Yoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

please mark this answer as brainlist

Answer: 1.5 less than 15 is divided by a number d.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C. 42 square units

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a rectangle and to calculate the area of a rectangle we multiply length and width

The length of this rectangle is 7 units and the width is 6 units

6 × 7 = 42 square units

Answer:

Option A, 4

Step-by-step explanation:

f(-2) = -(-2)³-3×(-2)²+8

= 8-12+8

= 16-12

= 4

Answer:

3 pennies, 9 nickels, and 6 dimes

Step-by-step explanation:

We have three conditions:

(1)         p +        n +        d = 18

(2) 0.01p + 0.05n + 0.10d = 1.08

(3)                                   d = 2p

Multiply (2) by 100 and rearrange (3) to get a standard array.

(4)      p +   n +     d =   18

(5)      p + 5n + 10d = 108

(6)  -2p          +     d =    0

Subtract (4) from (5). This gives

(4)      p +   n +   d =  18

(7)            4n + 9d = 90

(6)  -2p          +   d =   0

Multiply (4) by 2 and add to (6). This gives

(4) p +   n +    d =  18

(7)        4n + 9d = 90

(8)        2n + 3d = 36

Double (8) and subtract from (7). This gives

(4)      p +   n +   d = 18

(7)            4n + 9d = 90

(9)                    3d = 18

Divide (9) by 3. This gives

(10) d = 6

Substitute (10) into (7). This gives

4n + 9(6) = 90

4n +   54 = 90

4n           = 36

(11) n       =    9

Substitute (10) and (11) into (4). This gives

p + 9 + 6 = 18

p +      15 = 18

p              =  3

Sasha has 3 pennies, 9 nickels, and 6 dimes.

Answer:

155 + 165.3 - 65.5 - 23.25 - 26.45

Step-by-step explanation:

She had $155 dollars in the starting = +155

She withdrew $65.5 = -65.5

She withdrew another $23.25 = -23.25

She withdrew another $26.45 = -26.45

The deposited $165.3 = +165.3

The expression looks like:

155 + 165.3 - 65.5 - 23.25 - 26.45

We could simplify the expression:

155 + 165.3 - 65.5 - 23.25 - 26.45

=> 320.3 - 88.75 - 26.45

=> 320.3 -115.2

=> 205.1

At the end of the week, she had a total of $205.10.

Answer:

a.H0 : u1= u2 against Ha : u1≠ u2 This is a two sided test

b) There isn't enough evidence that the machine is not meeting the manufacturer’s specifications in terms of the average breaking strength.

c) the p- value is 0.0359*2= 0.0718. It is greater than the value of ∝ so there isn't enough evidence that the machine is not meeting the manufacturer’s specifications in terms of the average breaking strength.

d) There is enough evidence that the machine is not meeting the manufacturer’s specifications in terms of the average breaking strength.

e) There isn't enough evidence that the machine is not meeting the manufacturer’s specifications in terms of the average breaking strength.

Step-by-step explanation:

Formulate the null and alternative hypotheses as

a) H0 : u1= u2 against Ha : u1≠ u2 This is a two sided test

Here ∝= 0.005

For alpha by 2 for a two tailed test Z∝/2 = ± 1.96

Standard deviation = s= 3.5 pounds

n= 49

The test statistic used here is

Z = x- x`/ s/√n

Z= 69.1- 70 / 3.5 / √49

Z= -1.80

Since the calculated value of Z= -1.80 falls in the critical region we reject the null hypothesis.

b) There isn't enough evidence that the machine is not meeting the manufacturer’s specifications in terms of the average breaking strength.

c) the p- value is 0.0359*2= 0.0718. It is greater than the value of ∝ so there isn't enough evidence that the machine is not meeting the manufacturer’s specifications in terms of the average breaking strength.

d) If standard deviation is 1.75 pounds

The test statistic used here is

Z = x- x`/ s/√n

Z= 69.1- 70 / 1.75 / √49

Z= -3.6

This value does not fall in the critical region.

d) There is enough evidence that the machine is not meeting the manufacturer’s specifications in terms of the average breaking strength.

e) If the sample mean is 69 pounds

Z = x- x`/ s/√n

Z= 69.1- 69 / 3.5 / √49

Z= 0.2

This value falls in the critical region

e) There isn't enough evidence that the machine is not meeting the manufacturer’s specifications in terms of the average breaking strength.

Answer:

610805 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

The volume of grain in the silo will be calculated as equal to the volume of the cylinder formed by the silo

Height of the silo [tex]l[/tex] = 30 ft

radius of the silo r = 12 ft

volume of a cylinder = [tex]\pi r^{2} l[/tex]

substituting, we have

V = 3.142 x [tex]12^{2}[/tex] x 30 = 13573.44 cubic feet

We know that density ρ = weight/volume

density of the grains in the silo = 45 pound/cubic feet

therefore,

weight of grains = density x volume

weight of grains = 45 x 13573.44 = 610804.8 ≅ 610805 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

2., 3., 4., 5.

yes, you had the right idea to calculate the half distances between the coordinates. just create the absolute values of the full distance before cutting it in half.

you need to remember : we have to go this half distance from one point to the other (meaning adding our subtracting the half distance to/from the starting point).

