourth Amendment, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28246295
#SPJ1
What was the outcome of the Casey Anthony case?
Casey was not found guilty of first-degree murder, aggravated child abuse, and aggravated manslaughter of a kid. She WAS found guilty of 4 misdemeanor counts of providing false information to law enforcement though.
Hope this helps!!!! : D
What is the major weakness of the literal approach to statutory
interpretation?
The most significant drawback of adhering strictly to a literal rule is the possibility that it could lead to results that seem unjust and may even go against the intent of Parliament.
What is an example of the rule taken literally?In the case of Fisher v. Bell, the application of the literal rule is shown by an example (1960). With the passage of the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act in 1959, it became illegal to sell some offensive weapons, such as flick knives, to the general public.
In conclusion, The most important downside of closely sticking to a literal rule is the chance that it could lead to outcomes that seem unfair and may even go against the purpose of Parliament. This is the most significant disadvantage of rigorously adhering to a rule.
Read more about literal rule
https://brainly.com/question/28108568
#SPJ1
Supply chain and operations management in my previous
workplace as a merchandiser at mall
Answer:
You got this! Determine which equation is false, based on the solution set S:{4}.
3t = 12
3m + 7 = 14
4(4c + 1) = 68
9 = 5p − 11
Explanation:
To check the area on the right side of your vehicle, you should:
To check the area on the right side of your vehicle, you should: Turn your chin to your shoulder and glance towards the back out of the right side rear window.
What is a blind spot?A blind spot can be defined as an area or portion to either side of a vehicle, as well as the back (rear end) of a vehicle that is typically outside the field of vision of a driver, especially because it is not visible in the rear view mirror.
As a good driver, the most appropriate and acceptable ways to check the area on the right side of your vehicle is by turning your chin to your shoulder and then glance towards the blind spot through the right side rear window.
In conclusion, it is very wrong, inappropriate and unacceptable to glance towards the blind spot through your side window.
Read more on good blind spot here: https://brainly.com/question/17120761
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
To check the area on the right side of your vehicle, you should:
Look in the interior rear-view mirror.
Turn your chin to your shoulder and glance towards the back out of the right side rear window.
Turn your chin to your shoulder and glance towards the back out the driver's side window.
Look in the exterior right side rear-view mirror.
When a defendant faces a negligence lawsuit, what defenses are available?.
when a defendant faces a Negligence lawsuit , the defenses are
.assumption of riskcomparative faultcontributory negligencenecessityNegligence is a cause of action under general tort law. A negligence claim can arise when a person suffers damage because another party was negligent or did not exercise the same level of care that the average person would use in the same or similar circumstances.
Defences avaliabile in Negligence are
Risk Assumption: Risk assumption is a type of legal defense that can be used against claims of negligence. Essentially, the presumption of the risk defense is that the plaintiff knew the risks involved in a particular activity, but continued to participate in the activity despite the danger, and therefore should not be allowed to seek compensation for injuries. says. If the defendant wins this defense, the plaintiff cannot seek damages in the lawsuit.
Plaintiffs must also have taken these risks voluntarily before undertaking any activity.
Contributory Negligence: Contributory negligence may exist if the plaintiff is found to have committed negligence and contributed to his own damages. In such scenarios, both the defendant and the plaintiff acted improperly or negligently, which combined to the detriment the plaintiff. Had the plaintiff been less negligent than the defendant, they might have avoided the situation entirely and suffered no injury. may have collided with another driver's vehicle.
To learn more about Negligence, refer :
https://brainly.com/question/20619986
#SPJ4
some states placed restrictions on intrastate and interstate branches. given this development, what law gave the states the legal framework to do this? what additional law closed a potential loophole in interstate banking? what law changed these restrictions?
The McFadden Act of 1927 and other laws that tried to address long-standing concerns about the concentration of financial activity and concerns that large banking organizations operating in multiple states could not be adequately supervised were largely responsible for these restrictions.
Why did we remove restrictions on banking between states?
After it became clear that restrictions on interstate banking restricted banks' ability to expand regionally and made them vulnerable to local economic crises, regulations were eventually relaxed.
What resulted from the Riegle-Neal Act?
Banks can open branches in other states thanks to the Interstate Act, also known as the Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.
Learn more about banking here:
https://brainly.com/question/25642105
#SPJ4
it is easier to incriminate a young person for infringing on copyright rules under the dmca than to incriminate an older person.
Not always has the Digital Millennium Copyright Act been applied as intended. The DMCA has NOT been abused in this manner. Younger people are simpler to incriminate for violating copyright laws under the DMCA than older people are.
People have faced several threats since the internet's invention. Infringing on copyright is one of them. With only one click, anyone can browse millions of websites and post something on social media networks by editing someone else's original work—submitting research papers is a common example of this type of editing.
The infringement of someone's intellectual property is known as copyright (IP). It is another word for piracy or the theft of someone else's original work, particularly when the perpetrator reaps the rewards rather than the original author.
To know more about copyright click here:-
https://brainly.com/question/14704862
#SPJ4
difference did mccabe and fajardo find between accredited and non-accredited law enforcement agencies
This study provides a comparison of specific agency characteristics between accredited and nonaccredited law-enforcement agencies.