2.

(-4, 6) to (10, -10)

in x the distance is 10 - -4 = 14. half is 7.

in y the distance is |-10 - 6| = |-16| = 16. half is 8.

so the midpoint is

(-4 + 7, 6 - 8) = (3, -2)

remember, to go the half distance in the direction towards the second point (so we have to choose properly, when to use "+" and "-" depending on the change of the coordinate : from -4 to 10 we have to add, from 6 to -10 we have to subtract, of course).

3.

(-3, -8) to (-6.5, -4.5)

in x distance : -3 - -6.5 = 3.5. half is 1.75

in y distance : -8 - -4.5 = |-3.5| = 3.5. half is 1.75

midpoint is

(-3 - 1.75, -8 + 1.75) = (-4.75, -6.25)

4.

(3, 7) to (-8, -10)

x : 3 - -8 = 11. half is 5.5

y : 7 - -10 = 17. half is 8.5

midpoint is

(3 - 5.5, 7 - 8.5) = (-2.5, -1.5)

5.

(-6, -13) to (-6.4, -3.8)

x : -6 - -6.4 = 0.4. half is 0.2

y : -13 - -3.8 = |-9.2| = 9.2. half is 4.6

midpoint is

(-6 - 0.2, -13 + 4.6) = (-6.2, -8.4)

6.

(-1, 7) to (5, 1)

x : -1 - 5 = |-6| = 6. 1/3 is 2.

y : 7 - 1 = 6. 1/3 is 2.

1/3 from C to D

(-1 + 2, 7 - 2) = (1, 5)

7.

2/3 of the way from D to C is the same point as in 6. (1/3 from C to D).

again

(1, 5)

8.

2/3 of the way from C to D.

so, we need to double what we added in 6.

(-1 + 4, 7 - 4) = (3, 3)

9.

1/3 of the way from D to C is the same point as in 8. (2/3 of the way from C to D).

again

(3, 3)

10.

exactly. Pythagoras.

the square root of the sum of the squares of the coordinate differences.

distance = sqrt((x1 - x2)² + (y1 - y2)²)

11.

(6, 8) to (-1, 8)

distance = sqrt((6 - -1)² + (8 - 8)²) = sqrt(49) = 7

12.

(5, -6) to (5, 6)

sqrt((5-5)² + (-6-6)²) = sqrt(144) = 12

13.

(-2, 0) to (11, 0)

sqrt((-2 - 11)² + (0-0)²) = sqrt(169) = 13

14.

(1, -5) to (9, 1)

sqrt((1-9)² + (-5 - 1)²) = sqrt(64 + 36) = sqrt(100) = 10

15.

ST and MT are basically the same equation.

MT is half of ST.

ST equation based on 2 points :

y – yS={(yT – yS)/(xT – xS)}(x – xS)

M = (xS + (xT - xS)/2, yS +(yT - yS)/2)

so, let's put that into the general equation :

y - yM={(yT - yM)/(xT - xM)}(x - xM)

y - (yS +(yT - yS)/2) = {(yT - (yS +(yT - yS)/2))/(xT - (xS + (xT - xS)/2))}(x - (xS + (xT - xS)/2))

16.

the two corners farthest away are (5, 10) and (9, 6).

what distance from (0, 0) is now bigger ?

since it is (0, 0), we can skip the 0s and just sum up the squares of the coordinates.

5² + 10² = 125

9² + 6² = 117

so, the corner (5, 10) is the farthest away.

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

since 7 tonnes can be shredded per day you need o divide the amount you have by 7

so 7/4 /7 = 1/4

so it will  take 1/4 days

Answer:

[tex] \frac{1}{4} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Make a ratio

7 : 1

7/4:x

Cross multiple

7x = 7/4

Then make x a subject formula

x =1/4

Using the hypothesis test for one sample mean, There is NO SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE to support the typist's claim

[tex]H_{0} = 45\\H_{1} < 45\\\\[/tex]

The test statistic :

T = (x - μ) ÷ (s/√(n))

T = (43 - 45) ÷ (15/√70)

T = - 2 ÷ 1.7928429

T = -1.12

At α = 0.05

Pvalue :

Degree of freedom, df = 70 - 1 = 69

Pvalue = 0.1333

Decision region :

Reject [tex]H_{0}[/tex] if Pvalue < α

0.1333 > 0.05

Since Pvalue > α We fail to reject the Null

Learn more on hypothesis testing: https://brainly.com/question/20262540

Answer:

Below

Step-by-step explanation:

● 8 ÷ (3-x)

Dividing by 3-x is like multiplying by 1/(3-x)

● 8 × (1/3-x)

● 8 /(3-x)

Answer:

x = 1, y = -1

Step-by-step explanation:

If we have the two equations:

[tex]4x+3y=1[/tex] and [tex]-3x - 6y = 3[/tex], we can look at which variable will be easiest to eliminate.