An article on accreditation that was investigated was named, "Law enforcement agencies: A public correlation of accredited versus non accredited organizations."
(McCabe and Fajardo, 2010). This article comes according to another viewpoint, that point of view being from the schooling field rather than coming from a law enforcement organization.
In the theoretical, it is examined that most past compositions have been about "only conversation of license or observational assessments of officials' discernments on the license process." (McCabe and Fajardo, 2010) The review searched out to give a more top to bottom examination of accredited organizations instead of non-accredited offices.
The review zeroed in on an exploration approach of information gathered from the "LawEnforcement The executives and Regulatory Measurements, 1993: Information for Individual State furthermore, Neighborhood Offices with At least 100 Officials (LEMAS) and CALEA's April 1998 rundown of accredited organizations." The five factors audited were:
Field preparing hours;
Least instructive prerequisites for beginning officials;
Strategy for drug-testing-sworn police candidates;
The activity of an extraordinary medication unit; and
The activity of an extraordinary kid misuse unit.
to know more about the accreditation click here:
https://brainly.com/question/22560558
#SPJ4
This study provides a comparison of specific agency characteristics between accredited and nonaccredited law-enforcement agencies.
An article on accreditation that was investigated was named, "Law enforcement agencies: A public correlation of accredited versus non accredited organizations."
(McCabe and Fajardo, 2010). This article comes according to another viewpoint, that point of view being from the schooling field rather than coming from a law enforcement organization.
In the theoretical, it is examined that most past compositions have been about "only conversation of license or observational assessments of officials' discernments on the license process." (McCabe and Fajardo, 2010) The review searched out to give a more top to bottom examination of accredited organizations instead of non-accredited offices.
The review zeroed in on an exploration approach of information gathered from the "LawEnforcement The executives and Regulatory Measurements, 1993: Information for Individual State furthermore, Neighborhood Offices with At least 100 Officials (LEMAS) and CALEA's April 1998 rundown of accredited organizations." The five factors audited were:
Field preparing hours;
Least instructive prerequisites for beginning officials;
Strategy for drug-testing-sworn police candidates;
The activity of an extraordinary medication unit; and
The activity of an extraordinary kid misuse unit.
to know more about the accreditation click here:
brainly.com/question/22560558
#SPJ4
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.References:Collins, J. C.,
Because the student properly cited (in--text) the source of the quote relating to research, and also included the full details of the author in the bibliography, the issue of plagiarism, therefore, is nullified.
What is plagiarism?The act of copying another person's work without acknowledging them, citing them properly or including their names in the bibliography of the work is called plagiarism.
One of the ways to correct the above or avoid it altogether is to ensure that one's work is as original as possible. All citations must be noted that properly acknowledged according to the source form from which it came.
Learn more about plagiarism:
https://brainly.com/question/24405302
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Original Source Material
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Student Source Material
Research conducted by Collins and Porras (2002) highlights the importance of establishing and committing to an ideology comprised of two parts: (1) core values; (2) a core purpose. In my personal experience it seems easier to define a core ideology than to live it consistently.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
Word-for-Word plagiarismParaphrasing plagiarismThis is not plagiarismHints: Item 2
before the weeks v united states which of the following was not a consequence for the police when they unconstitutionally seized evidence
Evidence excluded at trial was not a consequence for the police when they unconstitutionally seized evidence. The exclusionary rule bars the government from using the majority of evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution.
Weeks is subject to the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures, and the evidence seized as a result must be excluded from his prosecution. The Court ruled unanimously that the seizure of items from Weeks' home directly violated his constitutional rights.
Here is the complete question-
Before the Weeks v. United States, which of the following was not a consequence for police when the unconstitutionally seized evidence?
a. Civil suits for the return of property.
b. Civil suits for damages.
c. Internal administrative discipline.
d. Evidence excluded at trial.
Learn more on evidence -
https://brainly.com/question/9306796
#SPJ4
Read the following article by Sykes and Matza on Techniques of Neutralization. Then, respond to the following question:
How do Sykes and Matza’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur? Provide an (anonymous, i.e., do not identify someone by name) example of someone that you know personally or a case that has been well reported in the media where neutralizations are linked to crime or other problem behavior.
These arguments were dubbed "neutralization strategies" by Sykes and Matza because they allowed wrongdoers to psychologically clean up or neutralize their misdeeds, convincing themselves that they weren't actually criminals.
A general description of when neutralization leads to crime is as follows: according to Neutralization and Drift Theory, minors feel obligated to the law. Most of the time, this legal responsibility remains in force. When this commitment is stressed, however, young delinquents tend to slip towards criminality.
Who are Sykes and Matza?Sykes and David Matza developed what is now known as the neutralization theory. According to Sykes and Matza, when criminals consider doing illegal activities, they employ language strategies to alleviate their guilt. This allows them to perpetrate crime while preserving their self-esteem.
Gresham Sykes and David Matza, criminologists, proposed the hypothesis in 1957, claiming that juvenile delinquents alternate between law-abiding and law-breaking conduct.
Learn more about Neutralization:
https://brainly.com/question/14211760
#SPJ1