[tex]y[/tex] looks like it might be easy to get rid of, we just have to multiply [tex]4x+3y=1[/tex]  by 2 and y is gone (as -6y + 6y = 0).

So let's multiply the equation [tex]4x+3y=1[/tex]  by 2.

[tex]2(4x + 3y = 1)\\8x + 6y = 2[/tex]

Now we can add these equations

[tex]8x + 6y = 2\\-3x-6y=3\\[/tex]

------------------------

[tex]5x = 5[/tex]

Dividing both sides by 5, we get [tex]x = 1[/tex].

Now we can substitute x into an equation to find y.

[tex]4(1) + 3y = 1\\4 + 3y = 1\\3y = -3\\y = -1[/tex]

Hope this helped!

Answer:

hope. It helps. What. I Understood

Answer:

A. Q1 = 4.6; Q2 = 5.5; Q3 = 5.95

Step-by-step explanation:

{4.3, 4.5, 4.7, 5, 5.5, 5.7, 5.9, 6, 6.1}

First find the median or the 2nd quartile

There are 9 data points so the middle is the 5th

4.3, 4.5, 4.7, 5,     5.5,     5.7, 5.9, 6, 6.1}

Q2 = 5.5

Now looking at the data on the left, we need to find the middle, which is Q1 or the first quartile

4.3, 4.5     , 4.7, 5,

It is between 4.5 and 4.7 so we average

(4.5+4.7)/2 = 9.2/2 = 4.6

Q1 is 4.6

We do the same for the data on the right, which is the third quartile or Q3

5.7, 5.9,  6, 6.1

(5.9+6)/2 = 11.9/2 = 5.95

Q3 = 5.95

Answer: IT'S A !!

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

70%

Step-by-step explanation:

The method to find out percentage increase is by subtracting the original price from the increased price and making it into a fractional form with the denominator as 10 (out of 100%). So it results to this.

(original price - increased price) / 10

(17 - 10) / 10 = 7/10

7/10 can be converted from its fractional form to 70% i.e.its percentage.

Hope this helps and please mark as the brainliest.

Answer:

40

Explanations

Have to multiple 20 by 2 then your answer would be 40

The mode of the increased data will be 22.

The mode is that specific value that is found several times in a certain observation of a set of values.

Here, mode of some data is 20.

Therefore, 20 is the most repeated value of that data observation.

Now, the each of value is increased by 2.

Then, the mode will be (20+2)=22

Learn more about mode here :

https://brainly.ph/question/12346912

#SPJ2

Answer:

150.

Step-by-step explanation

Answer:

2400$

Step-by-step explanation:

Miller's Family spends 50% of their budget on housing and we know that they spent 1200$ this month, so 1200$*2 = 2400$.

Have a nice day! :-)

Answer:

a. 7k - 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Write out expression

-k - (-8k + 7)

Step 2: Distribute negative

-k + 8k - 7

Step 3: Combine like terms

7k - 7

And we have our answer!

Answer:

0 is the answer measure 1

Answer:

It’s symmetric property

Answer:

Symmetry

Step-by-step explanation:

The guy above me

Answer:

one half

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the rotation from 12 to 6 is one-half of a complete rotation, it seems reasonable to assume that the hour hand is moving continuously and has therefore moved one-half of the distance between the 2 and the 3. source- ck12.org

Answer:

Volume = 1152 x pi km^3

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume = 1/3 x pi x r^2 x h

Volume = 1/3 x pi x 12^2 x 24

Volume = 1152 x pi

Answer:

For the null hypothesis to be rejected , then the conclusion of the test is that the absolute values of the z-statistic and/or the t-test statistic is greater than the critical value

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, we want to explain the conclusion of the test given that the null hypothesis is rejected.

Mathematically, the null hypothesis is as expressed as below;

H0: μ = 1,200

The alternative hypothesis H1 would be;

H1: μ > 1,200

Now, before we can reject or accept the null hypothesis, we will need a sample size and thus calculate the test statistics and the z statistics

For us to reject the null hypothesis, one of two things, or two things must have occurred.

The absolute value of the z statistic |z| or the test statistic |t| must be greater than the critical value.

If this happens, then we can make a rejection of the null hypothesis

x=2.86

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] {a}^{2} + {b}^{2} = {c}^{2} [/tex]

[tex] {24}^{2} + {32}^{2} = 40[/tex]

[tex]c = 40[/tex]

[tex]6x + 6 + 9x - 9 = 40[/tex]

[tex](6x + 9x) + (6 - 9) = 40[/tex]

[tex]15x - 3 = 40[/tex]

[tex]15x = 43[/tex]

[tex]x = 2.866[/tex]

[tex]23.16 + 16.74 = 39.9[/tex]

the

[tex]6(2.86) + 6 = 23.16[/tex]

[tex]9(2.86) - 9 = 16.74[/tex]